issue48[shining sep]第六次作业

xuxinyunUID: 2198143

看连接~~~

[ 本帖最后由 xuxinyun 于 2006-8-21 13:24 编辑 ]

flycc28UID: 2164453

When we read history, it is easy to find that what we get are always some famous people who may be leaders of a war, a successful person in some area while we rarely read some stories about some other people who may be common ones. Dose it mean that the study of history places too much emphasis on individuals? I do not think so. On balance, I consider that it is necessary for historians to study famous individuals since their irreplaceable position while we also cannot forget other common people who may be make our history more specific and precise.

  On one hand, it is true that the history cannot be created only by someone own self这个表达不知对不对... 就individuals吧 In the past, the revolution of France, the civil war of United States, the win of the world two are all done by all the people. Nowadays, the birth of the first colony sheep Donny, the order of the DNA and many other advanced technologies are created by the effort of all human being. From this perspective, it is not reasonable to say that only one or two person created history.
  
  On the other hand, there always are leaders or centers of everything. Because of these leaders, such histories maybe have possibility to come true from dream. As leaders, these famous people are like flags. In politics, chairman Mao in China is the flag of the history of China became independentChairman Mao was the flag during China's strugle for independence; Lincoln is the one who represent the time when USA freed the salves; in literature, Hugo is the flag of the Romanticism period; in arts, S is the flag of …, Monnet is the representative of Impression s is represent . All these people are famous ones who are the power or the leader in their areas. When we think about these people, what we remind is that history. Similarly, when we think about that history, we may remind those leaders naturally.  Studying on these people, we can easily see the characteristic of that period because they represent that time. On contrary, if we just study some groups of common people, it is possible that they do not have the characteristic that time so that the study may be not correct because the common ones are not the leader who may the power of one historical affair. For example, when we study on some war, if we put our attention on a common solider, it is possible that he attended the war just because of the order. He may have his own effort----->contribution to the history , but he cannot represent the whole war.
  
  What is more, when we study history, we just can study by some files passing ----->document passed generation by generation. Most of these files only recorded the leaders or the famous people of one period history. It is unrealistic for historians to study every person. Of course, it dose not mean that the study can ignore the common people completely. If we just put our attention on individuals, our studies may be not comprehensive and specific enough.

   To conclude, it is very likely that people may never achieve the same idea one---->on the controversial issue. But taking all possibilities into account may be the first step. --第一句似乎跟主题没关系啊...Consequently, studying on individuals is able to help us know the whole trend and the main character of the history. Meanwhile, we must not ignore the common people to prevent our study from imprecise.


提纲写的很清楚,结构也很清楚,但是建议把每段的TS好好斟酌一下.写文章的时候也切忌完全中文式翻译提纲,一些句子可以再斟酌一下
时间内写完---赞~~