issue144 Myth小组第三次作业 airbots

airbotsUID: 2225434

提纲：
1＋艺术家给予社会传世作品
2＋即使有倾向的批评家对艺术家的作品进行了错误批评，最终还是不会被认可.
3- 批评家可以帮助艺术家宣传，解释作品，从而使得人们发现这些作品的内在价值。

I agree with the writer's assertion that it is the artist, not the critic, who give society something of lasting values. However, through the comments, critic can help people to know better about the artist's works, and lead them to dig deeper meanings of these works. In my view, the value of lasting works will still not be buried by the critic's unfair comments. On the other hand, value of artist works can be found out by the critic and sharing this view with people by their appropriate comments.

In the first place, It is true that artist gives society something of lasting value, For example, the famous painting-Dove, which create by Picasso during the Spain Civil War in 1930s, conveys a good will for peace. Today, the UN also adopts this feature of Dove to represent all the people's will for peace.

Furthermore, the critic has its inclination, the comments about the artist's works does not represent the original meaning of these works, the value of artist works will not be overlooked along. For example, Mark Twain's some essays about politics is to reveal corruption and the unfair in election, but some critic in his contemporary, write some articles to criticize Mark Twain's works, and think these essays is objection to society at that time. But today, Mark Twain's essays are accepted by most of people, and those critics who criticize these works are proved that they got money from government by writing the critical articles.   

However, some kinds of artist's works need the critic's comments to explain their meaning before people accept these works. For example, the paintings of impressionism are not be well understood by all the people. The reasonable explanations are necessary for these people to understand. Or, readers can get the spirit of novels by reading the preface of this work. Even some kind of monument is too profound to realize what it represent, for example, the Berlin Wall in Berlin, people who do not know about the history of the Cold War will recognize it as a general wall. After reading the introduction, they can catch the feeling of the people who lived on the two sides of the wall.

All in all, without the critic some kinds of works of the artist will not be better understand, and the critic can help the artist to know the value of the work. Therefore, without judging whether the critic comments function, it is unpersuasive to say it is the artist not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.

[ 本帖最后由 airbots 于 2006-10-24 15:41 编辑 ]

OB叔UID: 188695

下次先把题目贴上

144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of last
ing value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, mu
sic, paintings, etc.

P1:开始立论的时候提出这种“平衡式”的立论对论证不是很容易。

P2:例子说的太简单了。最好先：说出分论点（ts句），然后举例子，然后分析例子，最后再扣题

P4:柏林墙的例子有点不太fit

总体而言，一般

最後の使徒UID: 2257608

有关这个题目，我觉得如果是赞成它的立论的话很不好写

因为肯定是ARTIST创作了经典的，这个几乎用不着论证，因为单有CRITIC的话就没人做东西了……所以命题的关键是CRITIC没有给予社会传世经典

那么这里如果是+的话，那么就应该论证CRITIC在作品成为有价值的经典时没有什么作用，甚至有反面的作用，从这个角度去看，说CRITIC不能起反面作用反而是削弱了+的论证了
而如果是-的话，就要论证CRITIC有很重要的作用（我的那篇就是从这方面写的）

以上我是对题目的一点理解，也不知道恰当与否，希望各位多多交流