9.15鼎钧机经，我的机考纪实

shj80929UID: 198047

Argument97  第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：30分17秒     640 words
从2005年8月7日22时41分到2005年8月7日23时30分
------题目------
The following appeared in a memo from the manager of television station KICK.
'A nationwide survey reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. After television station WACK increased its sports broadcasts, its share of the television audience in its viewing area almost doubled. To gain a larger audience share in our area, and thus increase company profits, KICK should also revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage.'
------正文------
The author contains that, to increase the company’s profits, KICK should also revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage. He posits his point on the following standpoints. (1) The nationwide survey reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. (2) The television station WACK's audience almost doubled after it increased its sports broadcasts. At the first glance, the author's viewpoints seem reasonable and rational. After a careful scrutiny, the author's contention is not valid. There are a myriad of flaws which render the contention neither reliable nor valid.

In the first place, the author assume that the KICK will make a profit if it cover more sports games according to the nationwide survey which reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. However, the author forgets that the nationwide survey can not represent the condition of the KICK. It is possible that the KICK is a exception of the national survey and it is not the same as the other part of the nation. Furthermore, the survey shows that it is man who is interested in the sports. However, it is not only man that is in the world. There are a lot of people who are not men, such as women, children and the old. Without their reaction, the survey is not valid and the contention based on the survey is also invalid.

Furthermore, the author assumes that the KICK will make a profit if it covers more sports according to the situation of the WACK. The television station WACK increased its sports broadcasts and thus the audience in its viewing area almost doubled. But this material is not reasonable. It is possible that other television stations also increases the audience's quality without the increasing of the sports. This shows that the method of increasing sports will not valid because we can not distinct what is the real reason for the increase of the audiences. In addition, the increase of the audience is not necessarily in the sports area. It is possible that the increasing audience quality is because of the increase of other fields. Furthermore, it is also possible the increase of audience is just thanks to the increase of the population. If this is the case, the author's sentiments of increasing the sports subjects will be minor compared to other methods. In addition, the author must also prove that the situation in the KICK is the same as the condition in the WACK. Without this proof, I can never agree with the author.

Last but not least, the author believes that to increase the profit, the company should increase the sports coverage. However, this can hardly hold the water. We must consider the revenue and the cost of the sports coverage. It is highly possible that the increase of the cost in the coverage of the sports will surpass the increase of the profit and if this is true, the company will never make a profit for the increase of the sports.

In conclusion, the author based his sentiments on several invalid and ungrounded points which render the whole contention unreasonable and unsound. To make the conclusion more persuasive, the author must make the following improvement. The author must prove the KICK has the same condition as the whole nation and the men who are survey can represent all the people in the KICK including the women, the children and the old. The author must also prove that the increase of audience in the WACK is due to the increase in the sports coverage and the condition in the KICK is the same as the condition in the WACK. Furthermore, the author also must prove that the increase in the audience will bring about more profit in the city instead of decrease the profit of the whole.

shj80929UID: 198047

一定要挺住，快考了，加油呀！I believe I can fly, I believe I can touch the sky!

shj80929UID: 198047

Issue103  第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：35分51秒     713 words
从2005年8月8日15时34分到2005年8月8日16时35分
------题目------
The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives.
------正文------
History is the relict of our lives and it is of high value. Some people hold that the study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives, while others do not agree with it. I, personally, believe that history is valuable to us whether it is relevant to our lives or not.

First and foremost, history is valuable for us in the social respects. Considering the momentous events in the history, they are especially important because we can learn something from it and avoid to make the same mistake when it comes to the social lives. The World War 2 is a good example. We learn from it that we should always be aware of the jingoism and the chauvinism whenever it is and whatever it is. Thus, the contemporary leaders are always alert to these kinds of matters and they try to build a peaceful and friendly atmosphere for the development of the society and the earth. This thing seems irrelevant to us at the first blush, but after the careful scrutiny of the matter, we can see that they are closely connected with our everyday lives. Without the peaceful and harmonious atmosphere, no one can make a minor progress even if he had the gifted talent. In the war times, the talented scientists can never make any contributions to the society for the chaos and the trouble brought by the war. Nobel decreased his research in the World War 2 for the trouble brought by the war. Therefore, we can see that the events that seems irrelevant to us are, in fact, closely relevant to us. The study of this kind of history will be absolutely paramount for us, especially for the promising leaders.

