issue141 米国有米二月8日寒假作业 欢迎狠批

cckantUID：2247822

TOPIC: ISSUE141 - "Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity."
WORDS: 547          TIME: 0:55:48          DATE: 2007-2-8

Outline:
1, 生存于一个社会上需要一定的一致性.
2, 但只要有个性才能成功

In the modern era that liberalism prevails, individuality is popular and highly valued as its consistency with the generally accepted ideology. However, some people tend to argue that individuality is overemphasized on its role in personal success, and in particular the economic success. Nonetheless, a close analysis in the relationship of individuality and conformity suggests that it is conformity secures survival in a society and individuality promotes personal success.

To begin with, some extent of conformity is necessary for individual to survive in any society. Firstly, one should recognize that success is a social term. For an insular person belonging to no society, there is no need to define the term of success. For example, Robinson Crusoe, in the novel of same name, who was drifted to a unknown and inaccessible island and thenceforth trapped there, does not have any relevance with success unless he is back to the civilized society, in which even his survival are regarded as success. In his life in the island, concept of live, happy, comfortable and so on are sufficient to descript the whole picture of his life. Therefore, success must merely exist in a society, and its existence relies on other members of the society. Then, it is important for one to have the necessary amount of conformity to ensure him actually being active in a society. Since society is a mean to collaborate for pursuit of common interests, comformity is required for one to participant this collaboration so that the common interests are not impaired. For example, in a primitive society that people hunted for their living. The comformity that people like eating animal meat is quite necessary for one in the society, as it underpinned the premise for the society, that is, people grouped to hunt because animal is the necessary source of food. Therefore, lacking an appropriate extent of conformity, people are less likely to survive in a society. In the modern economy, it is interpreted as people lacking conformity in many aspects are less likely to access to premises for economic success, such as good credit and interpersonal relationship.

However, it is the individuality that differentiates a person and drives him/her out of the mediocrity. Firstly, success is recognizable because of its limited access. Success is not like qualification that passing a cutting line of standards would guarantee the designation. Success rather refers to the very small number of people having phenomenal achievement in a field. Many people can have their own successes. However, the success in a particular field must regard to the achievement of few people. In addition, even though it can not preclude fortunate is one's success, it is recognized that fortunate is relatively insignificant in a broader consideration, such as by higher standards, in a larger community, or in a longer time frame. Hence, as the success is never a random result and that the conformity implies a large number of people having the same profile, conformity only will never enough for personal success. One must be possess distinguishing characteristics before he/she can step out of the possession of the ordinary people to pursue personal success.

In sum, I believe that, while a certain extent of conformity is the necessary condition of success, individuality is more like a sufficient condition, if we extent the analysis to appropriate meaning of conformity and individuality, and ruling out the extreme misfortunate.

[ 本帖最后由 iq28 于 2007-6-23 20:32 编辑 ]

holdingUID：2285054

In the modern era that liberalism prevails, individuality is popular and highly valued as its consistency with the generally accepted ideology. However, some people tend to argue that individuality is overemphasized on its role in personal success, and in particular the economic success. Nonetheless, a close analysis in the relationship of individuality and conformity suggests that it is conformity secures survival in a society and individuality promotes personal success.

To begin with, some extent of conformity is necessary for individual to survive in any society. Firstly, one should recognize that success is a social term. For an insular person (好用法，第一次见) belonging to no society (读起来有点困难，改成not belonging to society) , there is no need to define the term of success. For example, Robinson Crusoe, in the novel of same name, who was drifted to a unknown and inaccessible island and thenceforth trapped there, does not have any relevance with success unless he is back to the civilized society, in which even his survival are regarded as success. In his life in the island, concept of live, happy, comfortable and so on are sufficient to descript the whole picture of his life. Therefore, success must merely exist in a society, and its existence relies on other members of the society. Then, it is important for one to have the necessary amount of conformity to ensure him actually being active in a society. Since society is a mean to collaborate for pursuit of common interests, comformity (conformity) is required for one to participant this collaboration so that the common interests are not impaired. For example, in a primitive society that people hunted for their living. The comformity (conformity) that people like eating animal meat is quite necessary for one in the society, as it underpinned the premise for the society, that is, people grouped to hunt because animal is the necessary source of food. Therefore, lacking an appropriate extent of conformity, people are less likely to survive in a society. In the modern economy, it is interpreted as people lacking conformity in many aspects are less likely to access to premises for economic success, such as good credit and interpersonal relationship.

However, it is the individuality that differentiates a person and drives him/her out of the mediocrity. Firstly, success is recognizable because of its limited access. Success is not like qualification that passing a cutting line of standards would guarantee the designation. Success rather refers to the very small number of people having phenomenal achievement in a field. Many people can have their own successes. However, the success in a particular field must regard to the achievement of few people. In addition, even though it can not preclude fortunate is one's success, it is recognized that fortunate is relatively insignificant in a broader consideration, such as by higher standards, in a larger community, or in a longer time frame. Hence, as the success is never a random result and that the conformity implies a large number of people having the same profile, conformity only will never enough for personal success. One must be possess distinguishing characteristics before he/she can step out of the possession of the ordinary people to pursue personal success.
这段没有例子

In sum, I believe that, while a certain extent of conformity is the necessary condition of success, individuality is more like a sufficient condition, if we extent the analysis to appropriate meaning of conformity and individuality, and ruling out the extreme misfortunate.
语言流畅，但是观点有点简单，只是简单的说了两个方面，也行是这道题本身的缘故，但如果是别的题尽量要使自己的文章更全面一点。