- 最后登录
- 2008-10-7
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 183
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-8-29
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 171
- UID
- 2246937
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 183
- 注册时间
- 2006-8-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
WORDS: 495 TIME: 1:05:00 DATE: 2007-8-1
Nowadays, as the commercial atmosphere is more and more widespread in the society, many people now hold such a belief that any means taken to attain it is justifiable when the goal is worthy. I think that although using some special ways to achieve reasonable aims is usually preferable, such opinions should not be used abusively, especially when it is against laws and our moral standards. In these cases, it is not advisable to achieve the final goal, and under certain other circumstances, it is difficult to make a clearly decision.
To begin with, it is often effective and quicker to reach the aim when we use certain legal and immoral but special means. A typical example is that a few years ago, an American wished to be a millionaire and he made a website which only had a picture of 1000x1000 pixels. He sold one point on the picture for a US dollar, and now it is said that he is already on the halfway (more than 500,000 of all pixel are sold). Such novelties now usually happen. The originality of his money-making plan is so creative that lots of people felt interesting, and one dollar is not so much money. All these factors predict that he will success. Such cases bring great amount of fortune to individuals, but do not make negative influence on society. From this point of view, it is acceptable to achieve one's goal in special ways.
However, abusive generalization of such idea is dangerous and harmful to both individuals and the whole society. If the statement that it is justifiable to take any means to achieve the goal, the clerks may steal money from the companies, enterprises may escaping from paying taxes, judges and government officials may soon corrupt, and the normal order of the society is devastated. No one wish to see such scene happen, thus when we talk about this problem, the potential prerequisite is that we should obey laws and what we do should not damage the existing regulation of the society.
More often, when we consider whether it is justifiable to attain a goal, we are led to a moral dilemma that we can hardly decide what is right and what is wrong. Such news is not rare that a person regarded very kind by his neighbors was found appropriate public money in the company because he could not afford his father's treatment for cancer and he failed to borrow enough from others. Ethically, his neighbor believed he did the right thing, while objectively he was guilty. When moral standards conflict with laws, whether an action is justifiable is no easily decided.
In a sum, achieving a goal though legal way is usually preferable; however, it is not advisable and often accusable to break the law or generally accepted ethics; and when we decide whether a means is justifiable, we often have different and controversial standards, which makes it hard to draw a final decision.
|
|