argument210机器人，机警题目哈

flyingwindUID: 189320

Argument210
------题目------
The following is a letter to the editor of a news magazine.
'Clearly, the successful use of robots on missions to explore outer space in the past 20 years demonstrates that robots could be increasingly used to perform factory work more effectively, efficiently, and profitably than human factory workers. The use of robots in factories would offer several advantages. First, robots never get sick, so absenteeism would be reduced. Second, robots do not make mistakes, so factories would increase their output. Finally, the use of robots would also improve the morale of factory workers, since factory work can be so boring that many workers would be glad to shift to more interesting kinds of tasks.'
------正文------
Inspired by the successful use of robots for exploring outer space in the past years, the editor of a new magazine recommend that robots could be successfully used to perform factory work by citing several merits the replacement from workers to robots. However, the editor should consider the difference between in outer space and in factory. And he/she should reexamine those merits from several other angles.

To begin with, whether those robots are easily available is the first thing any executives of factories should consider. It is mentioned that the successful robots are those exploring outer space, which is of course paid myriads of resource including money, human power, etc to design, maintain, considering the mission are especially sophisticatedly. Thus, it is understandable that those robots are successful. As to factory, different factory have distinctive demand to the design of robots, therefore improve the price of them, which might not be affordable by the factories. Besides, query possibility whether there are companies or institutions are willing to help design.

In addition, at first glance the robots never get sick, so the absenteeism would be reduced. Nevertheless, the general working of robots are limited by several aspects. They should be fueled by battery or electricity. So when the battery or electricity are in short supply, they don't work at all. Furthermore, they will also make 'mistakes' as workers. For example, due to mechanic flaws, robots may cease to function or function not conforming the design. Those 'mistakes' can be detrimental to the factory. Moreover, robots are not flexible as human beings. They perform routine actions as computer program has designed. When facing urgent problems they cannot response immediately as a worker. In short, robots, as machines in nature, may yield more 'absenteeism' than a common worker.

The last but not least, the author unfairly assume that those robots would receive applaud by workers so as to improve the moral of factory workers. First, the supersession of men/women by robots even makes workers feel far more boring than before. While in the old days workers can say some words during working time or have a chat after work, now many workers have to face the manlike machines all day long. Furthermore, the replacement of human beings with robots might decrease the moral of factory workers. Many workers might lose their jobs because their former works are done by robots, while the rest of those luck workers might in a nervous situation for unexpected opportunities of unemployment. That will decrease their morale at best.

In conclusion, before addressing the conclusion to the mass of the public, the editor of the magazine should consider further questions. In fact, the successful experience of robots in outer space cannot apply to the industry unselectedly; the robots might also 'sick' as common workers, and even worse; the mechanization of factory might decrease the morale of workers and in turn decrease the output.

staralwaysUID: 193479

Inspired by the successful use of robots for exploring outer space in the past years[开头加进这样的陈述感觉就是不一样了呢。我一直在为模板化的开头烦恼。], the editor of a new magazine recommend that robots could be successfully used to perform factory work by citing several merits [of]the replacement from workers to robots. However, the editor should consider the difference between in outer space and in factory. And he/she should reexamine those merits from several other angles.[读到这里感觉基本上没有用模板。不过我还是比较favor那个suffers from的开头（虽然也模板）。]

To begin with, whether those robots are easily available is the first thing any executives of factories should consider. It is mentioned that the successful robots are those exploring outer space, which is of course paid myriads of resource including money, human power, etc to design, maintain, considering the mission are especially sophisticatedly. Thus, it is understandable that those robots are successful. As to factory, different factory have distinctive demand to the design of robots, therefore improve the price of them, which might not be affordable by the factories. Besides, query possibility whether there are companies or institutions are willing to help design.[结尾的这句话不通，好象有语法错误。另外，感觉这段反驳的有问题。我觉得工厂流水线机器人是不是比空间机器人更便宜，更容易研制以及获得呢？比如说，美国“勇气”和“机遇”两个火星探测器耗费的是数以亿计的美圆；而当工厂流水线机器人的设计定下来后，规模化的生产并会有效的降低成本。反而是外太空探索所用的机器人由于各自目的的不同而需要单独研制。感觉你有点驳反了呢。]

In addition, at first glance the robots never get sick, so the absenteeism would be reduced. Nevertheless, the general working of robots are limited by several aspects. They should be fueled by battery or electricity. So when the battery or electricity are in short supply, they don't work at all. Furthermore, they will also make 'mistakes' as workers. For example, due to mechanic flaws, robots may cease to function or function not conforming the design[可以用malfunction这个词。]. Those 'mistakes' can be detrimental to the factory. Moreover, robots are not flexible as human beings. They perform routine actions as computer program has designed. When facing urgent problems they cannot response immediately as a worker. In short, robots, as machines in nature, may yield more 'absenteeism' than a common worker.[这个不错。而且有点讽刺的味道。]

