issue10 写得很迷茫，不知道跑题没，请大家帮忙看看，谢谢！回拍请留下链接

Archer1123UID: 206148

Issue10.”Government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because it is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and generated.”
不同意：政府资助大城市主要是为了促进其经济繁荣发展，而不是特意为了保护发展传统文化。仅从保护发展传统文化的角度上，对乡村的资助更有效。
1.        从发展经济、提高国际影响力的角度，政府对大城市必要的财政资助是合理有效的。
2.        从保护发展传统文化的角度，乡村更应该得到政府资助。
结论：政府应该平衡对大城市和乡村的资助，在经济发展的同时也保护发扬了传统文化。
Nowadays, it is trendy that governments afford sufficient financial support to major cities, which redounds to prospering economic development but benefits a little to nation’s cultural tradition. What is more effective is that government should sponsor countryside or rural areas for the purpose of preserving and generating conventionally cultural trait.   

It is a reasonable and effective way that government provides adequate economic support to major cities, especially in developing period when the nation has not enough power to cover everywhere. Common sense tells us that one or several metropolises always serve as the representation of its nation. When we mention New York, America will occur to most people; and when we refer to Beijing, it is natural that people associate it with China; and when we talk about Pairs, it will bring to remembrance of France. The investment in such cities would bring about more returns and benefits than other cities or countryside, since these cities have developed better than other areas comparatively, such as completed public facilities, convenient traffics and transportations, as well various topping professional people, while countryside has only a few. Based on their existing advantages, the economic support from government will accelerate the development of major cities quickly. What is more significant is that these cities could feed back more rapidly than other regions too. The metropolises are more attractive than rural areas to international and national companies, the multifold investors and the like, which conduce to promoting cities. It forms a good circle gradually. That is to say, the same investment to major cities could contribute more greatly and obviously than that to countryside when it comes to economic advancement.   

Every coin has two coins. The merits of metropolises in economic development become demerits in persevering nation’s cultural tradition. In fact, it is the rural regions that maintain the original cultural traits; simultaneously the government funds are necessary in order to preserve traditions. Just because the major cities have attracted divers companies and people from different places, and in turn these cities transform convergences of various culture step by step, while the original cultural traditions of these cities changed or even disappeared under the exotic cultural influence and shock. On the contrary, the rural regions suffer little from the interaction or interplay and they could keep pristine and pure cultural traditions more easily than metropolises. Nevertheless, the underdeveloped economic conditions in countryside make most cultural heritages away from the wealth; and the worse situation is that some heritors have difficult in bearing livelihood merely via their traditional handcraft. For the sake of the bread-and-butter or living a better life, numerous young people are unwilling or reject to heritage cultural tradition and prefer to earn living in cities as common people. As a result, some cultural heritages which had handed down from one generation to another generation are lost for lack of heritors. Only when governments appropriate funds to solve such difficulties and provide sufficient support to heritors of cultural heritors, could the situation be turn-around. Generally speaking, the countryside and rural regions are the proper place where governments should afford financial support for persevering nation’s cultural traditions.

The metropolises and countryside have distinct characters; therefore government should make full use of both. It is vital for any nation to strike a balance between developing economy and persevering cultural traditions. So does the financial support.

[ 本帖最后由 Archer1123 于 2006-2-18 08:26 编辑 ]

TARZAN_1982UID: 2142821

Issue10.”Government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because it is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and generated.”
不同意：政府资助大城市主要是为了促进其经济繁荣发展，而不是特意为了保护发展传统文化。仅从保护发展传统文化的角度上，对乡村的资助更有效。
1.        从发展经济、提高国际影响力的角度，政府对大城市必要的财政资助是合理有效的。
2.        从保护发展传统文化的角度，乡村更应该得到政府资助。
结论：政府应该平衡对大城市和乡村的资助，在经济发展的同时也保护发扬了传统文化。

我对这个issue仔细考虑了一下，如果单从对题目的理解来看，注意because后面是一个强调句，强调的是primarily in cities，似乎从这个角度谈对于文化传统的保护和产生比较直接，但是按照issue官方的写作要求是可以从任何角度考虑的，只要你能够充分的支持它，所以应该说你的提纲还是不错的，为保险起见，你还是和别人再确认一下，然后最好也告诉我一声，老实说我对这个题目也很头疼

Nowadays, it is trendy that governments afford sufficient financial support to major cities, which redounds to 不错，不错！ prospering economic development but benefits a little to nation’s cultural tradition. What is more effective is that government should sponsor countryside or rural areas for the purpose of preserving and generating conventionally cultural trait.   

