issue36 [color=#0048ff]同主题修改版，改过的同学过来瞄一眼，没改过的更加欢迎

龙非UID: 193190

The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
****************************************************************************************
Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly.

In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital after his name to remember him forever. Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, respected by the whole world now, is decided to be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.

Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.

Even in science, in which realm, the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.

Admittedly, in many situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities. For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

晚上再给你看 忙死了 自己的任务还没完成 sigh 抱歉了

migao21UID: 58234

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly.
从B1中可以看出这个也是写的反对：就是当代和以后的人都可以定义伟人


In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital with his name to remember him forever. Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, respected by the whole world now, is decided to be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.
论证可以被当代承认的伟人， 感觉有些语句很拗口。


Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.
继续从艺术的角度来论证当代也可以决定伟人


Even in science, in which realm, the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.
科学角度


Admittedly, in many situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities. For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.

总的来说，我觉得这篇写的很不错， 论证的方法比较新颖：从3个不同的方面，抓住assertion中的一个明显漏洞展开论证自己的观点(by their contemporaries)，避开后人决定伟人的观点，只有在最后稍微妥协，却不影响本文的论证。 举的例子也很丰富。 结尾段再加工一下就好了  

山坡羊UID: 169978

我来学习一下

山坡羊UID: 169978

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly.
[龙非的破题一直很巧妙，挑好说的写，佩服! 但thus前后觉得缺乏因果关系，不顺]
In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital with his name to remember him forever. [怎么我对语法看不明白呢]Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, respected by the whole world now, is decided to [？]be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.[ to do so]

Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While[while通常用它相对的意思一面，这里我不知道可以否] the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For[from] these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.

Even in science, in which realm, [逗号不要舒服些吧]the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live[living,有在世的意思。只是，这句话别拗，20世纪最伟大的当然生活在20世纪啦] in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.

Admittedly, in many[some会不会好些] situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities.[为什么局限于客观的认识就不能决定伟大呢？是否可以再分析一下？] For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.[后半句可以不要吧]

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.
[学习中！觉得这种破题和方法挺好的，只说一面就驳倒，在分领域说上三段，不必想破脑袋，很是轻松，打算也采用逆这种结构了：]
[但有一点，我觉得你没有说清楚为何后代更有效在in many circumstances, 说理和例子上都没有，不如不加限定词算了，你觉得呢？]

龙非UID: 193190

吱吱不要急，慢慢来
谢谢migao21的意见。

龙非UID: 193190

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly.
[龙非的破题一直很巧妙，挑好说的写，佩服! 但thus前后觉得缺乏因果关系，不顺] 嗯，羊说得好，其实是有因果关系，这是没点透，在thus之前再点一下
In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital with his name to remember him forever. [怎么我对语法看不明白呢] ？？不是the achievement was knowledged的反问句吗？？Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, respected by the whole world now, is decided to [？] 换个词好了，consider asbe one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.[ to do so] can do it

Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While[while通常用它相对的意思一面，这里我不知道可以否] 这个地方没用好，本来是两个例子，while取当。。。的时候，但是后面加了个例子，这个地方就用错了the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For[from] these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.

Even in science, in which realm, [逗号不要舒服些吧]the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live[living,有在世的意思。只是，这句话别拗，20世纪最伟大的当然生活在20世纪啦] 呵呵，确实，要改一改，想表达的时候还是他们被同时代的人所承认in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.

Admittedly, in many[some会不会好些] 确实，用了some能加强说服力，不会显得让得太厉害situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities.[为什么局限于客观的认识就不能决定伟大呢？是否可以再分析一下？] 不是说他们局限于客观认识，而是说他们在客观认识方面有限制，也就是说他们不能很好地做到客观，如果要分析不能客观就不能决定伟大，就远了，这是整篇的基础。应该是表达还不够清楚For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.[后半句可以不要吧] 我对让步的看法是让步的同时一样要为主题服务，也就是说虽然我让步了，但是同时还是点一点主题，显得更有说服力，你觉得呢？

