寄托天下
查看: 1474|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] issue4 (AWER) [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
112
注册时间
2007-11-21
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-12-14 11:54:46 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

4. "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

    The speaker asserts that if a field is undergoing a dramatic promotion, the knowledge and experience brought to that field of study by outsiders is indispensable. In my opinion, I generally agree with the speaker on the basic notion that the breakthrough in a scientific field need not only the professional knowledge, but other experience as well.

    There is no denying that we human beings have created a great sums of innovations and technologies that now render our life more convenient and comfortable. Information technology enable us to communicate with each other more easily, multimedia technology makes our life more colorful and interesting, modern transportation system allows us to travel around the world in just several hours and medical science make it possible for us to live longer and lead a more healthy life. I think every one could feel the great contributions that science study brings us, but how many of us have considered the question that what makes the research advance?

    To begin with, I would like to take the biological science for example. As we all know, the biological science is one of the most important sciences in 21th century. So many countries around the world set aside a huge amount of fund to this field in order to possess such a cut-edge science and technology. And most experts in biological field do their utmost to discover essential theories and principles. Do you know? The Nobel Prize winners of physiological and medical science over the recent decades were not engaged in this field, most of whom came from physical, chemical, computer science etc. They claimed that what they had learned and researched before made great contributions to their present achievements.

    In addition, this assertion is also equally correct in the field of business. If a student who graduated from a commercial college wants to have a management job in a company, he is surely be refused by the employers due to he is devoid of relevant experience. Those freshmen can't bring any benefit to company except passion of work. The vice-president of Google Kaifu Li is a proof that could give the perfectible illustration. When he graduated from Columbia University, he became a teacher of computer programme who was assigned to teach several extraordinary intelligent students. Afterwards, he worked in Apple Company, Microsoft. Depending on such abundant experience, he becomes the vice-president of Google now. Let's imagine that if Li was desirable to find a leader job as other peers and didn't experience so much obstacle and failure, how is he able to fulfill present success?

    To sum up, I'm firmly convinced that great advancement in a field also need the support from other fields. On no acount can a person who merely devotes himself to just one field achieve great success or discovery. Consequently, the development of us mankind is based on the communication of experts from different fields. Only intertwining the various fields into an organic integration can lead us into a brand new scientific era.

0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
319
注册时间
2007-4-25
精华
0
帖子
11
沙发
发表于 2007-12-19 12:45:38 |只看该作者

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
205
注册时间
2007-3-6
精华
0
帖子
1
板凳
发表于 2007-12-19 23:36:09 |只看该作者

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
2802
注册时间
2007-10-22
精华
0
帖子
81
地板
发表于 2008-1-4 13:51:45 |只看该作者
issue4."No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

    The speaker asserts that if a field is undergoing a dramatic promotion, the knowledge and experience brought to that field of study by outsiders is indispensable. In my opinion, I generally agree with the speaker on the basic notion that the breakthrough in a scientific field need not only the professional knowledge, but other experience as well.
    There is no denying that we human beings have created a great sums of innovations and technologies that now render our life more convenient and comfortable. Information technology enable us to communicate with each other more easily, multimedia technology makes our life more colorful and interesting, modern transportation system allows us to travel around the world in just several hours and medical science make it possible for us to live longer and lead a more healthy life. I think every one could feel the great contributions that science study brings us, but how many of us have considered the question that what makes the research advance?[这一段是否与第一自然段调换位置,这里看起来象序言,第一自然段+下面的内容=整体.呵呵,纯个人观点]
    To begin with, I would like to take the biological science for example. As we all know, the biological science is one of the most important sciences in 21th century. So many countries around the world set aside a huge amount of fund to this field in order to possess such a cut-edge science and technology. And most experts in biological field do their utmost to discover essential theories and principles. Do you know? The Nobel Prize winners of physiological and medical science over the recent decades were not engaged in this field, most of whom came from physical, chemical, computer science etc. They claimed that what they had learned and researched before made great contributions to their present achievements.[继续啊~~outsiders bring 还没有看到...]
    In addition, this assertion is also equally correct in the field of business. If a student who graduated from a commercial college wants to have a management job in a company, he is surely be refused by the employers due to he is devoid of relevant experience. Those freshmen can't bring any benefit to company except passion of work. The vice-president of Google— Kaifu Li is a proof that could give the perfectible illustration. When he graduated from Columbia University, he became a teacher of computer programme who was assigned to teach several extraordinary intelligent students. Afterwards, he worked in Apple Company, Microsoft. Depending on such abundant experience, he becomes the vice-president of Google now. Let's imagine that if Li was desirable to find a leader job as other peers and didn't experience so much obstacle and failure, how is he able to fulfill present success?[题目指field of study,用这个论点---field of business...合适吗?这里的例子--Kaifu Li 的经历能说明the field of business...吗?前者个体,后者集体呢!teacher of computer--Apple Company--Microsoft--Google,他还是在the field of computer内,并没有outsiders bring,只不过职务由teacher--vice-president of ...,也看不出他experience so much obstacle and failure;蛮好的,经验丰富在the field of computer,在国外teacher 的地位也不错呀]  
    To sum up, I'm firmly convinced that great advancement in a field also need the support from other fields. On no acount can a person who merely devotes himself to just one field achieve great success or discovery. Consequently[呵呵,太绝对了], the development of us[our] mankind is based on the communication of experts from different fields. Only intertwining the various fields into an organic integration can lead us into a brand new scientific era.

上述纯个人观点,仅供参考.呵呵,加油啊~~
陈星君

使用道具 举报

RE: issue4 (AWER) [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue4 (AWER)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-779792-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部