- 最后登录
- 2009-3-14
- 在线时间
- 133 小时
- 寄托币
- 16357
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2003-2-12
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 14
- 精华
- 9
- 积分
- 4273
- UID
- 125249
  
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 16357
- 注册时间
- 2003-2-12
- 精华
- 9
- 帖子
- 14
|
In nowadays society which alters amazingly, video camera has been a prevailing way to record the events. Comparing with the written records, it could be more accurate and swift to demonstrate situation, however, written records possess the advantage to recall the happening and the author’s spirit. It is unfeasible for anyone to get a conclusion which would be more significant form of documentation. [the last sentence is a little weird]
This is indeed the case that video camera record could provide direct and accurate information to audience, since it could not be influence [d] by the subjective adjustment. What it recorded is the real situation, figure and material substance. The audiences then receive the information which is the image and sound, the most direct expression in the world, without any imagination. On the contrary, the written record will inevitably, inextricably and inescapably [有D野哦~呵呵] evoke some misleading for the author’s prejudice and preference. Even the author could describe what he/she saw in a neutral position. The gap between the author and the audience’ understanding could not be jumped over. The author translates what his/her memory into words and character and the audience penetrates it with their own experience, which arises discrepancy or imagination For example, when people introduce others a place where they have never been, it is difficult for the receiver to imagine accurately what do the constructions, the landscape, the custom and costume like, even there are some comparing [a little problem in the sentence] . Nothing could be better to demonstrate the photos and the video camera record to the receivers.
Notwithstanding, the sad truth is that we could not record the entire happening with the camera, as the case that we could not live in a world where the cameras are focus on individual all the time. People could recall the memory to write a record, but they could not recall it to create a video camera record as a documentary. On the contrary [change] , the written records seem to be easier to handle. Where there are a people [u use are but then appear "a"] , there could be a record, whatever that have happen a minute before or ten years ago, though it is inaccurate in some extent. As the example that, so many accidents occur in the world, most of them, the police could only detect through the beholders’ restatement.
Furthermore, when it comes to the abstract theory and the concluded summary, camera record seems unavailable. The thinking, the logic reason and the human mind, which is the human wisdom, could not be reflected simply [simply reflected] through the substance in the world, which is the camera could record [check it yourself] . It is the truth universally acknowledged that the materialism could not be interpreted by some images. It is the written record which is the direct description of author wisdom. Not precise as the understanding of audiences, it has exceeded the ability of video camera record. [i dont quite catch your point in the last sentence]
In sum, the video camera record and the written record have [change] their own advantage and disadvantage [merits and demerits] in different [distinctive] realm. In the material world, video record seem more accurate, however, in the spiritual world, written record appear more precise [you fail to prove it in B2~] . Both of them are important [change] in human being society
[yep,the point you caught is quite well, but were you more profound, your argument would be more convincing] |
|