issue172 内有详细的思路变化，谢谢大家的讨论，同样也请大家指点

妖妖UID: 149770

关于ISSUE 思路的变化，请大家指点，那种思路更好。

以ISSUE 172 “Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.” 为例。

是开始限制时间的做的。

刚刚看到这个题目，，心理一喜，遂conditional 一下。从生物学的进化论，物理的相对论，天文的日心说开始。一段一段的TS开头，然后就一个一个CASE跟上去。觉得这样好写，并且字数容易上去。

现在觉得字数实在成问题，大约我真的写作问题大，写观点的时候，总是不能上字数，一写就是脑袋有中文，手上没有英语。觉得一写例子字就容易上去了。

但是转念一想，这样的写法好象是非常的平稳的，高分是没有了，但是3-3.5可能有。我对ISSUE 就这样的要求。：（

写掉后，继续考虑这个问题，突然觉得，既然ETS，要的是CRITICAL THINKING， 是不是可以这样来想，
1.        什么是Important truths，， 给一个定义，然后说一下状态，比如把生物，天文，物理中的经典的Important truths 用比较简单的几个话凑成一段。

2.        为什么会和accepted wisdom of the time 会有冲突，或者at least uncomfortable。几个小的分论点：1）. 伴随的科技的发展，人们认识NATURE是循序渐进的，从表面慢慢的到本质，而本质和表面常常是有巨大的差别的。2）.每个人都有他的时代局限性，所以，对这样面对巨大的差别，所以有人uncomfortable，，甚至 aggressive。

3.         admittedly 一下，举一些CASE，比如：一些思想是在原来基础上的深入。比如：现代生物学的分子技术提出的基因学的观点就是在原来植物学人工授粉的理论上深入的，所以比较accepted, 但是这也是一个非常重要的TRUTHS。 At least it is the basic of recent genetic.

4.        总结是partly agree the topic.

不知道后面一个是不是会跟好点，但是有一点可以肯定的是，后面一种，我用了一阵脑袋，感觉推理了一下，有点跟做了一题数学题目，前面那种，基本没有动脑子，大约跟打字一样打一堆东西上去了。

如果是后面一种可行的话，那估计挺多题目的ANALYSIS 都可以这样 思维模板一下。


Issue172  第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：33分20秒     558 words
从2005年2月14日16时33分到2005年2月14日17时33分
------题目------
Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.
------正文------
When we talk about the important truths, we cannot stop thinking of some famous scientists and philosophers and their famous stories including the dramatic response of the people at the times. It cannot deny that many important truths began as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the minds of the time from the aspect of the whole human history.

Which kind o
f minds or theory can be attributed to the important truths which seems how absurdity at their first birth? As far as I concerned, I regarded those including the evolutionism in biology, the relative theory in physical, the centural of sun（日心说） in astronomy, the law of segregation in genetic and something like these which cover the inner of the nature and predicate the development of science in the future. The history will stop without these perishable presents brought by the famous scholars, though many of them even gave up their live for their truths.

Then you may be wonder, why such useful things, in other words the most important things of human beings, cannot be accepted by the people of the time? Why the correlation between the new and the old should be so outrageous?

First of all, because it is a process for us to recognize something from the surface to the inner, and in most condition the surface is greatly different from the inner. Take evolutionism theory as an example. With the help of the advanced navigation, Darwin had the opportunity to collect many fossils around the world and made the detailed oberservation of various creatures in many kinds of surrounding. So he discovered a shocking theory that we all originated from the lower creatures which looks greatly different from us. Without the data gathered by the biologist, it is hard to convince us that we had the relationship with the animals or the trees around us.

Second because all of us had the mind limitation brought by the culture and science weakness. No one can look the world with the pristine eyes as the new-born baby. All of us saw the world edited by the education and the culture of their own. So it is impossible to let an religious Christina to give up their old view to accept the new one-- God did not create the race, we were originated from the lower creatures at the end of the 18th century. So did many other theories:  the greater difference between new and the old, the more outrageous they are.

Admittedly, there are still some important theories that were easily accepted by the people at the time for the theory was similar to the original one. That is say, as mentioned above the ones whose surface is similar to the inner. The most typical case should be the law of segregation which is the basic theory of modern genetic and molecular biology. Almost all of the scientist took this theory for granted for it is similar the cross breeding theory which was widely used in agriculture for  hundreds of years. But not all the theories were luck as it, when we turned back to the whole human history.

In sum, many truths attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time for the new is greatly different from the old. But it should not represent all the theory for in most situation the surface and the inner are greatly different.

