Issue83 Kito小组作业帖 多谢修改^-^

bunnymz2005UID: 2146758

【题目】
Issue83政治类（2005年2-9月总频47次）
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
************************************************************************************
【翻译】  
政府应该保护国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区，即使这些地区往往人迹罕至。
************************************************************************************
【提纲】
观点：同意。政府应该尽力保护国家领土中总公共拥有的荒凉地区，并且这是不以这些地区的远近为转移的。
1．从环境的角度，荒地的保存有助于保持一个地区，一个国家乃至世界的生态平衡, 这样人类的生存才能有保障。比如，the rainforest of Amazon.
2．从学术的角度，荒地，虽然人际罕至，但是往往生存着各种各样的物种，其中许多可能是独一无二的。对于学术研究来说，物种消失是莫大的损失，消失了一些优秀的基因之类的。
3．从经济的角度，诚然对于政府的财政是一种负担，但是它的潜在价值是不可忽视的。比如，美国犹他州的一块荒地，由克林顿划定，就富藏各种经济资源，如煤。
附：例子的资料A national monument in southern Utah
1996, United States President Bill Clinton proclaimed a 680,000-hectare (1.7 million-acre) expanse of red rock wilderness in southern Utah a national monument. The declaration of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument drew cheers from environmentalists and wrath from local politicians. It is rich in economic resources, particularly coal.
************************************************************************************
【正文】
Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural?  The author claims so. I am inclined to concur with the idea that it is government's responsible to preserve wilderness areas in good conditions no matter what role these areas play in the quotidian life of the residents. To further shore up my opinion, I would present my analysis in detail as below.

To begin with, concerning the immediate effect on environment, we know, as a general rule, that a wilderness area usually plays a vital role in maintaining balance for human, flora and fauna in nature. Without this balance, not only are the animals and the plants living in the wilderness areas injured badly but people, even residing far away from the wilderness areas, would also face a severe ecological disaster. Take the deforestation of Amazon for instance, the rainforest along Amazon River in which almost nobody is living tend to sharply decrease with time passed by. As a result, people, who are aware of this problem, would obviously feel that the global atmosphere aggravate gradually in accordance with the deterioration of the rainforest in the region of Amazon. Consequently, government should take up the responsibility to protect publicly owned wilderness areas as possible as it could in order to ensure the environment upon which people and other lives on the earth rely to survive.

In addition, when it turns out to academic field, the wilderness areas, though only accessible to only a few people, greatly appeal to people who are engaged in research work which may badly needs these untouched and thus primitive wilderness areas. For example, with the development of gene technology, people can now replicate, transfer and even integrate genes into new but a better one, all of which, however, hinge on the premise that there exist the genes and the genes which are worthy of being improved. Since the wilderness areas often are habitats of various species, the decision to pay less or no attention to these areas is absolutely not a wise one to the extent that it runs the risk of abandoning excellent genes in the world by doing which people would certainly expected nothing but a great loss in not simply the research but also the evolvement of human.

Last but not least, the publicly owned wilderness areas, evaluated in the consideration of their economical values, seems to be of little value in the people's eyes who tend to oppose the author's view. Nonetheless, the point is that people should also take into account the resource buried in the wilderness areas. A national monument in Utah, for example, which was proclaimed as a wilderness area by President Bill Clinton in 1996 illustrates this point. This national monument is rich in many economical resources, particular coal which all serve as indispensable energy in the development of modern society. Without enough energy provided, the world is presumed to be stalled in that all the machines can not work any more, which would absolutely bring great loss in the economy. On the contrary, with the wilderness areas protected carefully by government, the resource in them would be used when facing global shortage of energy.

To sum up, as discussed above, we can confidently draw a conclusion that the wilderness areas deserve the protection of government due to the interests they brings not only in the environment field but also in the academic and economical realms.

yogurt4UID: 198389

mm你真猛啊,大年三十还来贴作文
感动!!

