issue83 [0710G 戴三个表冲刺小组] 第22次作业

pinuoUID: 2328081

Syllabus1.       同意保护那些疆域范围内的偏远地带，保持他们的原始状态。因为这个对于整个国家很重要，和字体的major city一样。但反对刻意的要求这些地方保持原始的生活方式，因为这样不利于这些地区的发展，对这里的人不公平。
2.       首要，保护这里的自然和生态。对整个国家和世界的自然和环境都很重要。global warming, air pollution from vehicles and engines, ozone depletion, acid rain, etc野生地区应当予以保护：因为第一，野生地区有丰富的动、植物资源，具有很高的研究价值，如果没有保护的话，物种可能会灭绝Tibet antelope, wild horse, giant panda, imminent danger of extinction；Professor Edward O. Wilson, leading scientist in the fiield of biology and environment, predicted that an average of 100 species disappear from our planet each single day. 第二，野生自然地区的状况对于环境、气候影响也有影响；Wet lands decompose waste—and presumably harmful—matters discharged by human beings, maintaining water and prevent our cities from the threats of aridity. And it most effectively—more so than any artificial ecological systems--takes up CO2, one of the decisive gas that caused global warming, and releases oxygen upon which all animals, including humans survive.
Wet lands decompose waste—and presumably harmful—matters discharged by human beings, maintaining water and prevent our cities form the threats of aridity. And it most effectively – more so than any artificial ecological systems—takes up CO2, one of the decisive gases that caused global warming, and releases oxygen upon which all animals, including humans survive.

Professor Edward O. leading scientists in the field of biology and environment, predicated that an average of 100 species disappear from our planet each single day.
3.  自然，这些地区的生活习俗，其为独特性，是社会的遗产，应该保存保护这里的故建筑。鼓励他们保留自己的风俗，鼓励他们使用自己的文字和语言
4.  但是，不能刻意的保护，使这些地区一直保留一种落后的生活和生产。这样对他们不公平。他们应该和其他地区的人一样，享受社会发展的社会进步。如他们应当用到电视，广播，甚至使Internet，这里的孩子应该鼓励到外面去念书，了解外面的世界。
5.In sum保护应该保护的，习俗，人文，但不应强制他们落后。

TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 606          TIME: 00:48:15          DATE: 2007-8-19 16:17:45

I strongly agree with the assertion that public owned wilderness areas fairly deserve the government attention, even they are often the remote areas, because of their special influence on the development of country and the world compared with the major cities which generally consicder of more importance. Thoung, it is, in my understanding, a little extreme to preserve these areas in their natural state strikely because it is pratically hard to achieve this goal and also unfair for the citizens living in theser areas.

The first reason I fundamentally agree with the assertion lies in the privol role the wilderness areas plays in the environmental aspects. Few will argue that the environmental problems have became increasingly serious for for every contry of the world, especially the great development in industralization and technology, which benefit our life in neary all the aspects besides environment, made these even worse. The global warming, ozone depletion, the extinction of species, air polution, water polution are threatening the very survivle of the all the people living in this planet. Professor Edward, leading the scientists in the areaso of ecology and environment, predicted that there are an average of 100 species dispear from this planet every single day. The preservation of wilderness can help us ease the pressure of pollution and other environmental problems. Return to the problems of extinction species, for example, most of these species are living in the wilderness, it is the over cultivate,disforestry and other human activities in these areas which help people take advantage of the resource the nature present us destroy the living environment for these species, thus force them on the edge of extinction. Such animals giant panda, Tibet enlop and the like. Another example is the significant enfluence of wet land in wilderness areas, which desconpose the waste--preconsumed harmfully--such as CO2 which considered one decisive gas that caused the global warming.  In short, preserving the wilderness areas, and restraint the human activties in theser areas provide an effective way to solve the environmental problems which troubled us greatly. And in this case, if we can preserve these areas in their natural state will be the most ideal solution.

