argument174 第6次作业

zyb_iceUID: 2417356

While the reasons given by the author appears to support the results that morale will be improved and alumni will continually support the college by keeping the college all--female, but one must considerate the causal relation and whether the decision is reasonable.

Primarily, the fact that eighty percent of the students wanted the school to remain all female cannot indicates the all--female educational system will improve morale among students. On the one hand, we should think of the truth of the ideas given by the female students, they may lie for sly, which they think learning around a number of male is evil; at same time, the all--female college have existed for hundreds of years, they may become the focus of attention for they desirously break the traditional educational system. On the other hand, the thinking of the students who will be freshmen in the student also is important, because their will be the new body of school life as well as their points and life style directly impact the educational circumstance. What is more, necessity of considerate the importance of educational fundament and instructional quality of a college play in an institution of learning. Educational fundament affect resources applied to the students and faculties; the knowledge of the teachers and whether their take a responsibility and exercise initiative in a way that promotes the development of all the students.

The fact that alumni oppose coeducation do not manifest they will stop supporting the college financially. As we all known, whether a alumni supporting his almamater do not depends upon the gender of the students and the number of the students, but on their felling to the institution which have cultivated them and make them intelligent. Because all the alumni are female and perhaps they think the all--female college system serve to developing psychology and attaining knowledge for they was instructed by this system and they have shaped a strong way of thinking that female should be taught together. Moreover, what are the ideas of other alumni? Do they agree with coeducation? Are they will no longer insist the college financially? We are not informed about such questions.

At last, the argument appears to neglect the viewpoints the faculty, which are the managers and administrators of the college. To the extent that the faculty regard the coeducation as more properly and their main ideas be not accepted, they may present this complaint through action and working sooner or later. For example, a teacher may late for class frequently and a life guide may not plan the living carefully, As a result, this may hamper the improvement of morale among students.

Thus, for the purpose of improve morale among students and gain financial support from alumni, it is necessary recognize more factors and more people' ideas is indispensable for making decision for the development of a college, the article fails to do so!