bunnymz2005UID: 2146758

呵呵 其实也没那么强啦~~~
:$酸奶姐姐也挂在网上哦，过年好呀，祝你一切都好~~~~

jingjingtousUID: 2164820

刚刚看了你的文章，觉得写的。。。用你们女生的话说就是:好好哟，^_^
你是从publicly owned wilderness areas 对environment, academic, economic
三个方面来阐述你的观点的，非常棒，你的语言功底真好，除了在长句上很棒，你的承接转换更是让我佩服，每次看你的文章都有很大启发

leedgenUID: 160823

【提纲】
观点：同意。政府应该尽力保护国家领土中总公共拥有的荒凉地区，并且这是不以这些地区的远近为转移的。
1．从环境的角度，荒地的保存有助于保持一个地区，一个国家乃至世界的生态平衡, 这样人类的生存才能有保障。比如，the rainforest of Amazon.
2．从学术的角度，荒地，虽然人际罕至，但是往往生存着各种各样的物种，其中许多可能是独一无二的。对于学术研究来说，物种消失是莫大的损失，消失了一些优秀的基因之类的。
3．从经济的角度，诚然对于政府的财政是一种负担，但是它的潜在价值是不可忽视的。比如，美国犹他州的一块荒地，由克林顿划定，就富藏各种经济资源，如煤。
附：例子的资料A national monument in southern Utah
1996, United States President Bill Clinton proclaimed a 680,000-hectare (1.7 million-acre) expanse of red rock wilderness in southern Utah a national monument. The declaration of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument drew cheers from environmentalists and wrath from local politicians. It is rich in economic resources, particularly coal.
*****************************************************************
从三个角度来分析为什么政府要保护那些荒凉地区，非常好的思路
但是有一点，在经济角度来看，保护那些荒凉地区会增加政府财政的负担吗？
【正文】
Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural?  The author claims so. I am inclined to concur with the idea that it is government's responsible（responsibility） to preserve wilderness areas in good conditions no matter what role these areas play in the quotidian life of the residents. To further shore up（这个shore up原来是支持的意思，学习下） my opinion, I would present my analysis in detail as below.

To begin with, concerning the immediate effect on environment, we know, as a general rule, that a wilderness area usually plays a vital role in maintaining balance for human, flora and fauna in nature. Without this balance, not only are the animals and the plants living in the wilderness areas injured badly but people, even residing far away from the wilderness areas, would also face a severe ecological disaster. Take the deforestation of Amazon for instance, the rainforest along Amazon River in which almost nobody is living tend to sharply decrease with time passed by. As a result, people, who are aware of this problem, would obviously feel that the global atmosphere aggravate gradually in accordance with the deterioration of the rainforest in the region of Amazon. Consequently, government should take up the responsibility to protect publicly owned wilderness areas as possible as it could in order to ensure the environment upon which people and other lives on the earth rely to survive.写的真好，每句话前后衔接很紧密，例子也得到了充分分析

In addition, when it turns out to academic field, the wilderness areas, though only accessible to only a few people, greatly appeal to people who are engaged in research work which may badly needs these untouched and thus primitive wilderness areas. For example, with the development of gene technology, people can now replicate, transfer and even integrate genes into new but a better one, all of which, however, hinge on the premise that there exist the genes and the genes（这里and the genes是不是多余的？） which are worthy of being improved. Since the wilderness areas often are habitats of various species, the decision to pay less or no attention to these areas is absolutely not a wise one to the extent that it runs the risk of abandoning excellent genes in the world by doing which people would certainly expected nothing but a great loss in not simply the research but also the evolvement of human. 我觉得这里还要再说明一下那些基因到底对人类有什么好处呢，只讲了一点点好像还不够说服我哟，花花:)

Last but not least, the publicly owned wilderness areas, evaluated in the consideration of their economical values, seems to be of little value in the people's eyes who tend to oppose the author's view. Nonetheless, the point is that people should also take into account the resource buried in the wilderness areas. A national monument in Utah, for example, which was proclaimed as a wilderness area by President Bill Clinton in 1996 illustrates this point. This national monument is rich in many economical resources, particular coal which all serve as indispensable energy in the development of modern society. Without enough energy provided, the world is presumed to be stalled in that all the machines can not work any more, which would absolutely bring great loss in the economy. On the contrary, with the wilderness areas protected carefully by government, the resource in them would be used when facing global shortage of energy.最后这个我有点晕，看最后几句是说这些荒凉地区的矿产资源等是保护起来给后人用，是这么理解吗？

To sum up, as discussed above, we can confidently draw a conclusion that the wilderness areas deserve the protection of government due to the interests they brings not only in the environment field but also in the academic and economical realms.结尾简洁但是全面，好

写得真好，羡慕啊
以后我要一直来拜读小花的作文了，能学到太多东西了