- 最后登录
- 2008-9-12
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 2653
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-6-9
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1318
- UID
- 166492

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2653
- 注册时间
- 2004-6-9
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 2
|
起了个大早,赶了个晚集,不知道还有没有建设性了。别人说过的,就不说了啊
--题目--
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.
--正文--
Is the beginner more likely than the expert to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry as the speaker claims so? To answer this question, we should clarify what is the discrimination between the beginner and the expert? I believe that the difference between these two is just nothing but experience. Under the precondition, in my view, none of the beginner and the expert(后面应该用复数,因为前面有限定词) has a greater possibility of discovering something of importance than the other in any field of inquiry and they are in the same scratch line. 开头真的不错,点清楚了专家和新手的最大区别
To begin with, experience, the only difference between the beginner and the expert, plays a minor part in making important scientific discoveries. As we know, science is a realm to disclose the unknow (unknown)secret of the world. Deducing from common sense, we could hardly explain something of no precedence, such as scientific discoveries, with our experience.(你的潜台词是说common sense就是experience吗?我认为最好交代清楚) Therefore, experience is not a key factor to scientific discoveries. For supporting examples we need look no further than Einstein, who discovered many important secrets of physics(discover用的太多了). In Einstein's twenties, as a beginner of physics with little experience, he discovered the Relative Theory which shocked the whole physics academia . Twelve years after, when Einstein was already an expert in physics, he discovered the Photoelectric Effect for which he won the Novel Prize. Whether Einstein was a beginner or an expert, he made important discoveries. From Einstein, we can see that experience is not a key factor to the possibility of making discoveries. Therefore, the beginner and the expert has (have)the coequal opportunity to discover something of importance.
这一段没有很好的回应开头,而且完全抛开了新老手,有些混乱了吧。
Moreover, since the key factor is not experience, what is it on earth? I think that it is sound professional knowledge and a indomitable spirit. First, that sound professional knowledge is an essential is easy to be understood, after all, we cannot image that an individual knows nothing about a field of scientific inquiry can make any important discoveries. In addition, a indomitable(注意 an) spirit is also important to make important discoveries. As is pointed out above, the scientist's task is to explore the unknown secret of the world. During the inquriy, the scientist would encounter difficulties beyond imagine more or less. (我认为楼主的during用的有点乱)If the scientist has not(语法问题) a indomitable spirit, which I means(means 不是及物的啊, mean ) cannot insist to go foreword and overcome these difficulties, he can hardly make any important discoveries. For instance, Mrs. Curie, the mother of radium, spent nearly ten years on discovering the element radium, processing tons of material and refines only 0.1gram radium., incurs lots of difficulties. Without the unbeatable spirit it is impossible for Mrs. Curie to discover the element radium. Therefore, knowledge and an indomitable spirit is the primary factor to make important scientific discoveries. Once again, the beginner and the expert stand on the same scratch line.
In sum, form the discuss above, we can draw a conclusion that science is not a matter of experience means, a scientist who want to make important discoveries should be armed with sound professional knowledge and indomitable spirit. Thus none of the beginner and the expert is more likly to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry.
相比较前面来说,结尾有些逊色了,好的结尾应该是一个主题的升华。对不? |
|