Issue 87 大家来拍砖啊

tristan2004UID: 173439

Issue 87
  "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."


Nowadays, with the rapid social and technological development, there is a growing concern over how to treat the beginners and experts. Some people think that beginner, who is much younger and therefore has more courage, has a greater chance than the expert to make important discoveries. But in my opinion, the advantages of experts can not be ignored and they are more likely to success.

In the first place, the most important reason I convince experts is that experts have more basic knowledge and experiences than beginners, which is necessary for research. It is inevitable that people can meet a great number of problems while doing a research. Thus knowledge which is learned through many years' working is necessary to solve them. It is also true that experts can master lots of technologies better than beginners. For example, it is well known that a student who comes into the laboratory for the first time need to be taught to use the complicated equipments there for no one can expect them to have any idea of that. As a result, how can you expect the person who can not master the technology which is necessary in the process of researching to make any important discoveries?

In addition, experts already have made some discoveries and they are famous in their own field. Therefore, people are more convinced of their plan and are more likely to assign them much money, which is important for the research. When they have already made some discoveries, people also pay more attention to them, while that of some scientists who few people know may be ignored for many years although they are found to be of great importance later. It is like the competition of dancing, a young girl who firstly take part in this competition may fail although her dances well than the famous dancer because the latter can give people a good impression since everyone know that her technology is perfect which can influence her final grades greatly.

However, on the other hand, beginners also have their own advantages. As I described in the first paragraph, the knowledge experts master can also be an obstacle to them for it makes them to think too much things and thus lose courage, which the beginners have. For example, when Einstein published his paper announcing that light has both the characteristic of particle and fluctuation, a young man named de Broglie, who is a student of history, stated an assumption that electrons and other kind of concreted things may also have this characteristic, which the experts of physics can not even imagine. This assumption is proved right in several years and de Broglie gained his Nobel Price. This example perfectly illustrate that beginners sometimes have better imagination and courage than experts and that can help them succeed. However, this advantage of beginners can not carry more weight than its defects when both of them are carefully compared.

To sum up, although beginners have the courage to imagine something that the experts think is definitely impossible, they still lack basic knowledge and experience to gain success. We should pay more attention to them and give them more chances, but we can not conclude that it is less likely for experts to make important discovery.

boyjimUID: 125249

占个位置先~第一眼开头就不好了~明显的用ETS地范文哦！哈哈~

flyingwindUID: 189320

When they have already made some discoveries, people also pay more attention to them, while that of some scientists who few people know may be ignored for many years although they are found to be of great importance later.
这个和题目没有关系！没发现他的伟大，不待表他没作出大发现，贡献，，评价对错的问题，和社会发现早晚的问题不在这个题目范围里面，呵呵

你的第2个支持点是说的，人们愿意投资，这个还有点意思。我谨慎态度！重要的发现是不失vmoney可以买到的？

boyjimUID: 125249

Nowadays, with the rapid social and technological development, [范文你也敢...] there is a growing concern over how to treat the beginners and experts. Some people think that beginner, who is much younger and therefore has more courage, has a greater chance than the expert to make important discoveries. But in my opinion, the advantages of experts can not be ignored and they are more likely to success.

In the first place, the most important reason I convince [convince experts?] experts is that experts [用代词~] have more basic knowledge and experiences than beginners, which is necessary for research. It is inevitable that people can meet a great number of problems while doing a research. Thus knowledge which is learned through many years' working is necessary to solve them. [有必要解决问题？不明白] It is also true that experts can master lots of technologies better than beginners. For example, it is well known that a student who comes into the laboratory for the first time need to be taught to use the complicated equipments there for no one can expect them to have any idea of that. [懂得操作仪器就等于能有好的观点么？] As a result, how can you expect the person who can not master the technology which is necessary in the process of researching to make any important discoveries? [会操作技术也不一定成功，新手一旦学会操作技术，他们也还是新手 他们也可成功阿~~这里论证有毛病]

In addition, experts already have made some discoveries and they are famous in their own field. Therefore, people are more convinced of their plan and are more likely to assign them much money, which is important for the research. When they have already made some discoveries, people also pay more attention to them, while that of some [表达有问题] scientists who few [who few连用容易引起误会，用被动！] people know may be ignored for many years although they are found to be of great importance later. [句子有点乱，不如写成两句] It is like [这样类比开头不好] the competition of dancing, [面试audition好像是这个词吧] a young girl who firstly take part in this competition may fail although her dances well than the famous dancer because the latter can give people a good impression since everyone know that her technology is perfect which can influence her final grades greatly. [这个有点不当类比的味道哦]

However, on the other hand, beginners also have their own advantages [前面说expert的时候就用advantage这里用merit吧] . As I described in the first paragraph, [这句能省就省] the knowledge experts master can also be an obstacle to them for it makes them to think too much things and thus lose courage, which the beginners have. For example, when Einstein published his paper announcing that light has both the characteristic of particle and fluctuation, a young man named de Broglie, who is a student of history, stated an assumption that electrons and other kind of concreted things may also have this characteristic, which the experts of physics can not even imagine. This assumption is proved right in several years and de Broglie gained his Nobel Price. This example perfectly illustrate that beginners [broglie是beginner么？她不过是比老爱年轻一点而已~年轻专家不等于beginner!] sometimes have better imagination and courage than experts and that can help them succeed. However, this advantage of beginners can not carry more weight than its defects when both of them are carefully compared.

To sum up, although beginners have the courage to imagine something that the experts think is definitely impossible, they still lack basic knowledge and experience to gain success. We should pay more attention [结尾段要修饰阿！这个短语太...了] to them and give them more chances, but we can not conclude that it is less likely for experts to make important discovery.

tristan2004UID: 173439

谢谢楼上的兄弟阿，问题真是不少，需要大改，改完之后再发一篇
de Broglie那个例子，也许是我没有说清楚，他开始是学历史的，后来才转到物理，应该还不能严格算是专家吧，不过个人觉得还是有问题，关键问题在于专家的定义，如果一个转行没几年的人有了重大发现，那么是否就可以认为他在这之前就已经是专家了呢？