issue52 Gter四月''无名''小组第27次作业-园有桃

yytmywhUID: 2188847

52. "Education encourages students to question and criticize, and therefore does little to promote social harmony."
教育鼓励学生们提出问题和进行批判，这样做的结果无助于促进社会的和谐。

The speaker asserts that social harmony could not be promoted by encouraging students to question and criticize. While I contend that criticizing too much can be harmful to any society, I disagree with the speaker otherwise. In fact, I would go further by contending that encouraging students to question is beneficial to society to some extent, and that society needs such questioning and criticizing.

As what comes first, I would begin with discussing that what real social harmony is. Social harmony is certain environment in which people lead peaceful lives without too much combat threatening people’s happy lives. It does not mean that people could not be encouraged to question and criticize, because certain forms of criticizing or questioning are good signs of harmony. Could you imagine a society in which people do not ask, at all, any questions to each others. That would be a society without any activities, and the development of society would not be rapid. Therefore, it would be reasonable to consider a social harmony as harmony in which there are proper questioning and criticizing and people think logically without any blind faith.

In addition, blind faith would be harmful to society as it makes people avoid thinking independently and logically. In field of polity, people who believe and follow their leader blindly would have no their own ideas, and there would be less debate on decisions made by government. The leader could not be always right, so some problems may come out from such blind faith of political leader in government. In field of art, questioning and criticizing promote people’s creativities, which accelerate the development of art. And education, as the most important component in a society, affecting the future of society, should encourage students to question more and criticize more to form a logical environment for the whole nation. Every nation develops itself by keeping questioning and criticizing prior theories and rules. For instance, in Italy Galilei made that famous experiment, which overset the old physical theory, and gave a brand new view of physical theory to the whole world. Hence, to question and criticize could not be considered as factors making disharmony in society.

Nevertheless, too much questioning and criticizing may cause some problems in society because sometimes people need a leader to make some huge decisions for the whole nation. It is good to express someone’s unsatisfying of decisions made by government, but if there is too much complaint or strike, social harmony would be destroyed. Dealing with too much doubt would cost government floods of time and money. Thus even questioning and criticizing are good and should be encouraged, they need to be limited by certain rule. And students should be educated to make their questioning and criticizing in proper ways.

In sum, I agree that overemphasizing questioning and criticizing would do harm to society. Understandably, either political leaders or managers in corporations need to be support and their ideas need to be followed by others—at least to some extent. However, education should never avoid encouragement of questioning and criticizing, which would not harm society if they are made in proper way and limited in proper boundaries.

[ 本帖最后由 yytmywh 于 2006-3-13 20:06 编辑 ]

suyueUID: 2181126

我胡说几句：
１．开头最好把提纲写出来，方便别人思考，也方便自己最后的总结．

The speaker asserts that social harmony could not be promoted by encouraging students to question and criticize. While I contend that criticizing too much can be harmful to any society, I disagree with the speaker otherwise. In fact, I would go further by contending that encouraging students to question is beneficial to society to some extent, and that society needs such questioning and criticizing.　着是你文章的Ｔ．Ｓ这个不能想怎么写就怎么写．你写下面的所有都是为了论证你的Ｔ．Ｓ．有些文章不好写的时候可以把Ｔ．Ｓ写的模糊一些．这样最少能避免跑题的大错误
As what comes first, I would begin with discussing that what real social harmony is. Social harmony is certain environment in which people lead peaceful lives without too much combat threatening people’s happy lives. It does not mean that people could not be encouraged to question and criticize, because certain forms of criticizing or questioning are good signs of harmony. 这句Ｔ．Ｓ个人理解问题比较大１．提出概念的时候最好不要写ＲＥＡＬ　ＴＵＲＥ　等太绝对的词，写是个人理解比较好要给自己留有余地２．提出概念是为了给段落Ｔ．Ｓ论证打个基础方便论证：比如说社会和谐你这个概念提出后是为了你着段话Ｔ．Ｓ的论证．这段话的Ｔ．Ｓ你没有真正的提出来却用后面的兰色文章Ｔ．Ｓ加以解释．着不等于说我认为它是圆的因为它是圆的Ｔ．Ｓ不能解释任何东西．因为这个是你的观点不能作为证据．３．着段话的Ｔ．Ｓ应该是批判和质疑有助于和谐社会的建立，然而你的概念解释没有达到它应有的作用．你的论证是没有质疑社会就没有活力和发展．那和谐社会的定义你就应该说和谐社会是有活力和发展的社会．这样才能用你证明过的概念来支持你的论证．４．概念解释，容易把人饶进去而且不能突出你的观点，建议少用，尤其在没有例子的情况下．Could you imagine a society in which people do not ask, at all, any questions to each others. That would be a society without any activities, and the development of society would not be rapid. Therefore, it would be reasonable to consider a social harmony as harmony in which there are proper questioning and criticizing and people think logically without any blind faith.

In addition, blind faith would be harmful to society as it makes people avoid thinking independently and logically. 加句话把段落Ｔ．Ｓ和文章Ｔ．Ｓ联系下，说社会需要独立和批判的思考，因为段落Ｔ．Ｓ和文章Ｔ．Ｓ有些距离了．In field of polity, people who believe and follow their leader blindly would have no their own ideas, and there would be less debate on decisions made by government. The leader could not be always right, so some problems may come out from such blind faith of political leader in government. In field of art, questioning and criticizing promote people’s creativities, which accelerate the development of art. And education, as the most important component in a society, affecting the future of society, should encourage students to question more and criticize more to form a logical environment for the whole nation. Every nation develops itself by keeping questioning and criticizing prior theories and rules. For instance, in Italy Galilei made that famous experiment, which overset the old physical theory, and gave a brand new view of physical theory to the whole world. Hence, to question and criticize could not be considered as factors making disharmony in society.

Nevertheless, too much questioning and criticizing may cause some problems in society because sometimes people need a leader to make some huge decisions for the whole nation. It is good to express someone’s unsatisfying of decisions made by government, but if there is too much complaint or strike, social harmony would be destroyed. Dealing with too much doubt would cost government floods of time and money.精彩句学习！ （后面最好支持下你的观点，没例子就加ＢＥＣＡＵＳＥ）Thus even questioning and criticizing are good and should be encouraged, they need to be limited by certain rule. And students should be educated to make their questioning and criticizing in proper ways.

In sum, I agree that overemphasizing questioning and criticizing would do harm to society. Understandably, either political leaders or managers in corporations need to be support and their ideas need to be followed by others—at least to some extent. However, education should never avoid encouragement of questioning and criticizing, which would not harm society if they are made in proper way and limited in proper boundaries.结尾不看了
总的说没有论证出你文章的Ｔ．Ｓ．主要因为你Ｔ．Ｓ写的绝对了，而且后面段落Ｔ．Ｓ也没有很好支持．句子不错，例子也好．　拍狠了别介意