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.
[学习中！觉得这种破题和方法挺好的，只说一面就驳倒，在分领域说上三段，不必想破脑袋，很是轻松，打算也采用逆这种结构了：]
这是修改版，原版想破了脑袋都没能理清思路，所以就轻巧一点
[但有一点，我觉得你没有说清楚为何后代更有效在in many circumstances, 说理和例子上都没有，不如不加限定词算了，你觉得呢？] 我是认为自己说不清楚，语言能力不行:D，与其这样不如避开这个问题，把他作为一个默契，当然，能点一点会更好

山坡羊UID: 169978

出去吃饭时又想到，这样的分领域论证基本还是事例论证，缺乏道理论证，就算不说in many circumstance,（为什么当代能决定?) 这样会不会不够好？——讨论一下吧！

哦，我看过你185，有个问题也想讨论，也是分领域，你看到了吗？

龙非UID: 193190

185？？我去看看，西西，沉得太底了。

龙非UID: 193190

个人感觉分领域并不是万能药，我也是没有太好的想法，也就是觉得说理力度不够的话才会选分领域，这种做法有点四两拨千斤的感觉，特别是对于向36这种题目，你说“只有后代可以”，那我只要立论说不是，分领域每个举个例子说有当代可以，只要够严谨，不会影响分数，虽然如果能够深入进去将为什么会使文章更有深度，但是好像性价比不高，自圆其说是最主要的，因为我始终觉得我们的英语水平不允许我们在45分钟之内搞定，大牛可以考虑。

thinking in GTUID: 195028

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly. 反对观点，

In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George为啥倒过来啊，又不是正式文书, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital after his name to remember him forever. Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, respected by the whole world now, is decided to be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.

Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.

Even in science, in which realm, the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.

Admittedly, in many situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities. For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision. 呵呵，结尾读着像阿狗

楼主的观点很奇特，引例也很准确，估计考官也会眼前一亮，当初我觉得这个立场较难，如果不能准确把握例证，很有可能跑题，对自己掌握的素材没有信心，向楼主学习

猫猫624UID: 171232

新手,发表一下意见.有不足之处见晾.
作者文章总体是不错的.条理清楚,例子丰富,值得佩服学习.
但是看过之后发现作者正文前三段只是从三方面论证great people 可以由当代人评价,例子很多,但是有例子堆砌的感觉,也缺乏分析.
此外对题目分析也不太深入,只是列举现象事实,没有究其背后原因.语言有些罗嗦.
以下是我的中文提纲,
1 伟人可以由当代人评价.从科学艺术等角度举例说明.
2 由于great people 的思想有时过于具有前瞻,有些时候不能为同时代人接受.
3 随着人类社会的发展,后人更容易对伟人的贡献得出公正的评价.
晚上回去写,发上来.望与楼主相互交流!

viviansiUID: 190413

待会 来学习一下

davidjackyUID: 135962

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and domake the decision correctly.开头可以了，

In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital after his name to remember him forever. Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, respected by the whole world now, is decided to be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.
用政客的例子来说明你的观点，可以。小问题：can用的too多，应该可以换词；named sth after sb.就可以，sb就是sb’s name，你见过例外吗？；washington同学应该是acknowledged by his compermporaries等等细节问题要斟酌
Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then; While the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.

Even in science, in which realm, the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.
这段从科学角度分析当代人和后代人同样可以评论伟人和伟人事迹，也还行。同样有些小错误：deserve的用法是不对的
Admittedly, in many situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities. For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.
文中用了gogh同学和bruto同学为例，说明的问题无非是当代人的局限而未能对伟人进行评判，但是你结论是说不是所有的情况下当代人不能作这样的决定，这样的结论似乎不太合适你本段的论述，作为结尾句的写法，好好再考虑一下，
In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.
结尾略显苍白，那么长的引用实在不是你龙非的风格吧，老外280的结尾你可以借鉴一下，很简单，希望你下次更加努力，继续关注寄托的同主题写作风暴

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

Our mankind’s history is filled with numerous giants in all kinds of areas. Yet is posterity or contemporaries who on earth can decide the greatness of individuals? It is the people who can give an objective evaluation to the to-be great men. Thus, the posterities may be the most proper candidates who can evaluate the contributions of the great objectively by the rear-view mirror of history, but I believe that in some circumstances, the contemporaries can also clearly recognize the greatness of individuals and do the decision correctly.开头8错，赞。那一堆great也不见了，哈哈

