Issue69 (模考13) 请大家拍拍 （写的都还没有被看过呢好心人给看看）

pinuoUID: 2328081

Partially agree:
1.      科学家希望有独立的思想，用研究来揭示事实的真相。而政府考虑的更多的是各种应用给社会带来的影响。在政府和科研的关系上，我认为，政府应该给于科学研究以足够的自由，但是当研究成果的预测应用会危害社会和人民的利益时，政府应当给于限制。
2.         政府应该少管
(1)     Generally speaking, government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development.
(a)      Little relative knowledge.政治家不是科学家，政府本身对科学界并不熟悉，如果对科学研究限制过多就会影响科学的发展
(b)     Would be inclined to be in support what they regard worthwhile and would benefit the people immediately政府对科学界的限制也往往是从本身的利益出发。比如：提倡那些可以带来效益的研究，而那些基础研究却被忽视，从而形成科学界的发展不平衡。
(2)     Too much restriction would be detrimental to the development of scientific research. (A telling example of the inherent danger of official’s restriction of the scientific research involves the attempts of Soviet during 1920s’ to not only control the directions and goals of researches but the outcome and results of the research as well—for the purpose of the general welfare of the people. Some scientists even disappeared later because of their threats to the safety and stability of the nation. Not surprisingly, during this period of time, no significant discovery or invention occurred.
3.      However, providing absolute freedom might cause other problems of equal graveness. (Some immoral researches or ones in threats of the peace, safety and stability of the society) 如说：克隆的研究带来了人们的伦理观念的混乱
        核武器的研究使世界面临灭亡的危险这些是人们提出了要限制科学研究的要求，但是科学本身并没有错误，错误的是人类怎么去应用。所以政府更应该限制的是科学成果的应用，而不是科学研究本身

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
WORDS: 587          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2007-9-5 18:23:28

What is the role of government on scientific research and development? Some people may think of the work of society, of course including scientific research, should be put under the direction of government policy or regulation, while there are all also some people, especially the researcher involved in these research, recommend that government's restrictions should be as few as possible, just as the author mentioned. I believe, there aresome circumstance in which govenment should place some regulation, and in most occation government should reduce its interference in scientific research.

The first reason I believe government present free research atmosphere to the research lies in the potiential harm the government's regulations inflicted on the research worlk . First, few will argue that the scientific research work are usually a little advanced than the current requirement, and  the research's ideas are sometimes far beyond our imagination which in the eyes of common are more like a fantacy rather a serious scientific research work, even be regarded as ridiculous imagination. History are repleted with such examples, the idea that send human people to the universe was thought to be crazy fantacy. Government official, which generally share the same view with the common people rather than the professional scientists because of their professional and educational background, can hardly understand this ideas. And  it will be even harder for them to approve fund, which they may think to invest in some practically useful items such as build a high building, or buy several new weapons  and the like, to risk on these strange ideas of crazy scientists. Second, it will take relively long time to see the effects of such research works, though they can bring revolutional influence on human's life and work. The government, which supposed to do some pragmatic things, generally cannot afford such a long time. They will prefer some items which can bring rewards in a short time, even though such rewards perhaps are smaller compared with the those the scientists anticipated from their research works. Thus, the advanced and potentially have revolutionary influence research works will not be adoted according to the standards of government.

The second reason I think government will serve as an intriment rather than an aid to the research work has to do with their attitudes towards some basic and fundamental researchs. To witness this, you need look no further than he basic deciplines in the universities and colleges. Few and few students like to choose these subjects as their direction. This can reflect, to some degree, the attitude of the government towards these subjects. They prefer some engineer subjects, which can bring more direct benefits to the development of nation. The lack of fund, instruments and researchers has make the research work in these areas--such as mathematics, theory physics and the like--stop proceeding. The ignoring of these basic research work, which serve as a tool or assistance to the other research, directly affect the research in the other fields which seems can bring benefits in a short time.