Furthermore, in the scientific field, the study of history will have important value for us all. Without the absorption of the ancient time technology and science, we can never make further progress. The more we learn from our ancestors, the more we will get. The stream engine is the footstone for the invention of the electricity and the electricity is the headstone for the development of the whole society. Because of the development of the momentum, our society can make further progress. In today, the development of the computer technology is the foundation for the further and rapid development of the society. Nowadays, even the little children can also use the mouse and type the words, long before he can hold a pencil. The computer had made our lives efficient and convenient. We can search for the information and technology on the internet easily and rapidly. In this way, we must admit that the absorb of the information and knowledge of our ancestors are important for the development of our society, that is, the study of the history is valuable for us at any times and any places. The study of history is important for us, but it is not according to the relevance of it.

When it comes to the everyday life, the study of history will become especially important. We can never make the big progress without the study of history. History is the mirror of us and we can learn the knowledge and experience that we will never experience in the everyday lives. We can learn the study method and thinking method of Newton without going to the mid-century times. We can learn the fascinating love without going to the titanic times and without experiencing the real lives in their times. We can learn the history events and learn from it without going to that time. All these things are thank to the history. Nevertheless, history is the record of our lives and we can always learn from them, either experience or knowledge. The life of Einstein can incite our invention excitement. The life of Hillary can make us thinking about the women's talent. The life of Clinton can make us more careful about the personal life. These are all the experiences that we can learn without experiencing it.

In summary, the study of history is vital for us. Its role is not depended on the relevance to our daily lives. Thus, we should do our best to learn from these histories and be a good-learning person.

shj80929UID: 198047

Argument140  第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：29分35秒     745 words
从2005年8月8日16时24分到2005年8月8日16时29分
------题目------
The following appeared in a report of the Committee on Faculty Promotions and Salaries at Elm City University.
'During her seventeen years as a professor of botany, Professor Thomas has proved herself to be well worth her annual salary of $50,000. Her classes are among the largest at the university, demonstrating her popularity among students. Moreover, the money she has brought to the university in research grants has exceeded her salary in each of the last two years. Therefore, in consideration of Professor Thomas' demonstrated teaching and research abilities, we recommend that she receive a $10,000 raise and a promotion to Department Chairperson; without such a raise and promotion, we fear that Professor Thomas will leave Elm City University for another college.'
------正文------
The author believes that they should give Professor Thomas a reward of $10,000 and a promotion to Department Chairperson to avoid the leave of her. The author based his argument on the following standpoints. (1) Professor Thomas's class is among the largest at the university and this demonstrated her popularity among students. (2) She had brought a large sum of money to the university in research grants which had exceeded her salary. (3) Without the raise in the salary and the promotion, Professor Thomas will leave Elm City University for another college. At the first blush, the contention seems reasonable and sound, but after the careful scrutiny, we can find that there are a myriad of flaws and shortcomings which render the sentiment neither convincing nor reliable.

First and foremost, the author assumes that the size of the class in relevant to the popularity of a professor. However, this assumption is unwarranted and unreliable. It is highly possible that the class she was teaching are the compulsory class and the students must study it even if they do not like it. If this is true, the author's viewpoints that Professor Thomas are popular among the students is unwarranted and it is probably that she does not deserve the money she had gotten. Maybe another professor will be more talent and more responsible for this position and Professor Thomas does not worth the salary she had got.

Furthermore, the author thinks that the money she had brought to the university in research grants has exceeded her salary in each of the last two years. It is highly possible that other professors also brought a big grant which had also exceeded their salaries and maybe they had brought about more money than Professor Thomas according to the salary level. If this is the case, the author will never make a sense to raise the salary of Professor Thomas. Furthermore, even if Professor Thomas really brought more money in the last two years, we can never say that it is her accomplishment considering her teaching years. It is highly possible that she had brought more money in the last two year just because there is a development of economy and the increase is just a small part considering the rapid development of economy.

Thirdly, the author amount the size of the class and the grant that she had got to the teaching and research abilities of the professor. Yet, it is not the case according to the present situation. We must the teaching ability and the research ability is relevant to the articles and the research accomplishment of a professor instead of the money they get. Considering this, we can never say that the Professor Thomas is a good professor and has a high teaching and research abilities.

