- 最后登录
- 2010-6-5
- 在线时间
- 1 小时
- 寄托币
- 882
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-1
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 828
- UID
- 207694

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 882
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
In this argument, the arguer concludes that just for the sake of the instructor’s international reputation, the University of Claria are generally considered one of the best universities in the world. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer points out that several faculty members are internationally renowned as leaders. In addition, the arguer cites that 75 percent students of the university are able to find employment after graduation. On the basis of these evidence the author deduce that anyone seeking for a quality education should choose the University of Claria. This argument is logically flawed in several critical respects.
To begin with, the argument simply asserts that the University of Claria is one of the greatest university in the world just in that this University owns a wide instructors’ reputation. To be honest, it is true the level and prestige of the faculty play a significant role under construction of a university. However, not only does a famous university need a team of best teachers, but other aspects are also have amazing influences on the university. Such alternatives may include the quality and quantities of the university’s students, or that the surroundings of the school also have an amazing significant influence on the evaluation of the college. Consider that if the students entered the school with a very low education background or even wore, they are never intend to improvement themselves, no matter how excellent the teachers are, the university may be still far from a best school of the world. In addition, if lacking of the library containing abandon scientific books and other areas literatures or computer centers that connect the whole world, it is obvious that the university lost many important factors consisting of a outstanding university. It appears reasonable, therefore, for people to consider more sides of judging what a best university is.
Even if several faculty members of the University of Claria are internationally renowned as leaders, the argument rooted on the further assumption that two subjects of the university may have a high research level represents that the all the scientific studies of the school are the head of the world. But there is no any powerful evidence which can prove the relevant between the research leader abilities of English teachers and other subjects’ professors. Perhaps except these several excellent instructors, the rest teachers of the university are below the average level of the whole nation. As a result, there is no denying that just based on two or three famous professors could not display how distinguished the university is.
Finally, the percentage of students who find a job cannot completely attests that the University of Claria is able to educate the best students so that this school is one of the top universities in the world. It mentioned in the argument that 75 percent students can find am employment but the author dost not point out what kind of jobs the students get. If these graduated students just gain some jobs that all other universities’ student could find or ever worse, how could the University of Claria prove that the quality of its education? And the conclusion that the university belonging to the most greatest school in the world cannot be deduced.
Overall, the reasoning behind putting the University of Claria to the first-class university in the world seems logical as presented above since it has a worldwide instructors’ reputation. However, before any final decisions are made about anyone who seeking a quality education should choose this university, people should evaluate all factors of what a best university should have as compared to the University of Claria.
初练argument,602字,请多多指教!谢谢!~~ |
|