In the first place, the contemporaries can correctly decide the greatness of politicians sometimes. Commonly, the contributions of politicians are obvious and can be recognized immediately by those who live in the same time. Hence, the contemporaries can do the decision. For supporting examples we need look no further than Washington George, the U.S. first president. Wasn’t the achievement of the great president acknowledged his contemporaries who even named their capital after his name to remember him forever. 这句怎么wasn’t 然后找问号没找到Also consider that South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, respected by the whole world now, is decided to be one of the greatest men of our time by us, his contemporaries. Thus, it can be see that in politics, sometimes the contemporaries can decide the accomplishment of politicians correctly and the posterities are not the only men.这段写的比上次读起来顺多了，上次那个第二句就是有些像例子又有些不像例子，塞进去连贯

Moreover, in art, under many circumstances, the contemporaries can also objectively decide the greatness of artists for the simple reason that art can be evaluated at face value. Whether in music, visual art or literature, there is nothing to be proved or be disproved and people can judge the artists' contributions relatively easily. The history is replete with such examples that artistic greatness is recognized immediately. Through his symphony, European in nineteenth century recognized Beethoven's musical accomplishment then;我和小鬼鬼一致认为这种句子读起来不顺劲，先代词，后冒出来主语。再讨论 While the greatness of Picasso was acknowledged in his prime of life, and Shakespeare already became household name even during his lifetime. For these convincing examples, we can draw a conclusion that sometimes, the contemporaries are also able to decide the greatness of the artists and there is no necessity of leaving all the decision to those live after them.实在没虾米可说了，还是写的不错，清晰明了

Even in science, in which realm, the theories should be proved or be disproved and the contemporaries may usually hardly to evaluate the scientist correctly. 这是个单句吧，上面in which realm貌似要定从了，但是没找到，而且为虾米要even呢？Sometimes, the contemporaneous are still able to decide the greatness of scientists. For instance, Thomas Edison who patented more than one thousand inventions was called one of the greatest inventors by his contemporaries and he really was deserved. And the three giants that the people of twentieth century regarded as three of the greatest scientists, Einstein for his theory of relativity, Heisenberg for his quantum mechanics, Watson for his spiral model, the double helix, for the molecular structure of DNA, are all live in the twentieth century. These examples tell us clearly that not only从你的例子好像没看出not only的意思，没有两边都顾的意思，我感觉你是为了回应题目的才提到这点 the posterities but also the contemporaries can decide the achievement of the great scientists sometimes.

Admittedly, in many让步就别many了，说少数情况 situations, the contemporaries are limited in objective recognition of the achievement of the giants so that they can not decide the greatness of individuals correctly and have to leave the decision to the posterities. For examples, accomplishment of Van Gogh, one of the greatest painters, was recognized after he died. And Bruno was regards as a great scientist three hundred years after he was burned at the stake. Despite in many circumstances, only the posterities can decide the greatness of individuals, it is not all the time the contemporaneous can not do it, and sometimes they can as we have seen.嗯，不错，和上次写法不一样了，这段也不错，加强了你的观点，不过despite那句转的稍稍突了点，和你的例子连不上，为啥凡高没卖出去画布鲁诺被烧死了就是only the posterities can decide 觉得还是说你的当代人受到一些局限，比如当代流行的思潮了，审美了云云，影响到判断，但是这样如何如何。关键是在这段我又发现了好多great greatness哈哈啊哈

In conclusion, although the posterities are the appropriate candidates to evaluate the great men in many circumstances, the saying “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries” as the speaker claims晕，开头不restate 赞，谁料放结尾去了，原封不动引用，不大好吧 is unreasonable and sometimes the contemporaries can also do the decision.

没虾米好说的，写的不错，比上次更清晰啦，也把那些great都消灭啦！
问题都是小问题，不影响观瞻，都在文中说啦。对了鼓励一下下，小鬼鬼说：很喜欢你的作文呢! 我也很羡慕你对题目的理解和分析，总能找到省劲的方向然后写的很完整透彻。