Issue31【0806G-Sunbird小组】第1次作业

MusingUID: 2362177

第一次写  猛批吧!!!!


Is it a significant investment that apply to a research which even turn out to be controversical ? The statement raises a variety of issues about society,scientsis and philosophy. On balance,however,i fundamantlly agree with the assertion that we need support invest more
research no matter what the results are.

As i see it , there are two main fundamantal argument for fighting the above ideas . The first has to do with the importance of one
research . The implicit thoughts behind many people's statement seem to be that research is less important than food,clothing and
house which are more closer to themself benefits.That the latter needs are more fundamantal is indisputable . Above all, what a person would prefer investing a research to a house ? According to this argument , we humans might tempting to seek our more immedicte
needs instead of investing research .

The second has to do with the idea that the exorbitant amount of money ,on which spend research even the results are controversial , should have been dealed with the extremely urgent society's problems such as poverty,education or medical . To some extends ,it seems logical .

On the other hand are also two compelling argument that research are desirable . First of all , considering the rapid development of
modern society , i  have to emphsis that he research is indispensable . As one , also only one , tool to explore the unknown terrtory ,
increasingly important role plays research which brings to our enduring questions true answers and solutions . Besides , the obvious
importance of technology to human cultural and social evolution has led some sociologists to view research a basic principle of society change . Accordingly , the society would have given rise to more problems had we humans ignored the research .

The second argument , and that i find most compelling , is a appeal to logical over emotion . The research which the reuslt is
controversial doesn't mean a completely failure . To the contrary , new ideas sometimes are born when we view the failure from a new angle . Failure serves another usefull purpose , they tell us when to change direction . When things are going smoothly , we generally don't think about them . For example , you are probably not thinking about your elbows , that's because everything is fine with them . But if you were break it , you would immedicately notice all of the things you could no longer to do . We learn by trial and error , not
by trial and rightness . If we did things correctly everytime , we would never have to change direction -- we'd just continue the current course and end up with more of the same . In one word , we learn by our failures , a person's errors are the that lead him to think
something different .

In sum the issue of investing a controversial research is a complex one , requiring a subjective choice between society 's more
immediate problems and more profound development . Thus , there are no easy or certain answers . Yet i make approvel with this
claim when it comes to the direction of future advancement . In the final analysis , we cannot neglect that some researchs are
completely meaningless . In this case , the investor must be careful before investing .