Issue29 【SWEETBOX小组】 第八次作业 by 小破孩

小破孩UID: 2125288

Issue29
Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.

Outlines:
1. For popular stars or artists, they should expect people’s wide interest in almost all aspects of their life with their fans’ zealous fascination and strong mimic desire.
2. For politicians, people’s interests in them are not that strong, still the politicians should know that they are considered as models of the nation.
3. The similar problems for athletes might not be that serious, although they also bring back honor to the nation, due to the short exposure to the public and long time closed training, some are barely known by the public, so their worry about losing privacies would be slight.

After the exposure of photographs of Chief of Hong Kong broadcasting Department at local pub with a glamorous girl yesterday, almost all the newspapers put the news on their front page. Although spoken man from the government exclaims that it is quite normal as a private activity after work, the Chief still make an announcement apologizing for any potential influence. Should public figures expect losing at least some of their privacies when they choose their career path? From my point of view, this is definitely the truth, although the degree of losing privacies might various.

For popular singers or actors, they should definitely expect the public's wide interests in almost all aspects of their life with their fans' zealous fondness and strong mimic desire. From the period from teenagers to the adolescents, there is a common phenomenon that young people become more resistant to their parents or instructors, yet more fascinated to those famous actors or singers. They love their films or songs, mimic their frequently used oral phrases and dressing styles, and want to know every detail in their life off stage, treating these public figures as their idols. One example is Andy Lau, the most attractive and popular star in Hong Kong entertaining industry. No matter where he is, what he is doing, whether his behavior is relevant to its work or not, reporters always follow him and spread any change related to him. To Andy, it is quite clear that his career doesn't belong to himself, but the public who loves his works, and expects the sacrifice of his own privacy once he decided to get in the field. It may be a little bit exaggerate to say that, for popular stars, when no one is interested in your private life, you are out of the step, yet it does reflect the truth. Thus, together with charming laudations, supports and favors from the audience, pubic figures such as singers or actors should be ready to expose their secrets and private life.

For politicians, people's desire to leery their private life may not be that vehement, still, they should always remind themselves as representatives and models of the nation and expect certain degree of privacy loss. As mentioned above, what the Chief of Hong Kong Broadcasting Department has contributed to the development of Hong Kong entertainment industry might not draw our attention. Even if he had made great efforts to push it stepping forward or provide healthy competition environment, such achievements might not strike the public compared to his ramble in the pubs with fancy girl. To some extent, how excellent one politician have done in his position might not interests the public since those are his routine duties, yet as long as there are any sign of improper behaviors in their private life, they may face tremendous condemn from the society. For public figures like politicians, with labeling of decent and deserves admire from the public, should pay special attention to their private life, with any blemish damage their reputation and people's trusts.

Comparatively, for certain other public figures such as athletes, they should not worry too much about losing their private life due to less familiarity from the public. Usually, for an athlete to become a public figure, gold medals and excellent performance in any competitions are necessary. However, facing the challenge from his or her peers and strong competitors around the world, athletes may need to join the training programs for  years, with most of the time in a closed stadium and little connection with the outside world. Even during the competitions, they might not come into the audience's focus until in the last few rounds. At the same time, due to the high requirement of physical strength of the body, their competing time is rather limited, with many previous Olympic players turn to work in other careers in their later time. Therefore, with less attention from the public, athletes may not face too many barriers in scooping their private life as long as they are not taking advantage these honors to turn into public figures in other fields. And they may expect less lost of private life.

Taken together, it might be safe for us to draw a conclusion that public figures like actors, politicians, or athletes would lose their privacy to various degrees. As long as one decides to become renown in the field, he has to lose at least some of his privacy as sort of trade off.

jiangyue011UID: 2340595

seat taken.

