issue87,各位好心人帮帮忙，看看吧！就要考了

hellenkittyUID: 201766

Is the beginner more likely than the expert to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry? I agree that beginners who lack experience are less likely to be fettered by rules; nevertheless, experts take more advantage of their all-round knowledge as well as ample experience, especially in the professional fields.

Admittedly, history illustrates that beginners can make crucial discoveries. Beginners are prone to be more creative than experts for their thoughts are unshackled by either tradition or fixed principles. Click, who shared the Nobel prize with Watson for their discovery of the DNA double-helix, is major in physics; however, he succeeded for his creatively applying a new method to the biological problem. After wining the prize, he admitted ( and I paraphrase) that it is because he is a beginner that he had the braveness to try a new way. On the other hand, beginners can also achieve in the process of learning. The former President Reagan was a Hollywood star and be aware of no politic affairs before he participated in the run for President, however, he is now remembered as one of the greatest leaders in American history for his master of power.   

Nonetheless, generally speaking, experts own more preponderance on their knowledge and experience. Knowledge is critical in every fields because any theory has to base on it. No one can expect a person of elementary mathematical level is capable to solve the Goldbach's conjecture. Instead, experts can be more experienced to tackle with such problems. For example, an experienced engineer is able to save a machine from danger simply by listening to the irregular sound it makes; while as an economic student, I often struck by the proper solution of a model, but my professor, who is much more fluent than those beginners, can easily guess the possible way to the ultimate outcome. He usually attributes his fluentness to the thousands of times of practice and the more cases encountered. Those examples indicate that after experiencing various situation and more opportunities to practice, experts are usually able to test the knowledge through practice while summarize their own experience.

For the professional fields, like surgery and theoretical science, where experience is especially critical, thus it is the experts, rather than the beginners, who are more probable to make distinguished discoveries. Cultivating an outstanding surgeon usually takes a long time besides the seven years in college, since he or she must have a good command of both the large amount of professional knowledge and mature skills to cope with any unexpected accident during operations. Otherwise, patients will hardly trust a doctor of no experience or formal training, let alone that he or she can make any discoveries. When it comes to the theoretical science, to understand those abstract theories as well as precise assumptions, as known to all, require not only an excellent mastery of the basic notions and examples but more importantly, skillful application of elementary theorems and profound understanding of the fundamental thoughts, which their further studies rely on. All the qualities mentioned above are what beginners can rarely attain, while experts, in this sense, are more well prepared to make considerable accomplishments.

In conclusion, although beginners can make crucial discoveries for their potential creativity, experts are generally more favored for their unique preponderance on experience and knowledge. In addition, professional areas such as surgery and theoretical science call for profound understanding of knowledge as well as abundant accumulation of examples, with which experts are endowed.

hellenkittyUID: 201766

自己顶一下，大家帮帮看看吧。。。

imjasonUID: 176604

占坐了，
现在在做实验,回头给你答复

imjasonUID: 176604

Is the beginner more likely than the expert to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry? I agree that beginners who lack experience are less likely to be fettered by rules; nevertheless, experts take more advantage of their all-round knowledge as well as ample experience, especially in the professional fields.

Admittedly, history illustrates that beginners can make crucial discoveries. Beginners are prone to be more creative than experts for their thoughts are unshackled by either tradition or fixed principles. Click, who shared the Nobel prize with Watson for their discovery of the DNA double-helix, is major这里语法有点问题吧，major有形容词形式么 in physics; however, he succeeded for his creatively applying a new method to the biological problem. After wining the prize, he admitted ( and I paraphrase) that it is because he is a beginner that he had the braveness to try a new way.我觉得这里有问题，因为前面用了admitted，那么从句中就应该是过去时吧 On the other hand, beginners can also achieveachieve什么 in the process of learning. The former President Reagan was a Hollywood star and be什么形式 aware of no politic affairs before he participated in the run for President, however, he is now remembered as one of the greatest leaders in American history for his master of power.

Nonetheless, generally speaking, experts own more preponderance on their knowledge and experience. Knowledge is critical in every fields because any theory has to base on it. No one can expect a person of elementary mathematical level is capable to solve the Goldbach's conjecture. Instead, experts can be more experienced to tackle with such problems. For example, an experienced engineer is able to save a machine from danger simply by listening to the irregular sound it makes; while as an economic student, I often struck by the proper solution of a model, but my professor, who is much more fluent than those beginners, can easily guess the possible way to the ultimate outcome. He usually attributes his fluentness to the thousands of times of practice and the more cases encountered. Those examples indicate that after experiencing various situation and more opportunities to practice, experts are usually able to test the knowledge through practice while summarize their own experience.这段很8错哦，PFPF啊。什么时候我也有这种水准就好了

For the professional fields, like surgery and theoretical science实验科学好象比理论科学更要经验吧, where experience is especially critical, thusfor是用做什么词啊，是介词么？句子不是很完整 it is the experts, rather than the beginners, who are more probable to make distinguished discoveries. Cultivating an outstanding surgeon usually takes a long time besides the seven years in college, since he or she must have a good command of both the large amount of professional knowledge and mature skills to cope with any unexpected accidents during operations. Otherwise, patients will hardly trust a doctor ofwith? no experience or formal training, let alone that he or she can make any discoveries. When it comes to the theoretical science, to understand those abstract theories as well as precise assumptions, as known to all, require not only an excellent mastery of the basic notions and examples but more importantly, skillful application of elementary theorems and profound understanding of the fundamental thoughts, which their further studies rely on. All the qualities mentioned above are what beginners can rarely attain, while experts, in thisopporsite? sense, are more well prepared to make considerable accomplishments.

