Issue169 中暑后写的,貌似逻辑不好,请拍...

g.10.fightingUID: 2347826

TOPIC: ISSUE169 - "Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other."
WORDS: 519          TIME: 00:36:52          DATE: 2007-7-31 11:40:42

I strongly support that the claim of “those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other."

Every two things in the world will have relationship between them, like the politics and morality. Morality is the basic rule of politic, politic is the agency of morality. Many politicians held high morality, so that, to treat their politic very well. Such as, Gandy, who was the leader of Indian. He proposed that no violence, no cooperation. This policy was contacted with his high morality. This policy was widely received by Indians and they began to silence defeat. At last, they won. However they political do not have high morality, which will bring worse things, like blood, immolate, and war, and so on. Take Hitler for example, he was a political in German, but without morality, he broke out the 2nd world war, even promote genocidal, millions of Jews died, and so many counties dropped in war, people lived in barrier, they lost home, relatives, lives etc.

For modern time there is also have political person, who ignore morality. Bill Clinton was former president of America. He did very well in his political field, but he has sexual scandal with Lewinsky. Though he admitted his mistake, morality inside public wouldn't accept it. So he lay off. However, his wife, a woman showed high morality in this event, and more and more has political minds, would compete president seat.

From above examples, we know that if the politic without morality, it won't stand long; opposite, if the politic stand with morality, it will be memorized by people. So if one cut the relationship between politics and morality, he will not succeed. Some researchers may concern their study in one part. This can point the energy, time, money etc. on the subject, like politics or morality. But subjects has crossing, they live together, not alone; they learn from each other, not just find new thing in its own area; they get advance will promote the other's developing, not step by itself.

Politic and morality has billions of relationships, but they still two things. One can not instead of the other, but they can affect each other. They are different, whatever in root, in using, in effective. Morality can deep politics developing, however, the politics can give the same back to morality. As the politics is brownstone’s politics, if the politics obey his willing, they will be not pushed; if nor, will be deleted? Like in the play named "Prison Break" the new energy politics barrier brownstone beneficial, they put the main person in the prison. This is not morality, but it is true politics.

Above all, we can't separate politics or morality.  Facts proved that “those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other."  We should use developing eyes to see problems, though they are two things, like the two faces of one coin. If we forget one face, the coin may more valuable, but it is useless in market.

[ 本帖最后由 g.10.fighting 于 2007-7-31 17:36 编辑 ]

g.10.fightingUID: 2347826

:confused: 发现自己貌似没有什么逻辑可言...555...
天气怎么这么热啊???中暑好难受...

AlexInAWUID: 2349849

请恕直言，LZ的逻辑确实不怎么好。毕竟拍文章是同主题的义务，所以我建议LZ花上两三个小时仔细修改，我可以抽时间再看看。
这里先说几个我能发现的大问题，语法问题LZ要把文章丢到word里去，然后逐一理解它的语法错误分析。

I strongly support that the claim of “those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other."
开头不能照搬，至少要转述，而且一句话也太少了。

Every two things in the world will have relationship between them, like the politics and morality.（我认为马克思主义的这句话慎用，因为这句实际上是一个废话） Morality is the basic rule of politic, politic is the agency of morality. Many politicians held high morality, so that, to treat their politic very well. Such as, Gandy, who was the leader of Indian. He proposed that no violence, no cooperation. This policy was contacted with his high morality. This policy was widely received by Indians and they began to silence defeat. At last, they won. However they political do not have high morality, which will bring worse things, like blood, immolate, and war, and so on. Take Hitler for example, he was a political in German, but without morality, he broke out the 2nd world war, even promote genocidal, millions of Jews died, and so many counties dropped in war, people lived in barrier, they lost home, relatives, lives etc.
（我认为甘地的例子不是很对，因为个人觉得非暴力不抵抗并不是道德问题，而是自然神论者的世界观问题。）

For modern time there is also have political person, who ignore morality. Bill Clinton was former president of America. He did very well in his political field, but he has sexual scandal with Lewinsky. Though he admitted his mistake, morality inside public wouldn't accept it. So he lay off. However, his wife, a woman showed high morality in this event, and more and more has political minds, would compete president seat. （克林顿的scandal公认并不是他的大错，作为政治家他还是好样的，例子要改，而且单一例子不要独开一段）

From above examples, we know that if the politic without morality, it won't stand long; opposite, if the politic stand with morality, it will be memorized by people. So if one cut the relationship between politics and morality, he will not succeed. Some researchers may concern their study in one part. This can point the energy, time, money etc. on the subject, like politics or morality. But subjects has crossing, they live together, not alone; they learn from each other, not just find new thing in its own area; they get advance will promote the other's developing, not step by itself. （这一段看不懂）

Politic and morality has billions of relationships, but they still two things. One can not instead of the other, but they can affect each other. They are different, whatever in root, in using, in effective. Morality can deep politics developing, however, the politics can give the same back to morality. As the politics is brownstone’s politics, if the politics obey his willing, they will be not pushed; if nor, will be deleted? Like in the play named "Prison Break" the new energy politics barrier brownstone beneficial, they put the main person in the prison. This is not morality, but it is true politics. （这一段也看不懂）

Above all, we can't separate politics or morality.  Facts proved that “those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other."  We should use developing eyes to see problems, though they are two things, like the two faces of one coin. If we forget one face, the coin may more valuable, but it is useless in market.