[i习作temp] issue186 kittymilk [复制链接]

kittymilk
UID: 2328256

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 35
注册时间: 2007-4-15
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2007-7-2 19:30:33 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

It is uncontroverted fact that practicality has been considered to be the great idol –which need most powers and talent to serve. However .it is too extreme to assert that anything is not obviously practical has little value in today’s world.

Consider the necessity around us . we could find that the book store is full of fast-food book which can tell you cooking, adapting your life , addressing your relationship problem and so forth immediately. But the classic which you can find only at the last shelf is almost covered by dust. Because it is unpractical. The convenient store also full of disposal instrument. One-off cups ,bowls, and even clothes. Some china has nothing value except is stand for luxurious taste. And in the companies and some enterprises the practicality is absolutely the compass for any business behavior. Without the practicality, it means lost money. Even the government and the administration advocate the practicality which is considered implying the effectivity and efficiency . if policies have not the obviously practicality , It could be judged as formalization which would be considered a waste of labor and money. Maybe it is the other word of little value.

Based on the above, I almost agree with the speaker’s assertion that anything without the practicality has little value. However I just want to ask that does practicality amount to the value? The samething which to one person is useful , but to another one is useless. The famous speech named I have a dream is compared as the beacon which is in the dark deep sea take the beam to the American. To someone , maybe it’s just a speech ,and the progress is during one more hundred years. It sounds unpractical. Is this without value in it ? As I mentioned before , the classic which is on the dust also have their value by providing us the wisdom, by giving us the chance to understand ourselves in this special approach, by showing the history which can be the mirror of our lives .and so forth. And the classic is the way to transmit our culture and our civilization. So , I would like to support that the thing which is not obviously practical also have value in nowadays- which depend on the people who consider about them or use them .

I should say that something which is in your need have the quite value estimated only by yourselves. The speed-up cook book for a housewife is very good , so the book has value only to the housewife but not a farmer or someone else. Mathematical instrument is very important to a scientist, but to a writer is just like a hard word which is not easy to explain. The national ideality which is inane to one person but to the country and the nation is a the Supreme end leading to prosperity and puissance. In a word, practicality, as a macroscopical objective, we should strive for it ,but the recessive value which we should be caution to.

[ 本帖最后由 yogurt4 于 2007-7-2 20:40 编辑 ]