- 最后登录
- 2006-9-12
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 10
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-17
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 6
- UID
- 2118138

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 10
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-17
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2006-7-22 18:22:44
|显示全部楼层
剑四的,讲传播手段优劣的,欢迎高手指点:)
When it comes to the effective media, a great majority of people usually would think of television. However, apart from that, there are various media, such as books and radio. Here, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of those three media respectively.
Television is by all means an effective medium. On one hand, it can provide us information with motion picture and audible sound. On the other hand, it coverss a wide range of the information all over the world, varying from news, reports, to films and TV series. However, television has its side effects, especially to our health. For example, long time of watching TV is harmful not only to our eyes but also to our brains. The radiation given off by the television is likely to cause some disease as well.
In contrast, radio with no motive picture seems less effective than television although it could also supply the audible sound and varied information. Nevertheless, it has own edge, say, when you drive a car, the only information you can get is mostly from the radio.
Compared with the above two media, books are not so vivid and active, for the words in the books are stationary and usually with no sound. But the charm of words is enormous. Particularly when you read a novel, you can experience the feeling of the author through the accurate usage of word, whereas when you watch the TV, such experience may be twisted by the wrong act of the actor.
Further more, the cost of writing a book is much less than the cost of producing a TV program or radio program.
Consequently, television, radio and books all have their advantages and disadvantages. It’s really hard to tell which is better or which is worse. All of these three media have their great contribution to the spreading of information to human beings. So, none of them should we abandon at present and in the future. |
|