issue38 高频，书和电视那篇

Esther.LiUID: 191003

------题目------
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
------正文------
Just as the speaker says, with both video and sound, television is showing us a more wonderful world day by day, which changes many people's life styles to some extent. However, in my point of view, reading books has at least as much impact on people as TV does, if not more than.

Admittedly, comparing with reading, watching TV might be more relaxing and less time-consuming, which is pretty adapted to the busy lives of modern citizens. But it is lack of more crucial merits as books have.

Firstly, books tell us about the long history instead of television. As a machine invented just over a hundred years ago, TV plays programs made relatively recently. Obviously, most of the human's thousands of years' history is blank in television, while a large myriad of historic events are documented and kept in books, in which splendid human culture and witness is preserved, such as Shakespeare's classic workings, Beethoven’s compositions, the Bible and so forth. If someone claims that TV nowadays is also able to show these, I will have to point out that the TV programs are depended on the books to a large extent, and change the composer's initial thinking more or less. As a result, books is one of the most significant method to know history and human culture.

Secondly, being restrained by conditions and resources under the nose, a majority of the world's information relies on books and newspapers to spread, although they are rather slower than television, radio and so on. After all, they are the best-spread style, and the one most convenient to keep. Good books and useful ones need to be read many times and badly needed in the market. For example, the famous magazine named Reader Digest sells pretty good with a huge publish quantity, and the Webster Dictionary has been edited for the 11th time not long before. So I conclude people's need in reading books is not likely to be replaced by TV, and people can certainly learn things they like and need, which does not exist in TV programs.

Thirdly, TV shows more about the phenomena, which is absolutely objective; while books explain the reasons and principles, which is somewhat subjective. It is undoubted that phenomena are simple to be observed, while the internal relevance is not so easily found. TV's expressing is far from enough, and books' supplement is badly needed. Especially by different writer's various opinions, the truth is more and more clear, and the culture will be better developed. During this process, readers' thinking is also practiced, which is meaningful for the whole lives.

Taking every aspect into account, along with the development of the society, TV might play a more and more significant rule, especially in entertainment and the expression of information. However, television can never take the place of books, for books tells people more useful knowledge and can be better kept, besides, books express varieties of thinking that come from many a people, which causes a further analysis about the truth and leads to the culture's advancement.

( 511 words, 44’50”)

特别希望得到思路、逻辑、结构和举例方面的建设性意见:)
谢谢:handshake

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-8-24 at 00:06 ]

TheoUID: 2108316

In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. (speaker的观点是人们可以从电视里学到和从书里一样多)
Just as the speaker says, with both video and sound, television is showing us a more wonderful world day by day, which changes many people's life styles to some extent. However, in my point of view, reading books has at least as much impact on people as TV does, if not more than. (作者的观点是书有和电视一样的影响力，这个观点和speaker的观点好像不在讲一件事)
Firstly, books tell us about the long history instead of television.(这句话意思肯定有问题，instead of television是什么意思啊？) As a machine invented just over a hundred years ago, TV plays programs made relatively recently. Obviously, most of the human's thousands of years' history is blank in television, while a large myriad of historic events are documented and kept in books, in which splendid human culture and witness is preserved, such as Shakespeare's classic workings, Beethoven’s compositions, the Bible and so forth. If someone claims that TV nowadays is also able to show these, I will have to point out that the TV programs are depended on （语法错误）the books to a large extent, and change the composer's initial thinking more or less.（为什么呢？太武断了吧） As a result, books is one of the most significant method to know history and human culture.（这个分论点个人认为站不住脚，有很多历史剧都很真实的反映了当时的历史）
Secondly, being restrained by conditions and resources under the nose, a majority of the world's information relies on books and newspapers to spread, although they are rather slower than television, radio and so on. After all, they are the best-spread style, and the one most convenient to keep. （为什么书是主要的信息传播媒介呢？）Good books and useful ones need to be read many times and badly needed in the market. （这句话没有支持分论点）For example, the famous magazine named Reader Digest sells pretty good with a huge publish quantity, and the Webster Dictionary has been edited for the 11th time not long before.（这两个例子不知道支持了作者的什么观点） So I conclude people's need in reading books is not likely to be replaced by TV, and people can certainly learn things they like and need, which does not exist in TV programs.

Thirdly, TV shows more about the phenomena, which is absolutely objective; while books explain the reasons and principles, which is somewhat subjective.（电视的评论也是主观的啊？） It is undoubted（no doubt) that phenomena are simple to be observed, while the internal relevance is not so easily found. TV's expressing is far from enough, and books' supplement is badly needed. (不知道为什么）Especially by different writer's various opinions, the truth is more and more clear, and the culture will be better developed. During this process, readers' thinking is also practiced, which is meaningful for the whole lives.