DriverEntryUID: 143979

Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.
------正文------

When we talk about the important truths, we cannot 是想说忍不住吧。应该是CANNOT HELP TO DO 还是DOING的，记不清了stop thinking of some famous scientists and philosophers and their famous stories including the dramatic response of the people at the times. It cannot deny that many important truths began as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the minds of the time from the aspect of the whole human history.

Which kind of minds or theory can be attributed to the important truths which seems how absurdity at their first birth? As far as I concerned, I regarded those including the evolutionism in biology, the relative theory in physical, the centural of sun（日心说） 日心说有个专门的词了，不过我也忘了。in astronomy, the law of segregation in genetic基因分离这个在你倒数第2段里不是变成非激进的理论了么？自相矛盾了。 and something like these which cover the inner of the nature and predicate the development of science in the future. The 加个SCIENTIFIC比较好。即使科技不发展，人类社会还是在变化的 history will stop without these perishable presents brought by the famous scholars, though many of them even gave upSACRIFICED their live for their truths.

Then you may beBE去掉，WONDER是动词 wonder, why such useful things, in other words the most important things of human beings, cannot be accepted by the people of the time? Why the correlation相关性？和后面的OUTRAGEOUS不搭配 between the new and the old should be so outrageous?

First of all, because it is a process for us to recognize something from the surface to the inner, and in most conditionS the surface is greatly different from the inner. Take evolutionism theory as an example. With the help of the advanced navigation, Darwin had the opportunity to collect many fossils around the world and made the detailed oberservation of various creatures in many kinds of surrounding. So he discovered a shocking theory that we all originated from the lower creatures which looks greatly different from us. Without the data gathered by the biologist, it is hard to convince us that we had the relationship with the animals or the trees around us.

SecondBECAUSE一般接从句，这么直接用我觉得不好 because all of us had the mind limitation brought by the culture and science weakness. No one can look the world with the pristine eyes as the new-born baby. All of us saw the world edited by the education and the culture of theirOUR own. So it is impossible to let anA religious Christina to give up their old view to accept the new one-- God did not create the race, we were originated from the lower creatures at the end of the 18th century. So did many other theories: the greater difference between new and the old, the more outrageous IMPACTSthey areBROUGHT TO PEOPLE.

Admittedly, there are still some important theories that were easily accepted by the people at the time for the theory was similar to the original one. That is sayIS SAY？BE 动词和动词原形放一块？中间少个TO。, as mentioned above the ones whose surface is similar to the inner. The most typical case should be the law of segregation which is the basic theory of modern genetic and molecular biology. Almost all of the scientist took this theory for granted for it is similar WITHthe cross breeding theory which was widely used in agriculture for hundreds of years. But not all the theories were luckLUCKY，LUCK是名词 as it, when we turned back to the whole human history.

In sum, many truths attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 加个逗号，FOR当表原因时是引导从句，加个逗号，你几个地方都没加for the new is greatly different from the old. But it should not represent all the theory逗号 for in most situation the surface and the inner are greatly different. 最后这句话比较怪。翻译过来是：他没有代表所有的理论，因为大多数理论的内在和表面有很大不同。感觉你想说的是相反的方面把？

总的来说写法还可以，有些自己的分析，当然是这种写法比单纯的罗列例子好了。老鬼不是写两个一个关于例子的文章么，可以看看。
但是文章里还有一些小的语法错误，尽量避免吧，为了这些扣分太亏了。

鬼谷子UID: 159645

占

鬼谷子UID: 159645

关于ISSUE 思路的变化，请大家指点，那种思路更好。

以ISSUE 172 “Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.” 为例。

是开始限制时间的做的。

刚刚看到这个题目，，心理一喜，遂conditional 一下。从生物学的进化论，物理的相对论，天文的日心说开始。一段一段的TS开头，然后就一个一个CASE跟上去。觉得这样好写，并且字数容易上去。

现在觉得字数实在成问题，大约我真的写作问题大，写观点的时候，总是不能上字数，一写就是脑袋有中文，手上没有英语。觉得一写例子字就容易上去了。

但是转念一想，这样的写法好象是非常的平稳的，高分是没有了，但是3-3.5可能有。我对ISSUE 就这样的要求。：（

写掉后，继续考虑这个问题，突然觉得，既然ETS，要的是CRITICAL THINKING， 是不是可以这样来想，
1. 什么是Important truths，， 给一个定义，然后说一下状态，比如把生物，天文，物理中的经典的Important truths 用比较简单的几个话凑成一段。

2. 为什么会和accepted wisdom of the time 会有冲突，或者at least uncomfortable。几个小的分论点：1）. 伴随的科技的发展，人们认识NATURE是循序渐进的，从表面慢慢的到本质，而本质和表面常常是有巨大的差别的。2）.每个人都有他的时代局限性，所以，对这样面对巨大的差别，所以有人uncomfortable，，甚至 aggressive。

3. admittedly 一下，举一些CASE，比如：一些思想是在原来基础上的深入。比如：现代生物学的分子技术提出的基因学的观点就是在原来植物学人工授粉的理论上深入的，所以比较accepted, 但是这也是一个非常重要的TRUTHS。 At least it is the basic of recent genetic.