Another I agree with the assertion has to do with the culture aspects. These areas, more often than not, are the places where the life are least affected by the industrialization and technology, not like the big cities where the technologies play a vital role, which reduce the history and tradition element in people's minds as well the way  they are living while the bring convinience and happiness, thus the customs, rituals, and even languages are perfectly protected. You, are interested in the traditions of these areas, need look no further the simple way of their daily life, which are exacly the same as the predecessors did thousands years ago. And the house they are living can help us know the architectures styles in history, serve as a valuable proof of the research work. The language usually, which would have been dramaticly modified in the communication with the people from different areas, remained the their features as before because of less communication with the people outside. Thus preservation of these areas also provide us a good way to learn the culture and history which are part of nation's culture and history.

In sum, it is highly critical to preserve the wilderness areas in their natural state for the interests of the people living there and those not living there in terms of environmental aspects and cultural aspects, and other aspects besides mentioned. Netheless, it is highly unlikely pratical to preserve these areas in their natural state.

pinuoUID: 2328081

改了小错误。

I strongly agree with the assertion that public owned wilderness areas fairly deserve the government attention, even they are often the remote areas, because of their special influence on the development of country and the world compared with the major cities which generally consider of more importance. Though, it is, in my understanding, a little extreme to preserve these areas strictly in their natural state because it is practically hard to achieve this goal and also unfair for the citizens living in these areas.

The first reason I fundamentally agree with the assertion lies in the privol(pivot) role the wilderness areas plays in the environmental aspects. Few will argue that the environmental problems have became increasingly serious for every country of the world, especially the great development in industrialization and technology, which benefit our life in nearly all the aspects besides environment, made these even worse. The global warming, ozone depletion, the extinction of species, acid rain, air pollution and water pollution are threatening the very survive of the all the people living in this planet. Professor Edward, leading the scientists in the areas of ecology and environment, predicted that an average of 100 species disappear from this planet every single day. The preservation of wilderness area can help us ease the pressure of pollution and other environmental problems effectively. Return to the problems of extinction species, for example, most of these species are living in the wilderness, it is the over cultivate, disforest and other human activities in these areas which help people take advantage of the resource the nature present us destroy the living environment for these species, thus throw them on the edge of extinction. Such species include giant panda, Tibet antelope, wild horse and the like, which have focused the attention of humans. Another example is the significant influences of wet land in wilderness areas, which decompose the waste— and presumed harmfully — matters, discharged by human beings, maintaining water and prevent our cities from the threat of aridity. And it most effective—more so than any artificial ecological system—take up CO2, which considered one decisive gas that caused the global warming, and releases oxygen upon which all animals, including humans survive. In short, preserving the wilderness areas and limit the human activities in these areas provide an effective way to solve the environmental problems which troubled us seriously. And in this case, if we can preserve these areas in their natural state will be the most ideal solution (the best solution is to preserve these areas in their natural state and stop any human activities in these areas. Though it is practically impossible and not reasonable to forbidden all the human works there and put them in the totally natural state, because it is over explore that inflicts on the nature their, seeking a balance between exploration and preservation is a practical solution.)

Another reason I agree with the assertion has to do with the cultural aspects. These areas, more often than not, are the places where the life are least affected by the industrialization and technology, not like the big cities where the technologies play a vital role, which reduce the history and tradition element in people's minds as well the way they are living while the bring vast convenience and happiness, thus the customs, rituals, and even languages are perfectly protected. You, if are interested in the traditions of these areas, need look no further than the simple way of their daily life, which are exactly the same as the predecessors did thousands years ago. And the house they are living can help us know the architectures styles in history, serve as a valuable and live proof of the research work. The language, which would have been dramatically modified in the process of communication with the people from different areas, remained their features as before because of less communication with the people outside. Thus preservation of these areas provides us an effective way to learn the culture and history which are also part of nation's culture and history and are as valuable as other cultural heritage. In this case, it is totally unreasonable—and even unacceptable –to preserve these area in totally natural state, because it is extremely unfair for the people living in these area, who are supposed to have the equal right as the people living in the big cities to enjoy what the social and technological development bring to all the people. It is not rational decision of democratic nation to force parts of their people to remain poverty and less developed just in order to preserve these areas. A better solution is to encourage they preserve their custom, ritual and language while help them improve their life.

In sum, it is highly critical to preserve the wilderness areas for the interests of the people living there and those not living there in terms of environmental aspects and cultural aspects, and other aspects besides the two mentioned above, though, it is highly unlikely practical to preserve these areas strictly in their natural state.