issue70 G-89-互助社-8月12日同主题写作 请拍

jason0926UID: 200697

70.In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.


In many countries, an election of president will be held every several years  
because people hope that in virtue of the election, the new leader will bring  
them good policies to bring more profits and improve the country's  
development. I strongly agree that the leaders whose in power should step down after some years--absolute power leads absolute corruption. However, it is  
not fit for any profession, especially for business.

In the first place, when leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power. Human is not perfect and so is the leader. Every leader  
has own desires, interests and dreams. When a leader pay more attention on  
personal desires, he or she will lose his or her belief to make benefits to  
people, at that time, he or she will not think about anything except personal  benefits. Certainly, people do not allow him or her to continue to hold the  
position, he or she will be abdicate his power compelled. For example, Saddam  
Hussein, the president of Iraq, make many mistakes in his reign including  
abusing his power for personal profits, oppressing his people without mercy,  
having war with other countries. Finally, with the help of other countries,  
the Iraq people overset his dominion. So the best way to solve these problems  
about power and corruption is revitalization through new leadership.

In the second place, a new leadership usually has greater initiative and would bring in new ideas. There is an old adage in China," new official has three  
firebrands." It means that a new leader has new decision and policy when he  
take a post. Because every leader has different ideas, the effects he brings  
to people are also different. For example, when Clinton takes the position of  
the president, he inclined to improve the country's economy and make more  
profits to people while Bush take the position, he would like to produce war  
with other countries. So we can see the different results in their reigns:  
Clinton improve the level of economy and make more profits to people, even in  
his reign, the finance deficit of U.S.A has disappeared, but Bush brings more  
calamities to both other countries' people like Iraq and native people such as 911. Therefore, it will exhibit different effects when dissimilar leaders are  
in reign.

However, in private areas such as business, it might not be so necessary to  
limit the term of leadership. Because all of the property belongs to  
individual, the leader can not send the property to other strange people, so,  
in most private companies, the position of leadership is hereditary. Moreover, in order to cherish the fruits they created and maintain the flourish of whole family, these leaders can only choose their progenitures to inherit the  
property rather than a stranger.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may draw the conclusion that  
the best way to success for some enterprises and countries is revitalization  
through new leadership. we must  remember that absolute power leads absolute  
corruption, in order to prevent and reduce the phenomena of corruption, we can utilize this method.

huangdaoUID: 190018

In many countries, an election of president will be held every several years because people hope that in virtue of the election, the new leader will bring them good policies to bring more profits and improve the country's development这句话说得绝对了一点，不一定吧 . I strongly agree that the leaders whose in power should step down after some years--absolute power leads absolute corruption 好！. However, it is  not fit for any profession, especially for business.

In the first place, when leaders have no fear of？for losing their power, they tend to abuse their power. Human is not perfect and so is the leader. Every leader has own desires, interests and dreams. When a leader pay more attention on？to personal desires, he or she will lose his or her belief to make benefits to people, at that time, he or she will not think about anything except personal  benefits. Certainly, people do not allow him or her to continue to hold the position, he or she will be abdicate his power compelled. For example, Saddam Hussein, the president of Iraq, make many mistakes in his reign including abusing his power for personal profits, oppressing his people without mercy, having war with other countries. Finally, with the help of other countries, the Iraq people overset his dominion. So one of the best way to solve these problems about power and corruption is revitalization through new leadership.

In the second place, a new leadership usually has greater initiative and would bring in new ideas. 没说清楚好还是不好 There is an old adage in China," new official has three firebrands?是这样说的吗？不太清楚." It means that a new leader has new decision and policy when he take a post. Because every leader has different ideas, the effects he brings to people are also different. For example, when Clinton takes the position of the president, he inclined to improve the country's economy and make more profits to people while Bush take the position, he would like to produce war with other countries. So we can see the different results in their reigns: Clinton improve the level of economy and make more profits to people, even in his reign, the finance deficit of U.S.A has disappeared, but Bush brings more calamities to both other countries' people like Iraq and native people such as 911. Therefore, it will exhibit different effects when dissimilar leaders are in reign.

我感觉你这段有很大问题，应该是说轮任有利于国家发展，但是论述出来，感觉后任还不如前任呢，是不是有点自相矛盾？

However, in private areas such as business, it might not be so necessary to limit the term of leadership. Because all of the property belongs to individual, the leader can not send the property to other strange people, so, in most private companies, the position of leadership is hereditary. Moreover, in order to cherish the fruits they created and maintain the flourish of whole family, these leaders can only choose their progenitures to inherit the property rather than a stranger.

这一段也是有点问题，家族产业只是经济中的一部分，而且传给后代是不是也算是轮任呢？讨论的是继承的问题，和连任的关系很小 感觉上

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may draw the conclusion that  the best way to success for some enterprises and countries is revitalization through new leadership. we must  remember that absolute power leads absolute corruption, in order to prevent and reduce the phenomena of corruption, we can utilize this method.

好像 结尾只是复述开头，没有联系各段啊

有空帮我拍拍吧
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=317033