In sum, the scientific research works, which has its inherent characters, make them a special profession in the society. Free research atmosphere is important--and, perhaps, essenctial--to whether they can develop effectively and bring benefits to the peope at best advantage. The Soviet's heavy-handed on the socientific research work in 1930s served as a lesson for all the nation, demonstrated the potential harm of govenment interference in research work, though we believe the regualtions on some controversial subject, such as human clone and chemical weapon, is necessary.

pinuoUID: 2328081

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

WORDS: 739          MODIFIED

What is the role of government on scientific research and development? Some people assert of the work of society, of course including scientific research, should be put under the direction of government policy or regulation, while there are all also some people, especially the researcher involved in these research, recommend that government's restrictions should be as few as possible, just as the author mentioned. I believe, there are some circumstances in which government should place some regulation, and in most cases government should reduce its interference in scientific research.

The first reason I believe government present free research atmosphere to the research lies in the potential harm the government's regulations inflicted on the research works. First, few will argue that the scientific research work are usually a little advanced than the current requirement, and  the research's ideas are sometimes far beyond our imagination, which in the eyes of common people are more like a fantasy rather a serious scientific research work, even be regarded as ridiculous imagination. History are replete with such examples, Copernicus’ discovery that sun is the center of universe instead of the earth which was suppressed and not accepted by his contemporaries; The idea that one day human can fly on the sky like birds was criticized as unreasonable; the idea that send human people to the universe was thought to be crazy fantasy. Government official, who generally share the same view with the common people rather than the professional scientists because of their professional and educational background, can hardly understand this ideas. And it will be even harder for them to approve fund, which they may think to be used to invest in some practically useful items such as build a high building, or buy several new weapons and the like, to risk on these strange ideas of crazy scientists. Second, it will take relatively long time to see the effects of such research works, though they can bring revolutionary influence on human's life and work. The government, which supposed to do some pragmatic things, generally cannot afford such a long time. They will prefer some items which can bring rewards in a short time, even though such rewards perhaps are smaller compared with those the scientists anticipated from their research works. Thus, the advanced research works will not be adopted according to the standards of government.

The second reason I think government will serve as an impediment rather than an aid to the research work has to do with their attitudes towards some basic and fundamental researches. To witness this, you need look no further than he basic disciplines in the universities and colleges. Few and few students like to choose these subjects as their direction. This can reflect, to some degree, the attitude of the government towards these subjects. They prefer some engineer subjects, which can bring more direct benefits to the development of nation. The lack of fund, instruments and researchers has make the research work in these areas--such as mathematics, theory physics and the like--stop proceeding. The ignoring of these basic research work, which serve as a tool or assistance to the other research, directly affect the research in the other fields which seems can bring benefits in a short time.

Nevertheless, government’s regulations can show their advantage in the case of some research issue which will bring disastrous consequence if left unaddressed. One paradigmatic example in the current world is human clone, which has sparked a debate around the world. It is believed to be morally and ethically wrong thing to clone humans, even though technology is constantly advancing, due to the killing of human embryos, the unsafe process of cloning, and the resulting consequences of having deformed clones. Therefore the many governments have explicitly banned the human clone in their laws. The similar example is vast destruction weapon, including the nuclear weapon, between its potential threats to the world.

In sum, the scientific research works, which has its inherent characters, make them a special profession in the society. Free research atmosphere is important--and, perhaps, essential--to whether they can develop effectively and bring benefits to the people at best advantage. The Soviet's heavy-handed on the scientific research work in 1930s served as a lesson for all the nations, demonstrated the potential harm of government interference in research work, though we believe the regulations on some controversial subject, such as human clone and chemical weapon, is necessary.

y10kUID: 131092

提点个人看法

写得很长, 但是句子不通顺, 经常一个长句看下来不知道什么意思

第一第二两个重要段落的第一个中心句就看得我一头雾水

第三段的第一句也很拗口............虽然我总算看懂你说什么...........

建议楼主适当修改修改, 句子不是越长越好

xinli_wUID: 2318820

看起来很吃力啊~
让我开始怀疑自己的能力

pinuoUID: 2328081

原帖由 y10k 于 2007-9-6 01:00 发表
提点个人看法

写得很长, 但是句子不通顺, 经常一个长句看下来不知道什么意思

谢谢斑竹指点，我的作文都是几乎没有被看过的。所以有些问题自己也没有发现。
明天就考了，没有办法细细的去改了，只是我会注意你的建议就是尽量写的短一些，问题应该会相应（只是可能）的少一些。
谢谢你，提高语言能力只能等考试后了，呵呵。