Taking every aspect into account, along with the development of the society, TV might play a more and more significant rule, especially in entertainment and the expression of information. However, television can never take the place of books, for books tells people more useful knowledge and can be better kept, besides, books express varieties of thinking that come from many a people, which causes a further analysis about the truth and leads to the culture's advancement.

TheoUID: 2108316

个人认为：
观点和speaker的没有很明显的联系
论证部分也没有能有效得证明作者的观点。不要生气啊拍得有点厉害，呵呵

我想这样写:
观点：承认人们可以从电视中学习到很多东西，但是电视无法给予人们那些书籍可以给予的。

分论点：

1。限于技术， 电视无法表现出书中所表现的宏伟场面，因为读书的时候，想象力起了很大的帮助，比如：harry potter, the lord of ring...
2。电视无法提供书籍中的语言美感。比如阅读沙翁的名著等等。。。
3。阅读时可以提供一种满足感和快感，这一点是个人经历，对一些人来说

可以让步一下，最后。呵呵
讨论以下哈

Esther.LiUID: 191003

In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. (speaker的观点是人们可以从电视里学到和从书里一样多)这个。。。看错了，大汗！！
Just as the speaker says, with both video and sound, television is showing us a more wonderful world day by day, which changes many people's life styles to some extent. However, in my point of view, reading books has at least as much impact on people as TV does, if not more than. (作者的观点是书有和电视一样的影响力，这个观点和speaker的观点好像不在讲一件事)同上大汗
Firstly, books tell us about the long history instead of television.(这句话意思肯定有问题，instead of television是什么意思啊？)我本来想表达rather than  As a machine invented just over a hundred years ago, TV plays programs made relatively recently. Obviously, most of the human's thousands of years' history is blank in television, while a large myriad of historic events are documented and kept in books, in which splendid human culture and witness is preserved, such as Shakespeare's classic workings, Beethoven’s compositions, the Bible and so forth. If someone claims that TV nowadays is also able to show these, I will have to point out that the TV programs are based on the books to a large extent, and change the composer's initial thinking more or less.（为什么呢？太武断了吧嗯，添加一个Shakespeare's classic writings被改编成电影电视的例子As a result, books is one of the most significant method to know history and human culture.（这个分论点个人认为站不住脚，有很多历史剧都很真实的反映了当时的历史）这个就是我上边“have to point out”的，已经回答完这个说法了

Secondly, being restrained by conditions and resources under the nose, a majority of the world's information relies on books and newspapers to spread, although they are rather slower than television, radio and so on. After all, they are the best-spread style, and the one most convenient to keep. （为什么书是主要的信息传播媒介呢？）没有说最主要，而是说传播最广泛的。比如一些偏远落后的地方没有电视，可是还是有书。Good books and useful ones need to be read many times and badly needed in the market. （这句话没有支持分论点）我用它来领起下文的 For example, the famous magazine named Reader Digest sells pretty good with a huge publish quantity, and the Webster Dictionary has been edited for the 11th time not long before.（这两个例子不知道支持了作者的什么观点）支持了前边那个说领起下文的句子。我本来是想列举书比电视的优越性，电视不能做到而书能做到的优点，以及书badly needed So I conclude people's need in reading books is not likely to be replaced by TV, and people can certainly learn things they like and need, which does not exist in TV programs.

Thirdly, TV shows more about the phenomena, which is absolutely objective; while books explain the reasons and principles, which is somewhat subjective.（电视的评论也是主观的啊？）我的意思是在说photos&sound,the record of the phenomena It is undoubted that phenomena are simple to be observed, while the internal relevance is not so easily found. TV's expressing is far from enough, and books' supplement is badly needed. (不知道为什么）这句我是承前启后的，原因在前边。Especially by different writer's various opinions, the truth is more and more clear, and the culture will be better developed. During this process, readers' thinking is also practiced, which is meaningful for the whole lives.


Taking every aspect into account, along with the development of the society, TV might play a more and more significant rule, especially in entertainment and the expression of information. However, television can never take the place of books, for books tells people more useful knowledge and can be better kept, besides, books express varieties of thinking that come from many a people, which causes a further analysis about the truth and leads to the culture's advancement.

:(

Esther.LiUID: 191003

非常感谢啊！！
拍得酣畅淋漓啊！呵呵，问题都指出的很中肯:D，尤其是3楼的建议^ ^

不过我不太明白一点：如果按照你的论点，就是同意了是么？因为不管后边的“但是”怎么样，它不能说明书给人的比电视多或者少。还是不同意？我不太明白你的立场啊？:p