issue17 法律公正与否.... 欢迎来拍,必回拍哦!

AimiaUID: 2241800

Laws, body of official rules and regulations, are used to govern a society and control the behaviors of its members. In my observation, it is extremely presumptuous to assert that we have the right to obey just laws and disobey the unjust laws. As a social member, we are incumbent to not violate any laws, [从英语的习惯表达，按照你的意思，这句应该写成”我们没有责任去违背法律”，而不是”我们有责任不去违背法律”]at the same time; we might turn to appropriate means to repeal the unfavorable laws.

At the threshold matter, the line between just and unjust is difficult to draw, according to discrepant people's beliefs, interests, experiences. [这句不错噢]There is no exaggeration to say that just or unjust is an[a] subjective matter somehow, hence, different people might hold sheer dissimilar viewpoints toward one case. Then legislation, the sublime guidance for all the people who lives the society, how to define such an[a] subjective matter?  Needless to say, it is beyond mankind's imagination. Take the controversial issue "abortion", into account. Those who hold religious belief might have intensive contradiction with such laws flavored with the sanction of abortion, for the simple reason that lives has come into being from their religious perspective. Meanwhile, those people who deem merely infants possess lives have the justification to substantiate the right to abortion as a just law. As a result, people of different culture backgrounds have conflicts with each other due to the concept of "just" and "unjust". That is to say, we need not go further to bother the definition of just or unjust laws, for any single law can not so circumspect that it satisfies any member’s interest and propensity.//难以划定just or unjust

Furthermore, as social members, we have no sound reason to violate the laws, even those unjust law in lights of us. On one hand, laws lie in the core values on which a society depends to thrive. It is to serve to regulate people's behaviors and action, enforced by corresponding penalties, punishment and remedies, absent of which any laws would reveal it is [an] empty and ramshackle one. Then the coherent spirits of one society is under challenges. Former Soviet Union is a[an] extremely vivid examples[example]. Though the law of Soviet Union is acclaimed to guarantee freedom of speech, press, and assembly, in practice the Soviet government continually repressed those freedoms, And the leader of Soviet Union, Stalin, do not receive any penalties or called to account for his action.[这句有语法问题噢，时态以及主被动] In my view, granted leaders commit errors or mistakes, they are inevitably obey the country's laws, otherwise the trust and confidence of citizens in that countries would be paralyzed. On the other hand, even toward those unjust laws, we could not have the freedom to rampant[rampantly] violate them. If so, we provide ourselves [with] a reasonable assumption that we could violate any laws, for we could find a host of sound reason to substantiate any single laws. Consequently, what our well-ordered society might relegate is beyond our imagination. Juvenile delinquency might be increasingly manifest[这里应该是形容词吧] due to those poor children are deprived the best opportunities of education; tremendous corporations might experience the declining reputation crisis[decline 和crisis 取一个就可以了，不然意思就反了] owing to one [主语是复数]company’s fraudulent accounting. Those people, regarding those laws possess underlying unjust aspects for them, disobey crimes[disobey crimes??] and therefore, turmoil and chaos in our society might follow. //无论什么法律,都要遵守

When confronting with unjust laws, resorting to rational and legislative alternatives is the sensible choice. As I mention above, ruthless violation toward existing laws is regarded as unfair action. Fortunately, we have some other legal remedies to appeal such laws if there appears much of irrationality. For instance, Constitution has been amended for many times in that with ever-changing situation, a host of regulation or laws do not adapt to modern society. Consequently, we have such opportunities to presents our viewpoint toward some certain unfair laws. Now any democracy countries, say, American, Canada, have[has] such whole and complete constitutional system to amend those laws suffering some[from??] unfairness. That is to say, we have no better alternatives than seek such legal organization to repeal or amend such seemly not so friendly laws.//不好的法律要用其他合法手段去解决

To sum up, modern society is highly orderly, well-present largely due to the boundaries of laws. Whatever those laws are just or unjust in the light of one individual; he/she is incumbent to obey them without any other proviso. Otherwise, our society would bog down the trap we brought to ourselves.

写得很好噢，无论论证角度还是举例还是语言，注意一下小的语法细节就可以啦

AimiaUID: 2241800

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101

那就帮忙看下这篇吧
谢谢啦~~