It is a reasonable and effective way that government provides adequate economic support to major cities, especially in developing period when the nation has not enough power to cover everywhere. Common sense tells us that one or several metropolises always serve as the representation of its nation. When we mention New York, America will occur to most people; and when we refer to Beijing, it is natural that people associate it with China; and when we talk about Pairs, it will bring to remembrance of France. 排比，很考察英语水平啊，不错，不过对于前面的occur to我不知道是不是用的准确 The investment in such cities would bring about more returns and benefits than other cities or countryside, since these cities have developed better than other areas comparatively, such as completed public facilities, convenient traffics and transportations, as well various topping professional people, while countryside has only a few. Based on their existing advantages, the economic support from government will accelerate the development of major cities quickly是否和前面的加速一次重复，请斟酌. What is more significant is that these cities could feed back more rapidly than other regions too. The metropolises are more attractive than rural areas to international and national companies, the multifold investors and the like, which conduce to promoting cities. It forms a good circle gradually. That is to say, the same investment to major cities could contribute more greatly and obviously than that to countryside when it comes to economic advancement.   

Every coin has two coins.是不是sides啊，能帮我确认一下么The merits of metropolises in economic development become demerits in persevering nation’s cultural tradition. In fact, it is the rural regions that maintain the original cultural traits; simultaneously 连词是否应该用一个转折关系的呢the government funds are necessary in order to preserve traditions. 读前一句感觉应该用个转折连词，但是后面又有because，总之感觉不是很顺畅，再平衡一下吧Just because the major cities have attracted divers companies and people from different places, and in turn these cities transform convergences of various culture step by step, while the original cultural traditions of these cities changed or even disappeared under the exotic cultural influence and shock. On the contrary, the rural regions suffer little from the interaction or interplay and they could keep pristine and pure cultural traditions more easily than metropolises. Nevertheless, the underdeveloped economic conditions in countryside make most cultural heritages away from the wealth; and the worse situation is that some heritors have difficult in bearing livelihood merely via their traditional handcraft. For the sake of the bread-and-butter 这是一个形容词，如果意在修饰后面的life好像也不合适or living a better life, numerous young people are unwilling or reject to heritage cultural tradition and prefer to earn living in cities as common people?. As a result, some cultural heritages which had handed down from one generation to another generation are lost for lack of heritors. Only when governments appropriate funds to solve such difficulties and provide sufficient support to heritors of cultural heritors, could the situation be turn-around. Generally speaking, the countryside and rural regions are the proper place where governments should afford financial support for persevering nation’s cultural traditions.

To sum up，The metropolises and countryside have distinct characters; therefore government should make full use of both. It is vital for any nation to strike a balance between developing economy and persevering cultural traditions. So does the financial support.

总的来说还是不错的，至少要比我写的好很多，尤其那个排比很出彩，不过我感觉重点应该放在第三段，第二段似乎比重大了些。个人意见，仅供参考，我们可以多多交流，互相提高！

Archer1123UID: 206148

1. occur to 印象中可以这样用吧，通常是sth (idea, thought, method ) occur to sb, 表示某人想到了什么吧
2. 应该是every coin has two sides, 我写错了，呵呵
3. 我记错了，以为是名词，改为bread and butter
4. common people 原意是想说那种平民百姓，非文化传统的继承者，但是不知道该如何表达，有什么好建议没？
5. 其实我没有第三段，那已经是结尾了，呜呜……第二段我是想纠正题目中的第二句话，强调其实政府应该把重点放在扶持乡村，如果目的是保护文化遗产

TARZAN_1982UID: 2142821

哦，原来是这样！