The last but not least, the author unfairly assume that those robots would receive applaud by workers so as to improve the moral of factory workers. First, the supersession of men/women by robots even makes workers feel far more boring than before. While in the old days workers can say some words during working time or have a chat after work, now many workers have to face the manlike machines all day long. Furthermore, the replacement of human beings with robots might decrease the moral of factory workers. Many workers might lose their jobs because their former works are done by robots, while the rest of those luck workers might in a nervous situation for unexpected opportunities of unemployment. That will decrease their morale at best.

In conclusion, before addressing the conclusion to the mass of the public, the editor of the magazine should consider further questions. In fact, the successful experience of robots in outer space cannot apply to the industry unselectedly; the robots might also 'sick' as common workers, and even worse; the mechanization of factory might decrease the morale of workers and in turn decrease the output.

应该说除了B1我觉得有点问题之外，另外都没什么大问题。有什么觉得不妥的欢迎讨论。大家一起进步。

flyingwindUID: 189320

.[结尾的这句话不通，好象有语法错误。
这个上老外文章里的哦

[我觉得工厂流水线机器人是不是比空间机器人更便宜，更容易研制以及获得呢？比如说，美国“勇气”和“机遇”两个火星探测器耗费的是数以亿计的美圆；而当工厂流水线机器人的设计定下来后，规模化的生产并会有效的降低成本。反而是外太空探索所用的机器人由于各自目的的不同而需要单独研制。感觉你有点驳反了呢。]
你说的也是，但是我的也通，毕竟是argu有可能反驳的它都错，毕竟他是说“必定”，我门说“有可能”；
各个工厂不一顶批量生产，各个工作不一样，都用机器，又要好用。代价高，美国那个，全国不惜代价的。工厂要考虑价格/。


[可以用malfunction这个词。].
这个不错！


[有什么觉得不妥的欢迎讨论。大家一起进步]
群殴才好呢

staralwaysUID: 193479

毕竟是argu有可能反驳的它都错，毕竟他是说“必定”，我门说“有可能”
这说在点子上，毕竟反驳只要一个反例就行了。

mariaUID: 197971

To begin with, whether those robots are easily available is the first thing any executives of factories should consider. It is mentioned that the successful robots are those exploring outer space, which is of course paid may cost感觉读起来更顺一些myriads of resources可数名次吧 including money, human power, etc to design, maintain, considering the mission areis especially sophisticatedlyso sophisticated. Thus, it is understandable that those robots are successful. As to factory, different factory have distinctive demand to the design of robots, therefore?用which may更好点吧？ improve the price of them, which might not be affordable by the factories. Besides, query possibility whether there are companies or institutions are willing to help designsuch robots.

In addition, at first glance the robots never get sick, so the absenteeism would be reduced. Nevertheless, the general working of robots areis limited by several aspects. They should be fueledpowered by battery or electricity. So when the battery or electricity areis in short supply, they don'twill not work at all. Furthermore, they will also make 'mistakes' as workers. For example, due to mechanic flaws, robots may cease to function or function not conforming the design说得不地道. Those 'mistakes' can be detrimental to the factory. Moreover, robots are notas flexible as human beings. They perform routine actions as computer program has designed. When facing urgent problems they cannot response immediately as a worker. In short, robots, as machines in nature, may yield more 'absenteeism'absent than a common worker.

The last but not least,last but not least the author unfairly assume that those robots would receive applaud by workers so as to improve the moral of factory workers. First, the supersessionsubstitution of men/women by robots even makes workers feel far more boring than before. While in the old days workers can say some words during working time or have a chat after work, now many workers have to face the manlike machines all day long. Furthermore, the replacement of human beings with robots might decrease the moral of factory workers. Many workers might lose their jobs because their former works are done by robots, while the rest of those luck workers might in a nervous situation for unexpected opportunities of unemployment. That will decrease their morale at best.

In conclusion, before addressing the conclusion to the mass of the public, the editor of the magazine should consider further questions. In fact, the successful experience of robots in outer space cannot apply to the industry unselectedlyunselectively; the robots might also 'sick' as common workers, and even worse; the mechanization of factory might decrease the morale of workers and in turn decrease the output.
我觉得你的推理没有什么问题，语言导师还应该加强。有些地方读起来不顺另外注意些语法小错误，不管怎么说，比我的好多了楼主加油吧！

flyingwindUID: 189320

谢谢哈
一起加油！