寄托天下
查看: 1249|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue51 【METTLE小组】第一次作业 by yangzengli [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
67
注册时间
2007-4-26
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-6-3 20:27:32 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Issue51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
        Should Education only be specifically designed in order to realize its value? In my view we should not narrow our mind on one hand. It is by applying to each student with mix education system amalgamating comprehensive design with specialized design, that education will be truly effective.
       One reason for my viewpoint is that placing too much emphasis on educating specifically but ignoring providing them for basic knowledge will undermine student’s interests to study. In other words, albeit the basic knowledge could not cater to each student’s interests and needs in some ways, it must be comprehensively griped by them. For instance, one talent junior middle school student, having interested in pouring himself into chemistry world, is to be sent into National Chemistry Laboratory to study for several years by policy. Ten years has passed, to educator’s delight, by providing the specialized education with him, the student will soon become an arbiter in his researching field if he declares a paper showing his researching processes and discovery in the standard pattern. Unfortunately, at the expense of losing the opportunity of enhancing language expression in junior middle school, he fails to make his discovery explicitly known to the world. Thus, lacking basic knowledge will actually destroy a genuine, which adumbrated the ineffectiveness of education.
       Another reason for my viewpoint lies in the fact that most of the student’s interests are hidden in their potential ability, needing to be inspired by accepting comprehensively designed education, not only specifically. Assuming that, if a high school student fails to have a broad and thoughtful mind, how could he exploit his interest in such a narrow field and choose his favorite major in the university? How education could be specifically designed to meet individual interests? Thus, the educator should spur students by not ignoring the comprehensively designed education.
       Admittedly, student-centered education will be more effective than teacher-centered education to inspire the student’s interests to study and increasing their ability. Only when basic knowledge has been absorbed deeply by students, can students be separately taught according to their different interests and needs. Such is an effective education system that on the premise of fabulous foundation, the student can sail in his favorite ocean of knowledge freely and enjoy himself absolutely. After that, the students will develop a good habit of study and achieve his goals or realize his value in a positive circulation.
       In sum, the intention of education should be to provide a platform ensuring each student have the chance to realize his own value. Both specialized and comprehensive designs are needed to equip the students with knowledge that they need, while the problem left is to balance between the two.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
434
注册时间
2007-5-25
精华
0
帖子
1
沙发
发表于 2007-6-4 08:11:20 |只看该作者

回复 #1 yangzengli 的帖子

整体结构不错!还用到了很多GRE单词,你的单词基础应该很好。背了很多边了吧?我是你的作文互改parter.你没有加入到这个群吗?没有见到你。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
305
注册时间
2006-12-10
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2007-6-6 14:32:48 |只看该作者
Should Education only be specifically designed in order to realize its value? In my view we should not narrow our mind on one hand(一方面?能理解什么意思但是觉得这词组不是这么用的). It is by applying to each student with mix(ed) education system amalgamating comprehensive design with specialized design, that education will be truly effective.     

One reason for my viewpoint is that placing too much emphasis on educating specifically but ignoring providing them (with) basic knowledge will undermine student’sstudents’ interest toinstudy. In other words, albeit the basic knowledge could not cater to each student’s interests and needs in some ways, it must be comprehensively griped by them(不能理解这句话!似乎前后无转折关系). For instance, one talent junior middle school student, having interested in pouring himself into chemistry world, is to be sent into National Chemistry Laboratory to study for several years by policy. Ten years has passed, to educator’s delight, by providing him (with) the specialized education, the student will soon become an arbiter in his researchingresearch field if he declares a paper showing his researching processed and discovery in the standard pattern. Unfortunately, at the expense of losing the opportunity of enhancing language expression in junior middle school, he fails to make his discovery explicitly known to the world. Thus, lacking basic knowledge will actually destroy a genuine, which adumbrated the ineffectiveness of education.      

Another reason for my viewpoint lies in the fact that most of the student’s (students’) interests are hidden in their potential ability, needing(need能加-ing吗?)to be inspired by accepting comprehensively designed education, not only specifically one. Assuming that, if a high school student fails to have a broad and thoughtful mind, how could he exploit his interest in such a narrow field and choose his favorite major in the university? How education could be specifically designed to meet individual interests? Thus, the educator should spur students (激发什么?) by not ignoring the comprehensively designed education.      

Admittedly, student-centered education will be more effective than teacher-centered education to inspire the student’s interests to study and increasing their ability. Only when basic knowledge has been absorbed deeply by students(去掉更好吧), can students be separately taught according to their different interests and needs. Such is an effective education system that on the premises of fabulous foundation, the student can sail in his favorite ocean of knowledge freely and enjoy himself absolutely. After that, the students will develop a good habit of study and achieve his goals or realize his value in a positive circulation.      

In sum, the intention of education should be to provide a platform ensuring each student have the chance to realize his own value. Both specialized and comprehensive designs are needed to equip the students with knowledge that they need, while the problem left is to balance between the two.

我个人语法比较薄弱,不知道改得对不对,请见凉,但是觉得student一下单数一下复数不是很好吧。

另外在内容上,觉得比较合理,第一段能理解,但是觉得第三段主题跟例证看似脱离。

只是个人浅薄的理解,希望能起到参考作用


[ 本帖最后由 hejielady 于 2007-6-6 14:36 编辑 ]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
67
注册时间
2007-4-26
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2007-6-6 23:39:43 |只看该作者

Issue51 【METTLE小组】第一次作业 by yangzengli(稍修改)

Should Education only be specifically designed in order to realize its value? In my view we should not narrow our mind on one hand. It is by applying to each student with mixed education system amalgamating comprehensive design with specialized design, that education will be truly effective.
       One reason for my viewpoint is that placing too much emphasis on educating specifically but ignoring providing them with basic knowledge will undermine students’ interests to study. In other words, albeit the basic knowledge could not cater to each student’s interests and needs in some ways, they must gripe it comprehensively. For instance, one talent junior middle school student, having interested in pouring himself into chemistry world, is to be sent into National Chemistry Laboratory to study for several years by policy. Ten years has passed, to educator’s delight, by providing the specialized education with him, the student will soon become an arbiter in his field of research if he declares a paper showing his research process and discovery in the standard pattern. Unfortunately, at the expense of losing the opportunity of enhancing language expression in junior middle school, he fails to make his discovery explicitly known to the world. Thus, lacking basic knowledge will actually destroy a genuine, which adumbrated the ineffectiveness of education.
       Another reason for my viewpoint lies in the fact that most of the students’ interests are hidden in their potential ability, needing to be inspired by accepting comprehensively designed education, not only by specific one. Assuming that, if a high school student fails to have a broad and thoughtful mind, how could he exploit his interest in such a narrow field and choose his favorite major in the university? How education could be specifically designed to meet individual interests? Thus, the educator should spur students by not ignoring the comprehensively designed education.
       Admittedly, student-centered education will be more effective than teacher-centered education to inspire the students’ interests to study and increase their ability. Only when basic knowledge has been absorbed, can students be separately taught according to their different interests and needs. Such is an effective education system that on the premise of fabulous foundation, the student can sail in his favorite ocean of knowledge freely and enjoy himself absolutely. After that, the students will develop a good habit of study and achieve his goals or realize his value in a positive circulation.
       In sum, the intention of education should be to provide a platform ensuring each student have the chance to realize his own value. Both specialized and comprehensive designs are needed to equip the students with knowledge that they need, while the problem left is to balance between the two.

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue51 【METTLE小组】第一次作业 by yangzengli [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue51 【METTLE小组】第一次作业 by yangzengli
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-678574-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部