- 最后登录
- 2009-10-10
- 在线时间
- 32 小时
- 寄托币
- 2073
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-21
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 12
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1906
- UID
- 201813
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2073
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-21
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 12
|
发表于 2005-4-18 10:20:16
|显示全部楼层
4.14上财考的,感觉机井还是很有用,我个人认为大家肯定没有很多时间去准备,因此都不可能真正提高英语写作能力,大部分是应试,就此而言15天绰绰有余了,因此感觉模版很重要。我准备的模版就刚好考到了。与大家分享。
[B]ISSUE:[/B]
[I]Agree/Disagree with exceptions写法:(以186为主题)[/I]
In today’s advanced technological world is practicality our idol—one which all powers, talents and resources should serve, as the speaker maintains? While this claim has some considerable merits with respect to most areas of human endeavor—including education, art, business, and politics, I take exception with the claim when it comes to the direction of scientific research today. My view can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below.
First consider the education and art areas…
Next consider the areas of business and politics…
However, the speaker’s claim amounts to an overstatement when it comes to today's scientific endeavors…
To sum up, practicality may be our idol today when it comes to education, art, business, and politics; but with respect to scientific fields I find the claim to be an unfair generalization; to maintain the development of our society we should make long-term (far-reaching, provident) scientific plans that will benefit ourselves and our offspring. Therefore, more factors intertwine to form an organic whole and thus make the conclusion I support become more persuasive.
[I]Agree/Disagree写法:(以186为主题)[/I]
Can discovery and progress be made only through mistakes, as the speaker maintains? As a matter of fact, this issue is a complex and controversial one. Different people can hold different opinions due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is no universal answer to this question. As far as I am concerned, I strongly agree with the speaker’s claim for two reasons. First, it accords with our personal experiences; secondly, history informs us that on a social level trial and error provides the very foundation for discovery and true progress in all realms of human endeavor. My view can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below in detail.
One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker (has to do with) is that our personal experiences tell us it is through many mistakes that we can grow up step by step…
Another reason why I essentially agree with the speaker is that on a social level any great discovery and real progress are based on frequent trial and error…for example…
Moreover, the value of trial and error is not limited to the sciences. In government and politics, progress usually comes about through dissension and challenge…
To sum up, due to the above-mentioned reasons, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any single of them, we may safely reach the conclusion that only through mistakes can discovery and progress be made.
[I]Case-by-case 写法:(以36为主题)[/I]
Can a person's greatness be recognized only in retrospect, by those who live after him, as the speaker maintains? In my view, however, the author unfairly generalizes. Whether a person's greatness is decided by his contemporaries or by later generations must be determined on a case-by-case basis. In some areas, especially the arts and politics, greatness is often recognizable in its nascent stages. However, in other areas, particularly the physical and astronomical sciences, greatness must be tested over time before it can be confirmed. Admittedly, there are some areas, such as the business, in which a person's greatness can be recognized either by his contemporaries or by later generations under different conditions. My view can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below.
First consider the arts and politics areas…
Next consider the areas of physical and astronomical sciences…
Finally, consider the special area of business…
To sum up, whether a person's greatness is decided by his contemporaries or by those who live after him should never be determined indiscriminately. In stead, one should make such decision about a person’s greatness on a case-by-case basis, considering the field of his occupation. Therefore, some factors intertwine to form an organic whole and thus make the conclusion I support become more persuasive.
[B]
Argument:[/B]
First of all, the author bases his claim partly on the fact that… However, it is possible that… Without ruling out such possibility, the author could hardly defend his claim based upon this evidence.
…renders the conclusion based upon it highly suspect (unfair).
…the disparity in sales volume can readily be explained by factors other than…
Secondly, to further support his claim the author unfairly assumes that... However, the author provides no evidence to indicate that… Moreover, the argument overlooks the strong possibility that… is not the only factor affecting how... [Since the author has not adequately responded to this concern, his claim that… is untenable.] √
Other such factors might include...
Finally, in support of his claim the author cites a recent survey in which… However, the survey is too simple. The mayor provides no evidence that the survey's respondents are representative of the overall group of people whose… Lacking such evidence, it is entirely possible that ... In short, without better evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the mayor cannot rely on it to draw any firm conclusions. √
In sum, the argument fails to validate the conclusion that… To solidify the argument, the author needs provide clear (direct) evidence… Besides, to better access the argument, more information about the survey should be provided in detail. |
|