- 最后登录
- 2008-11-3
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 305
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-10
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 309
- UID
- 2282175
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 305
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-10
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
发表于 2007-6-15 22:55:32
|显示全部楼层
21"At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species."
Being extinction of the species is somewhat, in reality, related with human’s behaviors. There for, human race are responsible for taking some measures to protect endangered species. On balance, however, it is do necessary to make extraordinary effort to save them, especially to whom not worth to.
Answering to a sense of morality and culpability, men are imposed to do some remedies to save endangered species. It is very understand that men's irrational behaviors, behaviors like undue chop of trees, pollution of environment and so forth are largely lead to the endangerment of special species, men can never be free to the duty to rescue such situation and then return a live chance of these species.
In addition, seeking for a stable existing environment, men's unconsciousness to protect the endangered species aroused by their increasing sense of security. The ecological balance calls a the humorous co-existence between human beings and animals, for the interests and benefits of ourselves and the generations after generations, we human beings should to take some measures to protect the species which are seriously contribute to the ecological balance. Moreover, as a special type of living things in the world, men are superior to animals in many aspects which enable them the unique ability to change something. For self-preservation, we have no hesitation to neglect our responsibility to remedies. After all, the greater effort we place on, the better life we will enjoy with.
On the other hand, two arguments are present as bellow to substantiate my view that extraordinary efforts on endangered animal is undesirable. The first one lies in the principle that survival of the fittest, apparently, there are many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Under such circumstances, how can men to launch action to protect them beyond their ability? The second one is in that we would weigh to make a decision whether it is worth for to place an effort to save the species life. Man are sensible animal, they would not employ huge money and jobs on a certain species who is not worth for us to do so. It is impossible for men to sacrifice hundreds of lives to save the life of a hardly live species.
In sum, a decision to place effort on the endangered species should be make accordingly. It is never excessive for us to save endangered species from extinction. When it comes to the point of a worthless but expensive-cost beyond men's ability, nonetheless, we are certainly to make a best determination.
[ 本帖最后由 hejielady 于 2007-6-16 14:43 编辑 ] |
|