寄托天下
查看: 1092|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue141 [0806G-desperado小组]第八次作业byJENNY [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
810
注册时间
2005-10-19
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-12-19 07:37:39 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
------题目------
Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity.
------提纲------
是个性还是遵循传统能获得经济成功,这是个case by case的问题,在有些领域,需要个性,而有些领域需要遵循传统.
1在高新技术产业,或者投资业,个性对经济成功更重要.投资比如房地产.高新技术比如微软.
2在一些传统领域,或一些发展成熟的领域,遵循传统的人经济更成功
------正文------
Which quality--individuality or conformity--is more important in promoting personal economic success in this era? In my opinion, this is a case by case issue. While individualists are more inclined to win in some risk investment fields, high-tech industries, and the like, conformists are more inclined to win in traditional service industries and developed fields.

As to risk investment fields, people who always go ahead of other peers on capturing investment oppotunities will have economic success. And this character requires people have independent thoughts and actions. For instance, if conformatists realize the chance, due to the constant market demand and enhanced supplies, the chance which is benefit to individualists can mostly cause failture to conformists. Take real estate as an example, most popular land tends to be overprices, and in the long run their values will come down. Thus, it is individualists always make use of their keen insights and unique actions to choose potential land, then achieve more economic success from their investment than conformists.

Regarding to high-tech industries, where innovation, creativity and unique approach are all crucial to gain success, individuals who take unique approaches tend to own initiative and defeat companions. Furthermore, there is no maneuver and no typical method to begin with in high-tech industies, people can only rely on their own thought and action. In this case, individualists are beneficial than conformists. For example, Bill Gates, founder of famous Microsoft Group, gain great economic success and surge from a myriads of high-tech industies due to that his distinctive concept and creativity.  

Although risk investment fields and high-tech fields choose individualists in economic success, however, conformitists are more favorable in traditional service industries and developed fields. Since some traditional service industries and developed fields, i.e. laws and accounting, accumulate many useful strategies and methods during long-term development, conformities who comply with and make use of these conventional practices and ways of alike in the past, are more easier to achieve economic success. Additionally, many systems and regulations are required in these traditional service industries and developed fields, such as official institutions, financial services, and so on. Conformists, rather than individualists, prefer to work more effectively within the constraints of established polices and regulations. According, economic success prefer to go with conformists. On contrary, individuals, who cannot tolerant regulations and traditions, are hardly to gain economic success in these realms.

In sum, either individuality or conformity is contributable to economic success. Nevertheless, personal economic success in realm, such as risk investment or high-tech fields, requires individuality, and personal economic success in traditional service fields and developed fields requires conformity.
人生如棋,落子不悔!
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
212
注册时间
2007-12-4
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2007-12-19 20:46:58 |只看该作者
这篇文章我挑不出什么问题来了,就你的框架来说,这样是可以的,虽然当argument来细究的话还是有一些逻辑上不是特别肯定的地方,但是issue本身就是自圆其说就可以了,所以也没有关系。而且实战的时候写的太复杂了更容易写错或者写不完,所以这一篇我提不出太多意见了。

PLUS: 今天我可能依然不能交作业,但你的我肯定会改,我先把我的提纲放在这儿,你帮我修改下也可以:

在追求经济利益的过程中,个性和服从都需要
1、        一方面,个性很重要,没有了创新精神他就很难取得成功。比尔盖茨,操作系统。
2、        另一方面,服从也很重要,要服从社会的大趋势,尊重他人的传统习惯。
3、        在现代社会,多数人过分强调个性,而不顾他人,这是不对地;同样,如果只与别人保持一致会让自己失去特定的价值,自我的实现变得困难。
4、        正确看待这两者的关系是,保持平衡,从实际出发
铅华落尽

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
810
注册时间
2005-10-19
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2007-12-21 05:09:03 |只看该作者
原帖由 hdofruc 于 2007-12-19 20:46 发表
这篇文章我挑不出什么问题来了,就你的框架来说,这样是可以的,虽然当argument来细究的话还是有一些逻辑上不是特别肯定的地方,但是issue本身就是自圆其说就可以了,所以也没有关系。而且实战的时候写的太复杂 ...


你的提纲越写越好了!
服从社会的大趋势,尊重他人的传统习惯--我觉得这个想法很好
最后的保持平衡的分析也很好

我的issue之路还有很长的路要走啊!:eek: :eek: :eek:

[ 本帖最后由 gaojiehaha 于 2007-12-21 05:16 编辑 ]
人生如棋,落子不悔!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
205
注册时间
2007-3-6
精华
0
帖子
1
地板
发表于 2007-12-27 23:34:38 |只看该作者

你们提纲有 疑义

personal economic !!!!!!!!你们提纲有点 off 了

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue141 [0806G-desperado小组]第八次作业byJENNY [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue141 [0806G-desperado小组]第八次作业byJENNY
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-781950-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部