- 最后登录
- 2010-4-18
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 151
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-10
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 6
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 258
- UID
- 2348359

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 151
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-10
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 6
|
发表于 2007-7-27 16:30:19
|显示全部楼层
OPIC: ISSUE150 - "Because of television and worldwide computer connections, people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited. As a result, tourism will soon become obsolete."
WORDS: 532 TIME: 01:12:50 DATE: 2007-7-26 16:22:50
With the development of science and cross-culture communication, the world become increasing smaller. Through television and worldwide computer connections, people can communication with people from different parts of the world and become familiar with a great many places that they have never been to. The kind of international displace true influence daily life of people, but I do not agree with the assertion that tourism will soon become obsolete. Television and worldwide computer connection will help tourism more popular.
There are several displaces that television and worldwide computer connection have influence on the tourism. Firstly, advertisement transmitted by television or internet attractive people's attention, which the beautiful scene and special custom hardly by transmitted through newspaper or broadcast different from decades. Through television and internet we can see longer-river all over the world, mysterious world of submarine, extraordinary communication with different ethnic people. This is more interesting than just express by words. Secondly, through television and worldwide computer connection is not only spread the scene but also transmit culture and the circumstances of country. What's more, it is the best way increase investment. The government will encourage foreign friends to come their country not only for tourism. So with the help of government, the tourism will not off-date. Such as the Los Angeles Olympic Games in 1997 can finally be hold in Los Angeles relate to the tourism diplomacy project, through which invite the servant of Olympic group travel this city by helicopter.
Compare with watching television or perceive through worldwide computer, tourism may brings you more precious experiences, such as living of summer scenes, delicious special food, make friend with local people, which can not obtain through internet or digital-transmission instrument. For example, you may know Beijing is a famous tourism place, and as a old saying:” If you have never been to Great-wall, you are would not be a successful man.’ If you have been to Great-wall, you can not believe the beautiful scenes in there. If you haven’t been BeiJing, you can never understand the appetizing test just by imagination. Tourism can give you the particular achievement can not be substituted by other method. In the opposite, through dissemination of television or globe mass media this famous place would attractive more attention, in which encourage more people choose tourism.
There are other factor may contribute to the decline tendency of tourism, such as time and chance, not the affluence of television program or globe mass media. With development of economy, the pace of work and living become increased rapid. For lack of leisure, people have litter chance for tourism, instead of busying with career and the accumulation of capital or personal affairs. They did not have the time and energy for tourism, but if they get the chance they will choose tourism. According to survey Tourism Department of Government, 83% travel family choose tourism in the long-time vacation, such as the labor’s Day, spring festal Day, when people have one or two week holiday.
In sum, without consider other factors may influence on the tourism we can not draw the conclusion that tourism became obsolete. In the opposite, the dissemination of television and globe mass media may boosts tourism.
TOPIC: ARGUMENT165 - The following appeared in a business magazine.
"As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."
WORDS: 346 TIME: 00:58:36 DATE: 2007-7-26 16:22:50
In this argument, the author provide several evidence to support that the cans do not have the chemicals that posed a health risk, through insufficient reasons and false assumption that may misleading the readers.
In the first place, this article come from a business magazine may appear as the advertisement of this company. So the attitude of these surveys may lake of just. The author claims that "as a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea", the author did not tell us ideographic information about these complaint, which may accompanied with the business all the time, may have no complaint last year. The false inspect time may helpless to reveal the problem. What’s more consider the comprehensive information of sample, these hazardous chemicals may not contain in the eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year, which can not guarantee the just of investigation.
The author provides two evidences to support his assertion. One of the evidences is that chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. Another evidence is that other risk chemicals remaining suspected are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods. The conclusion is premature without consider other possible risk chemicals out of the range of the eight chemicals, may also cause dizziness and nausea.
The other evidence is that there chemicals, which chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods. Without exact survey statistic information, such as the contain level of the chemicals. We can not draw the conclusion that contain of chemicals under the level of healthy standard.
In sum, more information should be provide such as the range of samples, the statistic of chemical level and respective health standards, and the correct time of investigation. Consider these factors, the conclusion of Promofoods produces cans did not contain deleterious chemicals that posed a health risk. |
|