Issue51 GG-Together第一次作业

forwyvernhomUID: 2266412

平衡观点
B1:兴趣对与教育有一定的作用
B2:教育不能普及到每个学生,使其都能够按兴趣发展
     1师资的人数与学生的兴趣对比
     2教育经费能不能够普及



The speaker avers that education assumes an entirely efficacious role on the mere condition that individual's demand and interests can be satisfied. It migth be tempting to agree with the speaker on the basis that interests contribute to the effectiveness of education. However, the speaker ignore certain feasiblity of such specifically designed eduction and whose results are controversial or even unjustifiable.

The implicit rationale behind the speaker's statement seems to be that when it comes to the ultimate objectives of education,individuals' interests are of importance.   After all, education serves to lift the human spirits, which enables people to be less self-centered and more giving of themselves and helps those assume the responsibility toward the entire community,as a result break a new ground for our society with more so called "well-educated" individuals. As for the interest, it stimulates the appetite for knowledge and the craving to discover the uncharted teritory. This is especially true when it come to educational freedom--one term advocates researches in different academica dicipline by which one can purse his individual interests.Education which shows respect to individual interests believes that each student has his or her own potential ability in learning,where interests can inspire such ability.Yet,lack of interests--students might be forced to learn the reluctents--therefore,results in lacking motivations.Meanwhile,possible intellects are being "deposed".In short,interests assume an active role in society's development which is the main purpose of education.

However, the speaker's assertion is troubling in two respects as well. First,it is ill-conceived and barely feasible for the education specifically designed to satisfy every student.Admittedly, education should pay attention to the needs and interests of each student.But we can not simply equate the encouragement to foster students' interests with teaching students according to their interests respectively.For the reason that the finite number of teacher is such a small amount compared with a variety of interests owned by the students.Secondly, educational funding directed by the government can't be equally distributed to each city,each province,say nothing of each college.Certainly,such fundings may go a long way with the educational project.But it is unfortuneate that appropriate fonds might be suscpetible to influence-peddling.What's more,we have to face the fact that the government is now confronted with the poverty,violence,and so forth.What government bolsters is the traditional education--the compulsory education rather than individual education for minority.Thus the speaker's assertion sounds unjustifiable by considering the feasibility of so called "truly effective" education.

In the final analysis,we have to concede that interests indisruptably serve as a boon for the education,which rear plentiful highbrows for the society.Beyond this concession,however,the speaker broaden his assertion to embrace unfeasibe approach for the teachers and the government.

[ 本帖最后由 forwyvernhom 于 2007-2-13 23:49 编辑 ]

唐易UID: 195689

Issue51 GG-Together第一次作业
平衡观点
B1:兴趣对与教育有一定的作用
B2:教育不能普及到每个学生,使其都能够按兴趣发展
     1师资的人数与学生的兴趣对比
     2教育经费能不能够普及



The speaker avers that education assumes an entirely efficacious role on the mere condition that individual's demand and interests can be satisfied. It migth be tempting to agree with the speaker on the basis that interests contribute to the effectiveness of education. However, the speaker ignore certain feasibility of such specifically designed eduction and whose results are controversial or even unjustifiable.

The implicit rationale behind the speaker's statement seems to be that when it comes to the ultimate objectives of education,individuals' interests are of importance.   After all, education serves to lift the human spirits, which enables people to be less self-centered and more giving of themselves and helps those assume the responsibility toward the entire community, (这句语法别扭点，没太看懂）as a result break a new ground for our society with more so called "well-educated" individuals. As for the interest, it stimulates the appetite for knowledge and the craving to discover the uncharted territory. This is especially true when it come to educational freedom--one term advocates researches in different academica dicipline by which one can purse his individual interests.　Education which shows respect to individual interests believes that each student has his or her own potential ability in learning,where interests can inspire such ability.　Yet,lack of interests--students might be forced to learn the reluctents--therefore,results in lacking motivations.Meanwhile,possible intellects are being "deposed".In short,interests assume an active role in society's development which is the main purpose of education.我没看出which是指谁，跟purpose又有啥关系，总之这个结束句有点蹊跷的说。。。

However, the speaker's assertion is troubling in two respects as well. First,it is ill-conceived and barely feasible for the education specifically designed to satisfy every student.Admittedly, education should pay attention to the needs and interests of each student.But we can not simply equate the encouragement to foster students' interests with teaching students according to their interests respectively.For the reason that the finite number of teacher is such a small amount compared with a variety of interests owned by the students.（哇，这句切中要害了，漂亮！）Secondly, educational funding directed by the government can't be equally distributed to each city,each province,say nothing of each college.Certainly,such fundings may go a long way with the educational project. But it is unfortuneate that appropriate fonds might be susceptible to influence-peddling. What's more, we have to face the fact that the government is now confronted with the poverty,violence,and so forth.(这里可以加一句和后面衔接紧密点的话，就是再搭个桥让前后关系连起来)　What government bolsters is the traditional education--the compulsory education rather than individual education for minority（是majority吧？）. Thus the speaker's assertion sounds unjustifiable by considering the feasibility of so called "truly effective" education.

In the final analysis,we have to concede that interests indisruptably serve as a boon for the education,which rear plentiful highbrows for the society.Beyond this concession,however,the speaker broaden his assertion to embrace unfeasibe approach for the teachers and the government.好象没说完啊，再加个结尾吧，收得仓促了点
逻辑上基本没有冲突
如果很八股地看呢，首先在段数上就少点，至少要凑３段才漂亮吗～可以在找点东西，或者把Ｂ２分成两段写～
总体感觉说理部分过重，例子少点，如果很八股地看呢就是论证方法单一　哈哈