- 最后登录
- 2008-9-12
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 2653
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-6-9
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1318
- UID
- 166492

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2653
- 注册时间
- 2004-6-9
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 2
|
No.1 issue30 这回还不算太迟,老规矩,互拍砖头吧!
The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time.
提纲:毫无疑问,追求人的高效率应该是技术进步的根本目的,但高效的结果却未必带来更多的闲暇时间。
B1,因为由技术进步所引起的高效率是令人们受益的前提,其它大部分的便利都是由此衍生而出的,因此它应当是技术进步的主要目的。
B2,但即便获得了高效率,这并不代表人们一定能享受更多的闲暇时光。
b1,人们要花更多的时间学习
b2,闲暇时间的多少也不是主要由人们的工作效率决定的。
结论:高效率应该是技术进步的主要目的,但不必然带来更充裕的时间。
As the tide of technology goes forward by leaps and bounds, never in any era of history was our society improved so much as it is today. When satisfying with the accomplishment achieved, people at the same time, begin to pay their attention to questions, what is the most significant aim of the advancement of technology and whether it will bring us more time freely dominated. As far as I am concerned, increasing people's efficiency, without doubt, should be the primary goal of technological advancement, however, it may not lead to more leisure time necessarily.最后这一句组织的不错,把意思说清楚了
On the one hand, the prior aim of progress in technology should lie in making people efficient, because many other further benifits, brought by the appearance of new technology or the improvement of the old, are based on high efficiency. In other words, just under the prerequisit of this efficiency,a result of technological innovation, we step in a more convenient world than before. For example,by airplanes, people can arrive at another continent in just hours, which helps them get rid of a boring time-wasting journy for ever; for the use of computers, so greatly have scientists enhanced their speed in calculation that they can spend the time saved on other researches in order to abtain more significant achievement; with washing machines dominating each family, even ouselves,as the beneficiaries of high efficiency, are greatly liberated for being away from doing laudaries by our own. All of the above illustrate a fact nearly every positive change coming along with the breakthrough of technology comes from high efficiency. Thus it should be the improvement of people's efficiency,rather than others, that become the prior aim of technological advancement.
呵呵,不是报复呕!!1, fact, such as computer, washing machines,->change =>it should be our aims ?? aim 是一个目标,我理解成一个源动力,不是因为他们的结果而就是这个目标,不能说因为你学习后得到了好成绩,因此成绩好就是你的一个目标。 而是说,成绩好对你重要,因此你的目标应该是成绩好,这里我的思路也开阔了。不是说是不是,而是说为什么是
On the other hand, nevertheless, far from inevitability do people enjoy more leisure time for their higher efficiency. For one thing, in spite of saving more time for being more efficient节省时间为效率,似乎不通???, people carry it out at the cost of spending longer time in learning and practising to improve themselves. For example, for using a new skill, a worker can produce a car in half of the time as that used before , while it takes them hours more than hundreds of times to master it, as well as to update his or her knowledge and improve the skill, making the leisure time less in fact. For the other thing,as professor Liu, an authority of sociology in my univercity, once said( and I paraphrased ), 这样说到是很聪明,呵呵"Seldom is the amount of leisure time determined by his or her speed of finishing a task, but based on his or her nature and pursuit."That is to say,if one wants to burden a lot, he or she, though efficient, will still be busy, since there are always a plenty of work to do; while being a lazy fellow, however slowly he or she works, there remains quite a little leisure, for only a few tasks appear in the plan. Therefore, high efficiency may not bring much leisure time.
建议你发上来之前把错字都改一下,这个例子似乎用的不太妥当。你说学习,但是学习和效率之间是什么关系呢?而且你开头的第一句叙述的并不清楚,for higer efficiency 还是因为,为了,表示因为时一般放在前面
In sum, from what has been stated above, we can draw a conlusion that as the basis what benefits our socity, high efficiency of people should certainly be the fudamental goal of technological development. Besides,what also must be pointed out here is that this high efficiency does not result in more leisure time of people inevitably, by contrast, making them busier very likely.
还是那句,不同意把题目分成两部分,即使两部分也要有主有次,这毕竟不是比较的题目,中心只能有一个,要么efficiency, or leisure time. |
|