寄托天下
查看: 1071|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument51 [0806G-desperado小组]第四次作业by JENNY [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
810
注册时间
2005-10-19
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-12-14 12:08:37 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
------题目------
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
'Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment.'
------提纲------
结论:有肌肉损伤的患者应该在他们的治疗中使用抗生素.
驳斥点:1 研究问题: 忽略了研究中对照两组研究对象在其他方面的差异,关于患者的年龄,背景,身体状况是不是有可比性,如果一边是身强体壮的年轻人,一边是健康状况不好的老年人,研究不能说明问题
2 即使研究是在两组人情况基本相同的条件下进行的,也不一定是抗生素起了作用.医师的专长不同,治疗方法都可能对患者的康复时间造成影响.比如运动医学的专家可能比另一个综合医师更好的处理肌肉损伤的问题.另外,糖片也是有可能对肌肉类病症有影响.导致恢复减慢,甚至恶化伤情;
3 即使抗生素有作用,也不能建议所有被确诊为肌肉损伤的患者服用抗生素作为辅助治疗.1)不能因为只有一部分人可能感染就要全部人都应用抗生素.2)抗生素的副作用,比如过敏3)除了感染,疲劳也可能影响康复。
------正文------418 words
Although antibiotics seem take positive effect in the study, it cannot conclude that all patients with muscle strain should take antibiotics as part of treatment since the study itself is not as convincing as it states, and also other treatments and factors are not considered in the statement.

First of all, when we are informed that there are two groups of patients are participated in the study, the arguer fails to make clear the relevant information of these patients in each group, such as ages, health conditions and backgrounds. If the information in the two groups has great differences, then the result of study is doubt at best. For example, one group's patients are healthy athletes while the other group’s patients are poor-health-condition old ages, the recovery period of two groups would be not the similar even if both group do not give antibiotics.

Even assuming that the conditions of patients in two groups are nearly the same, the study amounts to scant evidence support that healing quickly in one group attributes to antibiotics. It is entirely possible that the doctor's treatment and expertise are all contribute to the healing time. Perhaps Dr. Newland is good at curing muscle strain than Dr. Alton because Dr. Newland is specializes in sports medicine and Dr. Alton is just a general physician. Additionally, it is possible that sugar pills have bad effect on patients so that patients who were given sugar pills recover from illness more slowly. Without giving rid of these factors, I cannot accept the author's viewpoint about antibiotics.

At last, even if antibiotics play a vital role in helping heal quickly, it need not to suggest every patient who are diagnosed with muscle strain take antibiotics as part of their treatment. First, not all patients with muscle strain will have secondary infection, so not all patients need to take antibiotics. Second, in addition to infections, other factors may prevent patients from healing quickly. For instance, over tired, malnutrition and so on. In these cases, good rest and nutrition are better than antibiotics for patients. Third, antibiotics might have side effect to patients, such as allergy. Thus, antibiotics is possible not suitable for all patients.

In all, the argument based on a study could provide information for muscle strain healing. Before conclusion about what kind of people should take antibiotics, a more complete understanding and evidence of the antibiotics and the study are needed. After all, a mistake use of antibiotics could be dangerous for patients.

这篇文章的理解和分析不比一篇issue来的轻松,我丝毫不敢怠慢的把提纲写的非常详细.
另外,我开始置疑千篇一律的模板开头和结尾,所以按照ets6分范文炮制了开头和结尾.希望你们也能就开头和结尾提提意见.
谢谢!


[ 本帖最后由 gaojiehaha 于 2007-12-14 12:10 编辑 ]
人生如棋,落子不悔!
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
296
注册时间
2007-11-17
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2007-12-14 20:18:27 |只看该作者
我觉得开头这样很棒!但是结尾概括性还不够 有点散 最好有一句话能把一大片的东西收到一点上
得之坦然,失之淡然,争其必然,顺其自然

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
810
注册时间
2005-10-19
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2007-12-14 23:26:12 |只看该作者
thanks for little lovely green stone:loveliness:
人生如棋,落子不悔!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
487
注册时间
2006-7-10
精华
0
帖子
2
地板
发表于 2007-12-15 01:30:54 |只看该作者

Although antibiotics seemtotake positive effect in the study, it cannot conclude that all patients with muscle strain should take antibiotics as part of treatment since the study itself is not as convincing as it states, and also other treatments and factors are not considered in the statement.很简洁,感觉比北美范文式的开头好多了,向你学习

First of all, when we are informed that there are two groups of patients are participated in the study, the arguer fails to
make clear the relevant information of these patients in each group, such as ages, health conditions and backgrounds. If the information in the two groups has great differences, then the result of study is doubt at best. For example, one group's patients are healthy athletes while the other group’s patients are poor-health-condition old ages, the recovery period of two groups would be not the similar even if both group do not give antibiotics.

Even assuming that the conditions of patients in two groups are nearly the same, the study amounts to scant evidence support that healing quickly in one group attributes to antibiotics. It is entirely possible that the doctor's treatment and expertise are all contribute to the healing time. Perhaps Dr. Newland is good at curing muscle strain than Dr. Alton because Dr. Newland is specializes in sports medicine and Dr. Alton is just a general physician. Additionally, it is possible that sugar pills have bad effect on patients so that patients who were given sugar pills recover from illness more slowly. Without giving rid of these factors, I cannot accept the author's viewpoint about antibiotics.

At last, even if antibiotics play a vital role in helping heal quickly, it need not to suggest every patient who are diagnosed with muscle strain take antibiotics as part of their treatment. First, not all patients with muscle strain will have secondary infection, so not all patients need to take antibiotics. Second, in addition to infections, other factors may prevent patients from healing quickly. For instance, over tired, malnutrition and so on. In these cases, good rest and nutrition are better than antibiotics for patients. Third, antibiotics might have side effect to patients, such as allergy. Thus, antibiotics is possible(
possibly) not suitable for all patients.

In all, the argument based on a study could provide information for muscle strain healing. Before conclusion about what kind of people should take antibiotics, a more complete understanding and evidence of the antibiotics and the study are needed.
After all, a mistake use of antibiotics could be dangerous for patients.(这句我喜欢)

我觉得这篇文章写得很好,不愧是研究了官方范文的结果。条理很清晰,开头就给你耳目一新的感觉,简洁直接,结尾也很干脆,最后一句更是有力度。可能还需改进的就是错误分析,分析可以稍微深入些,不是简单的列可能性。这也是我在学习的。向你学习,研究官方范文,总结自己的argu模板。
还有,总体感觉你的argu进步更大。呵呵

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument51 [0806G-desperado小组]第四次作业by JENNY [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument51 [0806G-desperado小组]第四次作业by JENNY
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-779796-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部