寄托天下
查看: 937|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] ISSUE83 砸我吧! [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
293
注册时间
2005-5-25
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-7-21 23:56:42 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
ISSUE 83 (高频)
"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
政府应该保留国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区,即使这些地区往往人迹罕至。

--ABSTRACT--
21:48-22:30 写的很痛苦的说 这个题目虽然看过,但是提纲没有准备充分。
(7处拼写错误,447 words)

--OUTLINE--
1. 有些地方需要保留,有些地方需要开发。首先,从文化层面,有些地方需要保留,比如古迹
2. 然后从自然层面,保护濒临灭绝的动物,为他们提供生存的空间,保护生态平衡,从而拯救我们人类自己。
3. 从政治层面,国家要搞实验,有军事的,有科技的,比如核试验,军事演习,卫星发射,太空梭发射的地方应该预留,人迹罕至才对。
4. 然而,有一些地方,比如由于人类破坏环境导致的沙漠什么的,就要尽快的开发和转化,而不是保留,这样才有利于人类的发展。

--正文--
Should governments preserve the publicly owned wilderness areas which are extremely remote and few people access them? The author claims so, while in my opinion, a balance view should be taken out, some wilderness areas should be protected for civilization, nature and politics aim, however, others should be developed after overall evaluation.

To begin with, for civilization purpose, the wilderness areas with ancient building and ancestor trails should be preserved. The ancient building is the sign of ancient civilization, although there are books and historic materials which could also reflect history, it is another different way to explain the ancient life in another angle. Like Qin Palace which located in far west in China , since time flows, the buildings are already empty and few people access them. But it stands for the civilization of Qin dynasty, describe the scene that what the life in Qin dynasty is like.

Secondly, from natural aspect, some wilderness areas are preserved for saving the wild animals and natural balance. Since the industrial revolution, many factories are built here and there without planning for the nature. The serious problems--Pollution--more and more regularly need individuals face them, as a mater of fact, more and more species extinct in the world. Thus, the situation needs change to protect the wild animals which are merely extinct, the wildness areas which contain wild natural system could well solve the problems and apply a home to the wild animals and our human being to some extent. There are already many wild animal protection areas in many nations all around the world, even so, more this kind of areas are needed as well.

Thirdly, a kind of wilderness areas are used for political aims. Nations always preserve some areas that nobody live there to do some military affairs experiments such as nuclear experiments, also some technological experiments, like satellite sending and space-transfer sending. Such as the Kennedy Space Center in USA and Xichang Satellite Sending Center in China.

On the other hand, there are also some wilderness places need development rather than preservation. Human did not protect the world well since the environment is so bad for us living, many enrichment fields are turned into desert because the soil will sand if the trees grow there are cut down and thus can not be held. The fields like that need not be preserved but developed immediately.

To sum up, the conclusion need to be well evaluated from two big aspects: preservation needed and preservation not needed, and many aspects in details of the two big parts. Simply put, government should preserve the wildness areas which are useful and develop the others immediately for better usage.

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-7-22 at 00:04 ]
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=300669
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

声望
45
寄托币
32546
注册时间
2005-1-25
精华
17
帖子
749

Capricorn摩羯座 荣誉版主

沙发
发表于 2005-8-6 18:10:39 |只看该作者
"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."

Should governments preserve the publicly owned wilderness areas which are extremely remote and few people access [to] them? The author claims so, while in my opinion, a balance view should be taken out, some wilderness areas should be protected for civilization, nature and politics aim, however, others should be developed after overall evaluation. [提出观点很明确。]

To begin with, for civilization purpose, the wilderness areas with ancient building and ancestor trails should be preserved. The ancient building is the sign of ancient civilization, although there are books and historic materials which could also reflect history, it is another different way to explain the ancient life in another angle. Like Qin Palace which located in far west in China, since time flows, the buildings are already empty and few people access [to] them. But it stands for the civilization of Qin dynasty, describe the scene that what the life in Qin dynasty is like. [可以稍微论述下诸如“如果不加以保护会有什么样的后果”之类的,这样使论述更为充分、完整。]

Secondly, from natural aspect, some wilderness areas are preserved for saving the wild animals and natural balance. Since the industrial revolution, many factories are built here and there without planning for the nature. The serious problems--Pollution--more and more regularly need individuals face them, as a mater of fact, more and more species extinct in the world. Thus, the situation needs change to protect the wild animals which are merely extinct [from extincting], the wildness areas which contain wild natural system could well solve the problems and apply a home to the wild animals and our human being to some extent. There are already many wild animal protection areas in many nations all around the world, even so, more this kind of areas are needed as well.

Thirdly, a kind of wilderness areas are used for political aims. Nations always preserve some areas that nobody live there to do some military affairs experiments such as nuclear experiments, also some technological experiments, like satellite sending and space-transfer sending. Such as the Kennedy Space Center in USA and Xichang Satellite Sending Center in China.

On the other hand, there are also some wilderness places need development rather than preservation. Human did not protect the world well since the environment is so bad for us living, many enrichment fields are turned into desert because the soil will sand if the trees grow there are cut down and thus can not be held. The fields like that need not be preserved but developed immediately.

To sum up, the conclusion need to be well evaluated from two big aspects: preservation needed and preservation not needed, and many aspects in details of the two big parts. Simply put, government should preserve the wildness areas which are useful and develop the others immediately for better usage.

文章的构思很好;但是感觉每一段的份量还不太够。
Love, is always a star in the foggy dawn......

寄托博客:爱似晨星

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE83 砸我吧! [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE83 砸我吧!
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-304050-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部