In conclusion, although beginners can make crucial discoveries for their potential creativity, experts are generally more favored for their unique preponderance on experience and knowledge. In addition, professional areas such as surgery and theoretical science call for profound understanding of knowledge as well as abundant accumulation of examples, with which experts are endowed.
感觉你的文章很不错啊，今晚受打击啊，遇到的全是牛X级人物，都是我看了几遍也没找到什么错误的作文。放心了，以现在这个水平你的分数很高了。祝好运！

hellenkittyUID: 201766

变色前的文字。例如：<br>
A good tool.不如改为A useful/helpful tool.
Is the beginner more likely than the expert to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry? I agree that beginners who lack experience are less likely to be fettered by rules; nevertheless, experts take more advantage of their all-round knowledge as well as ample experience, especially in the professional fields.

Admittedly, history illustrates that beginners can make crucial discoveries. Beginners are prone to be more creative than experts for their thoughts are unshackled by either tradition or fixed principles. Click, who shared the Nobel prize with Watson for their discovery of the DNA double-helix, is major这里语法有点问题吧，major有形容词形式么 这是金山词霸上的解释哦：Of or relating to the field of academic study in which a student specializes.in physics; however, he succeeded for his creatively applying a new method to the biological problem. After wining the prize, he admitted ( and I paraphrase) that it is （was)because he is(was) a beginner that he had the braveness to try a new way.我觉得这里有问题，因为前面用了admitted，那么从句中就应该是过去时吧 不好意思啊，我老是写着写就忘了On the other hand, beginners can also achieveachieve什么 in the process of learning. The former President Reagan was a Hollywood star and be（was)什么形式谢谢指正 aware of no politic affairs before he participated in the run for President, however, he is now remembered as one of the greatest leaders in American history for his master of power. 昨天查了一下，里根在当总统前还干过2届州长，第1次竞选总统还没选上，这个例子重新改了一下：The former President Reagan was a Hollywood star and wasaware of no politic affairs before he participated in the run for Chief Executive, however, when he was nominated President, he shows a good mastery of power.

Nonetheless, generally speaking, experts own more preponderance on their knowledge and experience. Knowledge is critical in every fields because any theory has to base on it. No one can expect a person of elementary mathematical level is capable to solve the Goldbach's conjecture. Instead, experts can be more experienced to tackle with such problems. For example, an experienced engineer is able to save a machine from danger simply by listening to the irregular sound it makes; while as an economic student, I often struck by the proper solution of a model, but my professor, who is much more fluent than those beginners, can easily guess the possible way to the ultimate outcome. He usually attributes his fluentness to the thousands of times of practice and the more cases encountered. Those examples indicate that after experiencing various situation and more opportunities to practice, experts are usually able to test the knowledge through practice while summarize their own experience.这段很8错哦，PFPF啊。什么时候我也有这种水准就好了

For the professional fields, like surgery and theoretical science实验科学好象比理论科学更要经验吧,（ where ）experience is especially critical, thusfor是用做什么词啊，是介词么？句子不是很完整 哎，我怎么老是句子一些长就乐不思蜀了..it is the experts, rather than the beginners, who are more probable to make distinguished discoveries. Cultivating an outstanding surgeon usually takes a long time besides the seven years in college, since he or she must have a good command of both the large amount of professional knowledge and mature skills to cope with any unexpected accidents during operations. Otherwise, patients will hardly trust a doctor ofwith? no experience or formal training, let alone that he or she can make any discoveries. When it comes to the theoretical science, to understand those abstract theories as well as precise assumptions, as known to all, require not only an excellent mastery of the basic notions and examples but more importantly, skillful application of elementary theorems and profound understanding of the fundamental thoughts, which their further studies rely on. All the qualities mentioned above are what beginners can rarely attain, while experts, in thisopporsite? sense, are more well prepared to make considerable accomplishments.另外能说一下为什么实验科学更要经验吗？　

In conclusion, although beginners can make crucial discoveries for their potential creativity, experts are generally more favored for their unique preponderance on experience and knowledge. In addition, professional areas such as surgery and theoretical science call for profound understanding of knowledge as well as abundant accumulation of examples, with which experts are endowed.
感觉你的文章很不错啊，今晚受打击啊，遇到的全是牛X级人物，都是我看了几遍也没找到什么错误的作文。放心了，以现在这个水平你的分数很高了。祝好运！
呵呵，这是我这几天听到的最好的话了！我的文章一直都写不长，经常被同学打击的。呵呵，我会加油的，谢谢你噢！