issue187 It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new id

sdc1980818UID: 123625

issue187"It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice."

The writer of the issue connotates an ironic phenomenon: though innovation is required in our era and eulogized by most people, application of it is clannished vehemently because of the fear of failure and the possibility of obtained possession and tradition impairing. The author grasps the paradox psychology of most people and pertinently reveals a universal mentality.

As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even a revolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, the ameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. Following with innovation of the second industrial revolution, great changes took place and immediately a renewed world unfolded before us with the application of its fruits. Seeing unimaginable  profits and the magic power, who (including the society and government) can suppress their agitating desire to restrict development of innovation?

Unfortunately, innovation doesn't always follow the people's will and always acts like an uncontroled horse running in the plain. Worrying about the side-effect, people have to hold their desire back but admire those who are brave enough to taste crabs for the first time.  Not everyone possesses the same courage as Biil Gate's, who dare invest on a fresh field and give up the chance of studying in Harvard University, which is the dream of most aggressive young people. Often, pondering what they have already possessed with what they might get from innovation, most people prefer the former to the latter, even content to sacrifice the latter to ensure the integer of the former. For example, a department may enroll those who are not very deft in the work but behave complaisant before higher-ups and deny to those who stick to their innovational opinion obstinately. After all, it is  required more to cooperate with others harmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a new law according to individual penchant, in any company  and corporation.

Maybe, some one argues that, how to cultivate innovation if  personality should abdicate to interests of collective? Does the statement above alludes that employees should do nothing but keep silent and follow what the higher-ups dictated, strangling their inspiration to accord to the criterion today? No doubt, such supposition is rediculous. I mean that employees should try to approach their original though to tenet of the collective, not attempt to disobey the existed norm, respect suggestion and supposition of others and circumspect the innovation and then discuss with all the members in the company. That is, responsibility should be taken before the innovation is applied to practice.

Of course, many people don't have the ability that controling their compulsion of carrying their innovation into application. It doesn't lack of people who dare not apply innovation, and people who hold innovational thought are not scarc either, however, those who possess both of the two abilities and are lucky enough to encounter a proper opportunity to release their innovation is very few. The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovation is the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas are here and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application is too little to be heard.

sdc1980818UID: 123625

所用到的GRE词汇：

ironic(讽刺的，比较常用),
eulogize（赞扬，acclaim, appraise, applaud）,
clannish(排斥，还有相关的eliminate(淘汰)，obliterate(删除)),
vehement（猛烈的，violently,fiercely,凑凑字数还是挺管用的 ）,
grasp（紧紧握住，比用hold形象）,
pertinent（贴切的relevant（相关的），pertinent用起来程度更深一些）,
agitate（激起，掀起，使……不安，蠢蠢欲动，与desire可进行搭配使用）,
transition（过渡阶段，从旧到新，如文中的工业革命到其应用的一段日子里）
rediculous, （可笑的，自娱自乐，自己打倒自己可能derivate的一个错误观点，可能程度太深了不过比absurd似乎还是要好点。）
ponder, （权衡比较）
cultivate, （培养，耕作，一般可用于教育方面，说培养学生）
strangle,（扼杀，对思想，灵感，创新，比较常用，还用程度浅一点的shackle,fetter）
approach, (抵达，到达，文中：使……符合一至)
norm, scarce（文中拼写有误）,
tenet,encounter, combination Bill Gate(好象是这样的吧，文中似乎又犯了拼写错误)。

用词分析以及文中还有的错误，希望大家能帮忙指正一下，Thank you.

gteryyUID: 114434

作者的用词和句式都很有深度，只是我不太明白到底说了什么看法？是赞成、反对、还是折中？能用中文解释一下吗？做阅读做得头都大了。。。太差劲
另：“吃螃蟹”不知道英文中是不是仍然用这个说法表示尝新的人。呵呵，不过你确实表达的不错，美国人可以考虑收入短语库：)

sdc1980818UID: 123625

"It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice."

我想表达的是一种ironic: 人们似乎是很欢迎创新的，在表层上是愿意接受创新，而实际上是排斥的。
首段指出，开篇点题。
从心理的角度进行分析为什么人们accept创新（As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even a revolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, the ameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. ）
从实际功利上来阐述人们又总是排斥创新（it is required more to cooperate with others harmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a new law according to individual penchant, in any company and corporation。）
最后进一步分析，人们不能很好accept创新的原因（The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovation is the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas are here and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application is too little to be heard.）

imongUID: 140258

提醒注意的是，文中数处用词显得造作，或者有错误。
例如 paradox psychology (paradoxical?) ameliorated life (ameliorate修饰得不好) 请在阅读的时候给予足够的注意。
句式的使用，除去一些失误，还是相当成功的。结构也相当不错。如果用词得到改善，应该是5.5到6的范文作品。