fff

zarcUID: 199419

原帖由 beifeng 于 2006-7-16 02:05 发表
1。是很想发siggraph阿，但太浪费时间了，咱不在香港，还得作project，不是专门发paper的工具啊。那是等要做prof.是在考虑的东西，何况vision和graph还是不同的。
2。phd快2年了。

太好了，看了mit和cmu给你的回信，俺也有信心了。

其实以你现在的文章档次和数量，已经超过很多top5学校毕业的fresh phd了。

但是你申10个是不是有点多啊，我打算申5个，嗯。

zarcUID: 199419

原帖由 yemj97 于 2006-7-16 03:15 发表
你怎么不早申请阿,等你申请到估计都读完3年了,其实都可phd毕业了,不凡考虑postDoc如果你这么喜欢做研究.

可以在他原来的学校拿个master；
很多人有名校情节，phd和postdoc两码事。

xxxxxxxxxxUID: 210272

原帖由 beifeng 于 2006-7-17 02:30 发表
cvpr 06你去了没，我可能在那儿碰到过你，
你做的主要是哪个方面的？
申请fall07的有一个非常非常牛
科大eeis的毕业生，我是不能跟他相提并论的，
只能捡他的offer。

你参加了这么多会议，拿几片好文章套教授就是了:D:D~~

xxxxxxxxxxUID: 210272

原帖由 beifeng 于 2006-7-17 03:00 发表
top5的学校基本上是套不了的，
决定权不在prof.掌里，只能通过学校。

但是如果Prof想要你，估计系里也不会拦吧

zarcUID: 199419

原帖由 beifeng 于 2006-7-16 19:30 发表
cvpr 06你去了没，我可能在那儿碰到过你，
你做的主要是哪个方面的？
申请fall07的有一个非常非常牛
科大eeis的毕业生，我是不能跟他相提并论的，
只能捡他的offer。

in library, no chinese input, sorry.

My work focused on data mining and pattern recognition. I didn't submit to CVPR, but to ICPR,SIGKDD,ACM MM,CIKM and ICDM. I am preparing a paper to TKDE, or maybe TPAMI.

I just finished my first year PhD, hopefully i can obtain my MS next year and transfer to a good university :(.

'只能捡他的offer。' --the good news is, there are several good universities and he has to choose only one ;)

huangjin_suzhouUID: 37183

我的确不是CS的，但我看你有点文章，觉得还是５０为主，冲刺几个，毕竟申请还要看GPA，推荐信，人品呢。晕，鼓励你申请就代表你有戏啊，老美做事总是以鼓励为主的。既然你觉得自己牛，你愿意申请MIT，CMU就去啊，在这里发帖问什么，显摆啊。说实话，你要转学还要你现在学校的推荐信呢，如果老板不放，哪个学校敢要你，既然你这么牛，老板会放你？呵呵，大家本来都不是专家，发表一下看法，没什么胡说之类的。好了，好运吧。
还有，你说的话真给科大丢脸，比那个搞笑校长还自大。

原帖由 beifeng 于 2006-7-16 09:13 发表
嘿嘿，我是科大老人了，当然沾点老科大的色彩了，
嘴巴贱点，别以为同门就会有偏好，对就是对，错就是错，
但心底很好。

“一些反对性的意见”，我一直在听着，但那个“top 50 at most”
太搞了点，还是“ ...

gdhdannyUID: 125843

为什么不去mitbbs问？来gter大部分还没出来，转校“经验”恐怕难以让你满意。

另外huangjin_suzhou有一句话说得我比较认同，“大家本来都不是专家，发表一下看法，没什么胡说之类的。”你既然认定说你top 50是在瞎扯，说明对自己信心十足，还来这里问什么？

题外话，我身边也有几个学的不错的中科大出来的，远没有你这般傲气。几篇不算太水的paper而已，还是等你去了stanford再来这里谈点“经验”，远比现在这种扯淡让人受用的多。

zarcUID: 199419

原帖由 gdhdanny 于 2006-7-16 21:17 发表
为什么不去mitbbs问？来gter大部分还没出来，转校“经验”恐怕难以让你满意。

另外huangjin_suzhou有一句话说得我比较认同，“大家本来都不是专家，发表一下看法，没什么胡说之类的。”你既然认定说你top 50是 ...

there's few discussion concerning transfering in MITBBS. They prefer to job hunting much more :).

Anyways, he's gone. He may not share his experience here in GTER even he finally succeed in entering TOP 5. And that's a loss of GTER. :(

His words may be agressive, however his papers are indeed very high quality.

And actually, compared to references, GPA, english scores such these things, published papers are obviously far more important since they can clearly prove the applicant's research capability but not only the potential.

As a boss, I think you should balance beweeen different opinions, not get involved in a quarrel.

That's all I wanna say. :handshake

gdhdannyUID: 125843

原帖由 zarc 于 2006-7-17 07:32 发表


there's few discussion concerning transfering in MITBBS. They prefer to job hunting much more :).

Anyways, he's gone. He may not share his experience here in GTER even he finally succeed in  ...

Do you ever "understand" any ppl in a top 5 school? Do you ever think they would like to share any single minute in such kind of pointless discussions or what you called "quarrel"?

Did you ever seriously read through everything related in mitbbs? There are like over 6 pages of topic lists in their essence section, which indeed is quite helpful, if not more, for those who are already studying abroad and is getting confused about their future (transferring to another school, switching between academic advisors, etc.)

Academic relations here in the US is equally important just like everywhere else in the world. A program committee cares more about the last "attached" name --- the real boss of the paper rather than some rookies in the same area. I was not saying that appropriate aggressiveness is something dispicable, nor did I question that guy's academic potential or "capability". Please understand the difference between being "aggressive" and "assertive", the latter of which is a more common charactoristic that can be found in those real successful researchers and social figures in general.

GTER itself is no more than an information exchange platform for those who share their interests and short term objective to go abroad. It is quite a serious sense to say somebody's "gone" is a "loss" to the others. Granted there are some special cases where everyone else in the forum share the same feelings, it is more likely to be the feelings for somebody who actually did something, namely to help others, rather than someone to bring up his confidence by defaming all the other negative comments.

My words might be a little strong, and it's not because I am the "boss" (even though I used to be), but rather coming from a veteran here who actually cares about this forum. I feel sorry too that he had already deleted everything he posted, but that's not necessarily a bad thing considering the limited useful and inheritable information it provided.

Anyway, please chill out and I'm gonna shut the fuck up too. I didn't mean to bring up problems to anyone as long as everyone behave themselves.

genie05UID: 30358

楼主要攻击瀚海上的人,请去瀚海攻击.不要在GTER来说.

huangjin_suzhou  讨论申请问题请不要攻击到科大校长.谢谢.不管他对外说什么,作为科大校长,作为院士,我想他值得你的尊重.

谢谢DANNY那么多回复,不过既然这位USTCER已经删除了自己的申请背景和求教的问题,这个帖子我锁了.有问题联系我.

[ 本帖最后由 genie05 于 2006-7-17 14:53 编辑 ]