Last but not least, the author posits that Professor Thomas will stay at the school if we give her a increase in salary and a promotion in position. Yet, this is not the case. The author bases his assumption on the following stand that Professor Thomas will leave the college if we do not give her the promotion and a higher salary. Maybe Professor Thomas wants to teach in Elm City University because of the harmonious atmosphere, the peaceful teaching environment, the research desire and so for. If this is true, she will stay in the school even if we do not give her the promotion and the increase of salary. It is also possible that the professor is already satisfied with her present salary and she think that there is no need to give a promotion. It is also possible that the Professor Thomas is concerned with the research and does not consider much of the management. If this is the case, the promotion to the Department Chairperson will impede the research of the Professor Thomas and this will make her less likely to stay in this university for the promotion. Thus, the author's contention will be invalid when it comes to this matter.

In summary, I can hardly agree with the author without the fulfillment of his viewpoints. To convince me, the author must show that the class size is relevant to the popularity of a professor. The author must prove that the grants can show a professor's research and teaching ability. The author must show that Professor Thomas is concerned with the salary and the promotion. Before the author can prove these things, I can hardly agree with the author.

playstation_htUID: 2134564

你真的好强啊  
能写这么多字
相信你肯定能好成绩的阿

shj80929UID: 198047

要是能考好就好了，谢谢你的祝福，有时间的话欢迎拍几砖。

win-szUID: 2113066

次这么多文章砸上来，真的吓着我了，太多了，改到什么时候呀？建议一次放一篇上来:$

看你能够写这么多，就知道你一定能够触摸天空，到达胜利的！祝福你！

有空我要好好修改！

shj80929UID: 198047

Issue83  第1篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：35分23秒     692 words
从2005年8月8日20时56分到2005年8月8日21时35分
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
The problem of protecting the natural environment is a momentous matter and required a myriad of concern. When it comes to this matter, different people have diverse opinions. Some people posit that there is no need to protect the remote and obsolete area for there are little people who will go there. On the other hand, some people hold that we should protect the remote area in their natural state for it is a part of the natural environment. As far as this matter is concerned, personally, I believe that we should protect the remote area even if there is little people.

First and foremost, the wild area is an essential part of our environment and we can never live without them. To protect the environment is a part of the obligation of the government. The natural environment is a section of the ecological chain and need to be protected. If it is in a good condition, it is more likely for the development of the society. For example, according to the Theory of Evolution, the weak part is always the food of the strong ones. If we do not  protect these animals and plants, it is likely that they will disappear in the near future and this will be a loss for us all. In fact, the human had already aware of this matter and established a lot of natural protection regions. For example, The Yellow Stone Park, The Chinese National Protection Regions, and so forth are all the protect method employed by the human. The dead valley is a natural spectacle that we should protect for its beautiful and mysterious state even though we can not detect and learn it at present. With the study and the research about these kinds of environment, people will have more knowledge about the unexplored area and thus, get more knowledge about them.

Furthermore, protecting the natural environment can also bring about a plethora of benefit for the people. There are some remote areas which had benefited from the protection method and became the rich regions. For instance, in China, a lot of remote and lag-behind areas have become the rich regions thanks to the protection policy. These regions make a big profit for the travel and tourist. Because people had made the environment beautiful and fresh, the citizen will be willing to go there to get some relaxation and refreshment. This is especially true when it comes to the tourist industry.

Thirdly, to protect the natural environment in its natural state will need some money and some people and this will provide a myriad of employment opportunities. This will benefit the local people and give them more chances to develop.

Fourthly, protecting these areas will give us the chance to learn about the nature in its natural state. Scientists will have the opportunities to learn about the wild lives. This will absolutely benefit people in the long run. Through the research of the wild life, people will get more knowledge about the development of the animals and the plants and this will give us more information about ourselves. We can explore the new kind of plants and animals to benefit ourselves. The gene clone and the transgenic food are all the examples of this technology.

Admittedly, to protect the remote area have a lot of benefit. Yet, we should never put to much emphasize on it and neglect the environment that we are living in. Nevertheless, it is the environment that we are living that is the most important for us. The most parts of money that the government had should be put into the protection of the present environment instead of the remote area. We must admit that the present environment is the place that we are living in and thus, is closely connected with ourselves.

