寄托天下
查看: 1212|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] argument51 [0710G +U Aug小组]第19次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
507
注册时间
2006-11-20
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-8-12 23:11:30 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
In this newsletter, the author claims that patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain should take antibiotics to help healing quickly since the secondary infections which prevent the recuperation might be conquered by this way. Further reflection, however, tells us there are several logical problems involved within this argument, which render it unconvincing.

To begin with, the recommendation is built up on the assumption that secondary infections may prevent patients from healing after severe muscle strain. Yet no evidence has been provided that these secondary infections really exist in the healing process of muscle strain. Even if the first group patients who take antibiotics regularly heal faster than average, it does not demonstrate those patients have secondary infections. Without the firm evidence to prove the assumption, it is unreasonable to conclude that overcoming secondary infections by taking antibiotics regularly will be helpful for recuperation from muscle strain.

Secondly, another question involved within this argument is the reliability of the cited comparison. The author points out the first group patients who take antibiotics regularly heal faster than average, while the second group patients who take sugar pills instead do not perform better than average. However, the argument does not show the other relevant treatment conditions which might affect the recuperation as well. For example, patients’ healthy situations, such as age, sex, disease history and living environment, doctor's treating experience and muscle recuperative training program. Lacking the consideration of the complexity of the disease recuperation, we can not simply conclude it is the antibiotics that accelerate the healing from muscle strain.

In conclusion, the recommendation of taking antibiotics to help recuperation from muscle strain is not well supported. To strengthen it the author should provide more evidence that the secondary infections really exist and block the recuperation. A reliable compare research is also necessary, in which the patients’ healthy conditions, the doctors’ medical level and all the other treatments should maintain the same except the using of antibiotics.


:( 还是没有限时成功啊,只写到第三段的一半 T_T      当时只有200字,:(
所以我补了个结尾段就发上来了
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
360
注册时间
2007-4-30
精华
0
帖子
44

烤鸭必胜

沙发
发表于 2007-8-17 15:04:10 |只看该作者
发现你的arg写得真的不错,就是时间问题。错误找的对,模版也用的很好。加油。

使用道具 举报

RE: argument51 [0710G +U Aug小组]第19次作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
argument51 [0710G +U Aug小组]第19次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-721308-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部