issue5

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

大家多多帮助啊！
请多多批评指教
issue5
title: A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."

As the competition between students who will enter college or university becomes more and more intense, "whether the nation should set a policy to make all the students receive the same courses?" grows to a hot title. We all know what courses have the students receive in their high schools directly affect the knowledge they mastered. But a college or a university only set the same question to test the individuals who want to enter it. I think that is unfair, so I consider a nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Admittedly, schools in different parts of the nation offer different academic courses have their own reasons. Like my school, "Laboring", a special course is set because my school lay down in a country where most of the people labor every day. In "Laboring " class, we are taught a lot of skills to make labor easier and better. We get a lot of nice means to labor, but we don't have enough time to prepare the courses which help us prepare the test for entrance. Besides, each school has its own curriculum, undoubtly, brings some convenience to it. For example, schools in cities often have more courses than that in towns. In cities, it's very common to have class at the evening since the tranportation there is convenient enough. While that is impossible to students in towns, to make sure the safety of everyone, the school almost close before sunset.  

However, most of the students want to enter the college or university that they are dream of, from my view, offering the same condition is the least thing to make fair on them. College or university only set one standard to evaluate all the competitors, no matter where they are from and what courses have they received. It will be unfair to some good students who haven't received the courses relevant to the test. Possibly, they will good enough to enter the college or university, if they are offered the same courses. Based on that, to offer the same corriculum and try our best to set the same conditions to them is necessary to insure fairness. If the competitors were in the same condition, it would also bring convenience to the professors to find good students.

Set the same national curriculum can also bring benefits to educators and education. The same national curriculum will make education more systermatic. More and more educators will worked on the same education system, and solve the problems it exists together. As the saying goes: 人多力量大. I believe more educators apply themselves to the same currilum, it will defenitely come out good result, then bring more benefit to education. Futhermore, the education system will become more and more consummate.

Balance the disadvantage and advantage, we can easily seen that setting a national curricum will bring more benefit than allowing schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. Since it is the basic insurrance of keeping fair to all the students, it also will supply every students fundamental knowledge and make the education system more consummate.