寄托天下
查看: 960|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] ISSUE8【再战GRE小组】第一次作业by wanglinnk [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
79
注册时间
2007-11-22
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-12-11 12:50:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Issue 8 (大家多多指教!感激不尽!)


题目:ISSUE8 - "It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public."


First, let’s give the definition of the word "information". It indicates the facts told, discovered about something which of course not include the secret of the nation and won't interfere the country's stabilization. For example, the government’s recent plan and action, the economic situation of the country, the policy to agriculture, etc. Based on this limitation, all the information should be told to the public; no matter it is good or bad.

People have the right to know their government's activities. Every democratic government should respect this right and give their people sufficient freedom to get the information. So that, not only will people know what has happened, but also they will help the government make correct decision. Nowadays, many local governments in China carry out the policy called “sunshine project” which is aiming at making the information of the governments clear to the public. Some places even publicize the mayor’s office telephone number in order to listen to the residents’ recommendations. This policy satisfies people because they know the use of their tax, can response problems in time, and see the quick solution.

If the political leaders withhold information, once people know the fact they may feel being fooled. It is said that “the water can take the boat but also can capsize the boat”. This proverb means if the government causes the people's dissatisfaction, people's power is so huge that it will collapse their domination. Perhaps the reality is not so serious as the proverb said, but withholding information does bring detriment to society. For example, the first SARS patient appeared in Guangdong province of China in 2003 and the epidemic spread fast. The political leaders in Guangdong concealed the epidemic from people and the nation. As a result, the epidemic hasn’t been controlled in time so that it developed into a national scale epidemic. SARS not only made many people lose their lives or their family members, but also led to a serious economic loss, etc. This example shows us the serious consequence of concealing information from public.

Even if the information sometimes may cause people's fear and convulsion, political leaders shouldn't withhold it from public. They can explain to and comfort the public. As long as the method of dealing with the problems is suitable, the upset of the public can be avoided.                                                                        

In sum, political leaders shouldn’t withhold information from public. In order to establish a democratic and harmonious society, the governors have to listen to the opinion of public.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
109
注册时间
2007-8-3
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2007-12-12 00:51:38 |只看该作者
First, let’s give the definition of the word "information". (It indicates the facts told, discovered about something which of course not include the secret of the nation and won't interfere the country's stabilization. For example, the government’s recent plan and action, the economic situation of the country, the policy to agriculture, etc. )It should be referred to as facts that will not endanger national security or harm social stabilization, for example, the government’s recent policy to agriculture, the economic situation of the country, etc. Based on this limitation, all the information should be told to the public; no matter it is good or bad.

People have
(the) right to know their government's activitieswhat is going on in their country. Every democratic government should respect this right and give their people sufficient freedom to get the information. (So that)If so, not only will people know what has happened, but also they will help the government make correct decision. Nowadays, many local governments in China (carry out)are carrying out the policy called “sunshine project”, which is aiming at making the information of the governments (clear)transparent to the public. Some (places) local authorities even publicize the mayor’s office telephone number in order to listen to (the residents’ recommendations) mass people’s voices.这个例子不典型,美国所有government 的办公室电话都是公开的 This policy satisfies people because they know the use of their tax, can response problems in time, and see the quick solution. This policy satisfies people because they know how their taxes were used, and they can reflect problems in time, expecting quick solutions.

If the political leaders withhold information, once people know the fact they may feel being fooled. It is said that “the water can take the boat but also can capsize the boat”. This proverb means if the government causes the people's dissatisfaction, people's power is so huge that it will collapse their domination. Perhaps the reality is not so serious as the proverb said, but withholding information does bring detriment to society. For example, the first SARS patient appeared in Guangdong province of China in 2003 and the epidemic spread fast. The political leaders in Guangdong concealed the epidemic from people and the nation. As a result, the epidemic hasn’t been controlled in time so that it developed into a national scale epidemic. SARS not only made many people lose their lives or their family members, but also led to a serious economic loss, etc. This example shows us the serious consequence of concealing information from public.
这段没时间改了,要睡觉了,留给别人改吧。感觉可以从“with hold information 有时是为了避免公众惊慌,但是这样可能会起到反作用”这点来说,你后面的内容偏离这段起始句,还不如把起始句改了。SARS太老了

Even if the information sometimes may cause people's fear and convulsion, political leaders shouldn't withhold it from public. They can explain to and comfort the public. As long as the method of dealing with the problems is suitable, the upset of the public can be avoided.
这段薄弱了点,最好加点例子什么的,其实可以做个让步,有关国家安全等信息不能透露,但这样的话,你首尾两段还要改。                                                                       

In sum, political leaders shouldn’t withhold information from public. In order to establish a democratic and harmonious society, the governors have to listen to the opinion of public.
这两句之间没有衔接,可以这样说 In sum, political leaders shouldn’t withhold information from public. Contrarily, in order to establish a democratic and harmonious society, the governors should publicize the real-time information to the public. Only in this way could the government hear people’s opinion in to and make sensible decision.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
79
注册时间
2007-11-22
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2007-12-12 22:14:49 |只看该作者

回复 #2 ustcroad 的帖子

不尽感激!

弱问一句:“hear people's opinion in to"好像没hear in to这个用法啊?解释一下嘿嘿

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE8【再战GRE小组】第一次作业by wanglinnk [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE8【再战GRE小组】第一次作业by wanglinnk
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-778335-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部