关于你提到的跑题的问题，写关注的影响和过分关注的危害我觉得也无妨，并非跑太远。看了老美的范文最后也讲到了过分暴露的坏处。另外我以前说的那个47，does not类的题目也可以写一段为什么Should.Issue是相对开放一点的题目，看北美范文精讲上面说131甚至写成并非只有艺术能揭示社会隐藏的动力。不过，我觉得为了保险，不写更好。

[ 本帖最后由 jiangyue011 于 2007-7-14 23:58 编辑 ]

jiangyue011UID: 2340595

After the exposure of photographs of Chief of Hong Kong broadcasting Department at local pub with a glamorous girl yesterday, almost all the newspapers put the news on their front page. Although spoken man from the government exclaims that it is quite normal as a private activity after work, the Chief still make an announcement apologizing for any potential influence. （这个背景叙述我觉得还不如调整到正文中呢）Should public figures expect losing at least some of their privacies when they choose their career path? From my point of view, this is definitely the truth, although the degree of losing privacies might various.

For popular singers or actors, they should definitely expect the public's wide interests in almost all aspects of their life with their fans' zealous fondness and strong mimic desire. From the period from teenagers to the adolescents, there is a common phenomenon that young people become more resistant to their parents or instructors, yet more fascinated to those famous actors or singers. They love their films or songs, mimic their frequently used oral phrases and dressing styles, and want to know every detail in their life off stage, treating these public figures as their idols. One example is Andy Lau, （我写的时候是一个国外的演员的全名也没拼写出来，虽然andy lau未必被老外所知，但我觉得也无所谓）the most attractive and popular star in Hong Kong entertaining industry. No matter where he is, what he is doing, whether his behavior is relevant to its work or not, reporters always follow him and spread any change related to him. To Andy, it is quite clear that his career doesn't belong to himself, but the public who loves his works, and expects the sacrifice of his own privacy once he decided to get in the field. It may be a little bit exaggerate to say that, for popular stars, when no one is interested in your private life, you are out of the step,(stage） yet it does reflect the truth. Thus, together with charming laudations, supports and favors from the audience, pubic figures such as singers or actors should be ready to expose their secrets and private life.

For politicians, people's desire to leery their private life may not be that vehement, still, they should always remind themselves as representatives and models of the nation and expect certain degree of privacy loss（得加句如果EXPOSURE的话） As mentioned above, what the Chief of Hong Kong Broadcasting Department has contributed to the development of Hong Kong entertainment industry might not draw our attention. Even if he had made great efforts to push it stepping forward or provide healthy competition environment, such achievements might not strike the public compared to his ramble in the pubs with fancy girl.（Hong Kong Broadcasting Department 的chief不是politician,而且你哪mention above拉？并且你是假设论证？没有这个丑闻发生？那我觉得还不如Clinton的那个丑闻呢） To some extent, how excellent one politician have done in his position might not interests the public since those are his routine duties, yet as long as there are any sign of improper behaviors in their private life, they may face tremendous condemn from the society. For public figures like politicians, with labeling（rebelling?）of decent and deserves admire from the public, should pay special attention to their private life, with any blemish damage their reputation and people's trusts.(后半句不是很通)

Comparatively, for certain other public figures such as athletes, they should not worry too much about losing their private life due to less familiarity from the public. Usually, for an athlete to become a public figure, gold medals and excellent performance in any competitions are necessary. However, facing the challenge from his or her peers and strong competitors around the world, athletes may need to join the training programs for  years, with most of the time in a closed stadium and little connection with the outside world. Even during the competitions, they might not come into the audience's focus until in the last few rounds. At the same time, due to the high requirement of physical strength of the body, their competing time is rather limited, with（这个词在这似乎衔接不太好）many previous Olympic players turn to work in other careers in their later time. Therefore, with less attention from the public, athletes may not face too many barriers in scooping their private life as long as they are not taking advantage these honors to turn into public figures in other fields. And they may expect less lost（loss）of private life. 这段的意思好像是说因为不出名，所以要暴露而出名，呵呵，在其他行业好像也是哦
Taken together, it might be safe for us to draw a conclusion that public figures like actors, politicians, or athletes would lose their privacy to various degrees. As long as one decides to become renown in the field, he has to lose at least some of his privacy as sort of trade off.

语言我觉得还是比较通顺的，不像你说的那样。

[ 本帖最后由 jiangyue011 于 2007-7-15 18:39 编辑 ]