寄托天下
查看: 877|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] 【Persistence小组】第1次提纲作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
100
注册时间
2006-11-5
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-2-1 21:54:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
A的outline
  156 :
            1. 没有proof support that newly hired employees' interpersonal skills have been developed though Dickens Academy
            2. no proof establish that the sharp increase in sales and the declination of the number of disgruntled customers has any relationship with the improvement of employees's interpersonal skills
3. Dickens maybe have effect on IMP ,but no proof support it will be effective the same

  42    :  
    1.There are no sufficient proof to support that the foreign visitors arriving at the Bcity's main airport ,maked the statistics of passengers doubled , all come for the ecotourism. They may consist of the people who change planes and the ones come for the other destination like attending an international conference and so forth.
   2.About the 10 percent income increasement. No evidence is provided to support the it is the result of ecotourism developing . the author ignores the other facts ,like more investments , more fortunate oppotunities, solvement of unemployment , pull the economy .
   2*. the two facts above both are irrelated with the purpose of developing ecotourism.
   3.no words tald about the Pcity's self-resource. SO, unless the author can illustrate that the two city have a similiar type of resource , the Pcity should not use the Bcity's experience to develop the ecotourism , in order to increase its own economy .
   4.Even though all above the fallacy have been eliminated , the Pcity still should not appoint the B's National Tourism Office as a consultant .Because no proof to establish that the Bcity's officer is competent for the work in Pcity.The man maybe has no idea about the Pcity's situation like culture, environment , topography and so forth .

   239  :
   1.Wcity宵禁管用,可在D城未必
2.广场无犯罪不能说明别的地方就没有,局部不能概括整体
3.没有证据表明宵禁是否奏效
4.降低犯罪率和降低少年犯罪率不是相同的概念,不能以减低少年犯罪率的方法期望整个城市的总体犯罪率的下降

   67  :
      1.垃圾收集与图书馆两个不相同的运行机制,不能以垃圾的经验让图书馆试验
2.如果使用者基数不大的话20percent 的下降不算什么
3.投诉少不能说明服务质量好,也许是想投诉但由于合并找不到新部门的位置而无法投诉
4.不能因为P图书馆读者的减少20%就让P关闭而用C的,没有明确的交待C的读者数量,也许更少呢  

    25:  
      1. no proof to support the increase in tourism ,new business and the tax revenues all due to the new built golf and resort
2. If built a golf and resort like Ocean View can make benefits to economic and tax recenues , whether it is the best way ? no proof
3. 地理环境上的差异导致不能借鉴 Ocean View的经验  

I 的outline  :

    242 :
    1.要保护地球多样性,资源的种类越是丰富,食物链越多,地球会更有生机与活力。
2.对于濒危物种的保护十分的必要。
(1 )要注意的是,自然界存在优胜劣汰,如果这个物种是被nature给abandon了,科学家花很大的力气拯救也是白搭,终究还是得绝种。
(2)如果是人为因素致使物种濒危的话,必须不惜一切代价拯救,要向大自然补偿人类的过错,要保持生物的多样性
3. 综上,要对人为造成的濒危拯救,自然选择的就拉倒,花大成本留着个活的博物馆没意思

  121  :  同242

   149 :   
            
1.保护环境确实需要资金,政府不能在这方面大量投入,招揽观光客是吸引资金的好方法
2.但是如果在操作环节上没有把握好的话会造成原有环境的破坏,环境会被认为破坏,而破坏的修复可能要花掉相对比投入更多的资金,还有更长的时间几十年甚至上百年
  
3. 因此要在发展与保护中寻求一个平衡,既要发展旅游招揽维护资金,又要注意保护,使环境不能被破坏
例子实在想不到什么了  
  
    145  :   暂空

     169 :  暂空
0 0

使用道具 举报

RE: 【Persistence小组】第1次提纲作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
【Persistence小组】第1次提纲作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-602080-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部