Issue5【07-10G Superstar大帖】27日模考，by gyyx

gyyxUID: 2290150

TOPIC: ISSUE5 - "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."
WORDS: 495          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2007-7-27 15:05:13

This issue focuses on which should be taught in school, and who should determine the curriculum. The author resorts to national curriculum, rather than local curriculum. However, in my opinion, national curriculum should be taught, while different parts of the nation have rights to offer some local courses suit for their situation.

As all we know, education is a key topic of this era. It is a method cultivating children with knowledge and adapt them to the society. For children's sake, an education should contain all common knowledge involved in life, which varies in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and so forth. Though the study of science knowledge, the children could know their life better, they may know why ice become water, how to put out a fire and so on. All these commonsense should be included in every curriculum no matter who determine. Nonetheless, if this curriculum is determined by a national organization, it could have some benefits. First, as university is a national high education organization, it enrolls from all over the country. If all parts of the nation have their own curriculum, the standard for enrolling is hard to establish. Universities have to set down their own rules to identify students' ability, which is a waste to some extent. And, universities may compete in good source of students, which is harmful to their academic functions. Secondly, national curriculum has benefits on teachers' cultivation, for they could save time and money, and more convenient for them to communicate. Thirdly, which is the most important, education is an obligation of a country, they have more time more people to survey, to explore, to research what suit for the students most. Aside from this science knowledge, the education of one country always tries to teach the people their value through formal education. A citizen must know his/her country's history, culture, and art, so as to patriotically to the country and could devote himself/herself to this country. All these knowledge should be determined by nation, as they know more about the situation all over the country, not to emphasizing any part.

However, some local governments have the rights and obligation to offer some courses for their citizens, in order to make them more suits for life in the part. For example, a city nearby sea should choose swimming as a compulsory course for their students, thus they could enjoy themselves more freely and save their lives in the sea. Additionally, it is very essential for a local course to teach some important culture of their own, such as their local language, their custom, especially in minority areas. This curriculum may help them save and hand their culture down.

So, as a conclusion, the same national curriculum do not mean local parts lose their feature and freedom, this need is an more economical, and more proper for a nation, for all the country's students. And, local parts also could offer curriculum suitable to their students. Both these could benefits a child's growth.

学野UID: 2155973

TOPIC: ISSUE5 - "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."
WORDS: 495          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2007-7-27 15:05:13

This issue focuses on which should be taught in school, and who should determine the curriculum. The author resorts to national curriculum, rather than local curriculum. However, in my opinion, national curriculum should be taught, while different parts of the nation have rights to offer some local courses suit for their situation.观点鲜明，gyyx的一贯作风哈

As all we know, education is a key topic of this era. It is a method cultivating children with knowledge and adapt them to the society. For children's sake, an education should contain all common （general/basic) common重在平凡之意knowledge involved in life, which varies in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and so forth. Though the study of science knowledge, the children could know their life better, they may know why ice become water, how to put out a fire and so on. All these commonsense should be included in every curriculum no matter who determine. Nonetheless, if this curriculum is determined by a national organization, it could have some benefits. First Firstly与后面照应, as university is a national high education organization, it enrolls from all over the country. If all parts of the nation have their own curriculum, the standard for enrolling is hard to establish. Universities have to set down their own rules to identify students' ability, which is a waste to some extent. And, universities may compete in good source of students, which is harmful to their academic functions. Secondly, national curriculum has benefits on teachers' cultivation, for they could save time and money, and more convenient for them to communicate. Thirdly, which is the most important, education is an obligation of a country, they have more time more people to survey, to explore, to research what suit for the students most. Aside from this science knowledge, the education of one country always tries to teach the people their value through formal education. A citizen must know his/her country's history, culture, and art, so as to patriotically to the country and could devote himself/herself to this country. All these knowledge should be determined by nation, as they know more about the situation all over the country, not to emphasizing any part.最后可以来一句关于这段的总结~

However, some local governments have the rights and obligation to offer some courses for their citizens, in order to make them more suits for life in the part. For example, a city nearby sea should choose swimming as a compulsory course for their students, thus they could enjoy themselves more freely and save their lives in the sea. Additionally, it is very essential for a local course to teach some important culture of their own, such as their local language, their custom, especially in minority areas. This curriculum may help them save （preserve)and hand their culture down.例子生动有力！偶喜欢，不过这段有些单薄，如果观点偏向平衡的话，这段应该加强些

So, as a conclusion, the same national curriculum do not mean local parts lose their feature and freedom, this need is an more economical, and more proper for a nation, for all the country's students. And, local parts also could offer curriculum suitable to their students. Both these could benefits a child's growth.结尾还是favor 平衡观点阿~那么上一段就要多写点了，呵呵 总体语言没什么问题，就是布局上有些不合理，可能是一限时，后面都没时间展开了，我也经常这样，所以才开始采用先写提纲再展开的办法。。。加油啊~偶觉得你肯定能拿4冲5的~

huaxinluoboUID: 2326780

写得不错啊，加油！