- 最后登录
- 2009-6-27
- 在线时间
- 3 小时
- 寄托币
- 810
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-10-19
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 663
- UID
- 2149729
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 810
- 注册时间
- 2005-10-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
------题目------
Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity.
------提纲------
是个性还是遵循传统能获得经济成功,这是个case by case的问题,在有些领域,需要个性,而有些领域需要遵循传统.
1在高新技术产业,或者投资业,个性对经济成功更重要.投资比如房地产.高新技术比如微软.
2在一些传统领域,或一些发展成熟的领域,遵循传统的人经济更成功
------正文------
Which quality--individuality or conformity--is more important in promoting personal economic success in this era? In my opinion, this is a case by case issue. While individualists are more inclined to win in some risk investment fields, high-tech industries, and the like, conformists are more inclined to win in traditional service industries and developed fields.
As to risk investment fields, people who always go ahead of other peers on capturing investment oppotunities will have economic success. And this character requires people have independent thoughts and actions. For instance, if conformatists realize the chance, due to the constant market demand and enhanced supplies, the chance which is benefit to individualists can mostly cause failture to conformists. Take real estate as an example, most popular land tends to be overprices, and in the long run their values will come down. Thus, it is individualists always make use of their keen insights and unique actions to choose potential land, then achieve more economic success from their investment than conformists.
Regarding to high-tech industries, where innovation, creativity and unique approach are all crucial to gain success, individuals who take unique approaches tend to own initiative and defeat companions. Furthermore, there is no maneuver and no typical method to begin with in high-tech industies, people can only rely on their own thought and action. In this case, individualists are beneficial than conformists. For example, Bill Gates, founder of famous Microsoft Group, gain great economic success and surge from a myriads of high-tech industies due to that his distinctive concept and creativity.
Although risk investment fields and high-tech fields choose individualists in economic success, however, conformitists are more favorable in traditional service industries and developed fields. Since some traditional service industries and developed fields, i.e. laws and accounting, accumulate many useful strategies and methods during long-term development, conformities who comply with and make use of these conventional practices and ways of alike in the past, are more easier to achieve economic success. Additionally, many systems and regulations are required in these traditional service industries and developed fields, such as official institutions, financial services, and so on. Conformists, rather than individualists, prefer to work more effectively within the constraints of established polices and regulations. According, economic success prefer to go with conformists. On contrary, individuals, who cannot tolerant regulations and traditions, are hardly to gain economic success in these realms.
In sum, either individuality or conformity is contributable to economic success. Nevertheless, personal economic success in realm, such as risk investment or high-tech fields, requires individuality, and personal economic success in traditional service fields and developed fields requires conformity. |
|