argument 2 第一篇习作尽量批

shanxinhpUID: 2311857

Argument2【0806G奋斗小组】作业七


Argument2:The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres.

"Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting."

提纲:1,D,B两地不具有可比性
       2,B地的房价上涨是由于其他原因
       3,D地的房价是否上涨由本地的经济,环境等条件决定



The In this argument, the arguer  recommends that D' s homeowners should adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting to have property rising . This recommendation is based on the observation that nearby B community followed the similar restriction 7 years ago and therefore there property rise. In several aspects, however, the evidence lends little credible support for the argument.

A threshold assumption upon which the recommendation relies is that D is analogous to B in all aspects , however he does not provide any evidence that their circumstance are indeed comparable , as we know the different setting between D and B may help to bring about a different result to D . The It is true that both community need to lay out yards, the but there exist fundamental difference: the comparing with B, the home- buyers in D the may find the consist exterior the appearance a distasteful feature the in which the case adopting the these restriction the might even the decrease the value of D's property value. Without accounting for these and other possible dissimilaritily to assume follow this restriction which will bring about rising property value in D as same as B is unreasonable.

Even assuming that D is almost similar to B, the assumption that property value of B rising depend on this course of action is unreasonable. The During the  past time  in which  it is  entirely possible  that one  or more  other factors  responsible for  the increase, the perhaps more  and more people flows out to go into B as well as rapid economic development can also lead to the same result , or perhaps the supply of housing has decrease may have the same function .

Even assuming that B’s rising property values are attributable to the implement of these restriction , this case has been past 7 years ,however ,this is not necessarily so .Perhaps regional culture ,economic shifted during the last 7years ,and may arrange their own yard and panting is very popularity . Since the argument fails to rule out other alternative explanation for willingness of home-buyers, the argument’s conclusion is unwarranted.

In sum, the argument is unpersuasive as it stands, to strengthen it the argument’s proponent must provide evidence that other factors affecting home prices in the two area are similar .What is more the leader should make a wide and deep investigate of home-buyers, for whose intention is the final crucial factor, however before any final decision are made about the restriction should evaluate all possible alternatives and causes for price increase of house in B.


共446字.

顺便问一下大家的第一篇作文都是怎么写的?用了多长时间?
我写了5个小时,是不是最长的?