4. 总结是partly agree the topic.

不知道后面一个是不是会跟好点，但是有一点可以肯定的是，后面一种，我用了一阵脑袋，感觉推理了一下，有点跟做了一题数学题目，前面那种，基本没有动脑子，大约跟打字一样打一堆东西上去了。

如果是后面一种可行的话，那估计挺多题目的ANALYSIS 都可以这样 思维模板一下。【想法和分析都不错，小妖有进步】


Issue172 第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户 共用时间：33分20秒 558 words
从2005年2月14日16时33分到2005年2月14日17时33分
------题目------
Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.
------正文------
When we talk about the important truths, we cannot stop【同司机意见，用cannot help doing舒服一点】 thinking of some famous scientists and philosophers and their famous stories including the dramatic response of the people at the times. 【对于什么的response呢？不清楚】 It cannot deny 【 it is undeniable that】that many important truths began as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the minds of the time from the aspect of the whole human history. 【背景和观点衔接的不好】

Which kind o
f minds or theory can be attributed to the important truths which seems how【去掉】 absurdity at their first birth? As far as I concerned, I regarded those including the evolutionism in biology, the relative theory【theory of relativity】 in physical, the centural of sun（日心说） 【heliocentric theory】in astronomy, the law of segregation in genetic and something like these which cover the inner of the nature and predicate 【这里说帮助促进是不是会好一点呢】the development of science in the future. The history will stop without【这个论断就太大了，你可以说发展会受到影响，不过不至于不发展啊】 these perishable【容易腐烂的:eek: 你想说cherishable吧？】 presents brought by the famous scholars, though many of them even gave up their live for their truths.

Then you may be wonder, 【be去掉】why such useful things, in other words the most important things of human beings, cannot be accepted by the people of the time? Why the correlation between the new and the old should be so outrageous? 【用you may wonder并不好，这样用就是假设读者已经同意这样的观点，然后后面才解释为什么。不过，读者不一定是这样认为的，而你需要去说服读者，所以，这里应该说你是怎么样认为的比较好一点】

First of all, because it is a process for us to recognize something from the surface to the inner, and in most condition the surface is greatly different from the inner. Take evolutionism theory as an example. With the help of the advanced navigation, Darwin had the opportunity to collect many fossils around the world and made the detailed oberservation 【observation】of various creatures in many kinds of surrounding【复数】. So he discovered a shocking theory that we all originated from the lower creatures which looks greatly different from us. Without the data gathered by the biologist, it is hard to convince us that we had the relationship with the animals or the trees around us. 【现象和本质如何联系，进化论怎样从现象到本质，进化论怎样不被接受，都没有交代】

Second【secondly，】 because all of us had the mind limitation brought by the culture and science weakness. No one can look the world with the pristine eyes as the new-born baby. All of us saw the world edited by the education and the culture of their own. So it is impossible to let an 【a】religious Christina【克里斯蒂那？Christian】 to give up their【his/her】 old view to accept the new one-- God did not create the race, we were originated from the lower creatures at the end of the 18th century. So did many other theories: the greater difference between new and the old, the more outrageous they are. 【按你的论据来看，应该说与limitation，pristine eyes不是很有联系，而是由于与人们的观点相抵触而产生的反感】

Admittedly, there are still some important theories that were easily accepted by the people at the time for the theory was similar to the original one. That is【to】 say, as mentioned above the ones whose surface is similar to the inner. 【怎么可能呢？现象和本质一样？这里论述的不好】The most typical case should be the law of segregation which is the basic theory of modern genetic and molecular biology. Almost all of the scientist【复数】 took this theory for granted for it is similar the cross breeding theory which was widely used in agriculture for hundreds of years. But not all the theories were luck as it, when we turned back to the whole human history.

In sum, many truths attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time for the new is greatly different from the old. But it should not represent all the theory for in most situation the surface and the inner are greatly different.
【基本上把你中文的思路表达出来了，整体的感觉还可以，不过低级错误，和论证的很多细节上面还要加强的。加油！】