In summary, we should protect the publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people. But we should also pay attention to the environment that we are living in, for it is these area that is relevant to our present lives.

shj80929UID: 198047

Argument177  第2篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：28分55秒     754 words
从2005年8月8日21时41分到2005年8月8日22时28分
------题目------
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
'Membership in Oak City's Civic Club—a club whose primary objective is to discuss local issues—should continue to be restricted to people who live in Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot truly understand the business and politics of the city. It is important to restrict membership to city residents because only residents pay city taxes and therefore only residents understand how the money could best be used to improve the city. At any rate, restricting membership in this way is unlikely to disappoint many of the nonresidents employed in Oak City, since neighboring Elm City's Civic Club has always had an open membership policy, and only twenty-five nonresidents have joined Elm City's Club in the last ten years.'
------正文------
The editorial believes that they should restrict the membership to the local people. The author posits his point on the following ground. (1) the primary objective of the club is to discuss the local issues. (2) Only the local people will understand the business and politics of the city and the people who work in Oak City but live elsewhere will never know anything about the city. (3) Only the residents pay city taxes and therefore only residents understand how the money could best be used to improve the city. (4) The restriction will not disappoint many of the nonresidents employed in Oak City. (5) Only twenty-five nonresidents have joined Elm City's Club after they had employed the open membership policy. At the first glance, the author's point seems reasonable and sound, but after a careful scrutiny, we can find that there are a myriad of flaws and mistakes which render the position ungrounded and unsubstantiated.

First and foremost, the author assumes that only the local people understand the local matters and the people who work in the city but live in other places will know nothing about the city. This is a false deduction and has no ground. It is highly possible that it is the people who work here that know most about the city and the resident will never know anything about it if they do not work here. The person who work here are most likely to concern about the policy and the condition of the city for this is the place that they are working and getting money.

Furthermore, the author assumes that the club only concern about the local issues. This is also another flaw. It is highly possible that the local citizen had known a lot of things about the city and thus, they will likely to know something about the outsider; if this is the case, the author's point will never hold the water.

In addition, the author thinks that it is the local people who paid the money for the local place and thus, they are the person who will know how to use the money. But I can hardly agree with the author about this matter. The question of how to use the money is a matter of management and only the person who had learned something about economy and management will know how to deal with it. Thus, the local people will never know how to use these taxes, just because they are living here.

By the way, the author also holds that the restriction of membership will not impede the enthusiastic of the nonresidents employed in Oak City. I can never agree with it. The city is the place that these people worked and they are also closely connected with the city. If they can never take part in the discussion of how to build and improve the city, they will feel that they are not a part of the city; this will impede their passion to the city and therefore will hinder their working passion.

Last but not least, the author posits his contentions on the false analogy of the condition of the Elm City's Club and the Oak City's Club. It is highly possible that the conditions of the two cities are not the same and therefore what is true in the Elm City's Club will not necessarily true in the Oak City's Club. Furthermore, the author mentions that only twenty-five nonresidents have joined the Elm City's Club after they open the membership. The author believes that this is a small potion. But with on information about the city's size, it is highly possible that this is a large part of the people in the club. If this is the case, the author's contention can never hold water.

In summary, the author based his sentiments on several ungrounded and unreasonable deduction and therefore, is not valid. To make the conclusion more convincible, the author must prove that only the local citizens are concerned about the city's matters and the nonresidents employed in Oak City do not concern about it. The author also must prove that the club is only interested in the local matters. The author also must prove that the situations in the two cities are the same or at least comparable. The author also must prove the validity of the information and the material about the Elm City's Club is true. Before the author can do the above things, I can never agree with what the author had said.

shj80929UID: 198047

谢谢鼓励

shj80929UID: 198047

坚持呀，一定要坚持，无论发生什么事情，我一定要坚持下去，快要到达希望的彼岸了，不要让任何事情影响你的心情，一定要坚持。一定要相信自己，一定一定要坚持下去。希望不远了，一定要相信自己。不论发生什么事情一定要走自己的路，任何人或事都不可以影响你。你一定要相信自己！

shj80929UID: 198047

一定要主宰自己的命运。

shj80929UID: 198047

今天心情巨糟，实在是写不出来了。I am dying.

ladzhUID: 2105328

象你说的，一定要坚持！我是16号考，可是准备得感觉也不太充分。请你一定要坚持！相信自己，你一定会是最后的胜利者！

shj80929UID: 198047

谢谢你，我们都要坚持，一定要继续，你也一定要坚持，我们一定可以的，你一定要坚持！！！我有一种找到知音的感觉，我们都要坚持下去，一定， 一定！就是为了老爸老妈也一定要坚持下去！