寄托天下
查看: 1248|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] [GRE-AWER]小组 第二次作业issue 144 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
188
注册时间
2007-11-19
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-1-24 13:23:06 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
题目:ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
字数:500          用时:00:45:00        日期:2008-1-15 16:44:51
The speaker claims that not the critic but the artist gives society something of lasting value. About this issue is a complex onesince it seems involves a conflict between the major professional of artist and the critic .In my point of view ,the final judge should depend on a case-by-case analysis of the two kind of people.
An artist's inspiration and creative works reflects the whole development of history of human being. Those masterpieces represent the wonderful and different time. And these artistes do their best to keep the most valuable things in the world for us. For instance, if Vincent WilliamVan Gogh didn't paint the wonderful picture of sunflowers, no one would discover the really beauty of it; If Leonardo da Vinci didn't left us the artwork of smiling Mona Lisa, how can we find the most beauty in the world can though a gently smiling? If Mozart didn't compose that excellent music, then in the dark, we must have nothing to appease our soul. This function of the arts can be denoted as “expressionism”——the artist’s use of a medium to express unique passion and insight. Poets as Emily Dickinson and ThedoreRoethke, painters such as the American sea painter Winslom Homer, the black folk artist Horracepipkin, used the arts to express their deepest private feelings and their vision of the universe. Whatthe created were not works that expressed an official or institution point of view. They elevated the person to a level of all-consuming importance.
Admittedly, artists of course have their nonesuch places in the world of art. However, whether artist can get more acceptances by common people in sometimes depend on the critics.
Critic is the person who evaluate works of art, such as novels, films ,music, paintings,etc.The function of critic is can help us understand and interpret art; a critic who is familiar with a particular artist and his or her works might have certain insights about those works that layman could not do that. A critic can support feedback for artists, and constructive criticism, if taken to heart, can result in better work. However, sometimes the most people have the different opinion think about that the critic usually treat the artist not so kind and the artist can not have the just treatment, and the artist often have to wait so long time can get people’s honorment. May be the truly masterspieces usually must receive the test of time and the critic.
    Artists and critic can supplement each other, as time passes, the greatest art work are those which are created by artists and evaluated by critics which draw people's attention toward those artworks.

To sum up, no one can really depart the artist and the critics, becouse in the world, artist’s need critics find the true meaning in their works and in the mean time, critics need the artist’s works to help the word's development. In my point of view, artists and the critics all give the society lasting value.   
  
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
137
注册时间
2007-11-5
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2008-1-24 13:49:14 |只看该作者

回复 #1 一波疏影 的帖子

题目:ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

The speaker claims that not the critic but the artist gives society something of lasting value. About this issue is a complex one,since it seems involves a conflict between the major professional of artist and the critic .In my point of view ,the final judge should depend on a case-by-case analysis of the two--- kind of people.

An artist's inspiration and creative works reflects the whole development of history of human being. --society  Those masterpieces represent the wonderful and different time. And these artistes do their best to keep the most valuable things in the world for us. For instance, if Vincent WilliamVan Gogh didn't paint the wonderful picture of sunflowers, no one would discover the really beauty of it; If Leonardo da Vinci didn't left us the artwork of smiling Mona Lisa, how can we find the most beauty in the world can though a gently smiling? If Mozart didn't compose that excellent music, then in the dark, we must have nothing to appease our soul. This function of the arts can be denoted as “expressionism”——the artist’s use of a medium to express unique passion and insight. Poets as Emily Dickinson and ThedoreRoethke, painters such as the American sea painter Winslom Homer, the black folk artist Horracepipkin, used the arts to express their deepest private feelings and their vision of the universe. Whatthe created were not works that expressed an official or institution point of view. They elevated the person to a level of all-consuming importance.

Admittedly, artists of course have their nonesuch places in the world of art. However, whether artist can get more acceptances by common people in sometimes depend on the critics.

Critic is the person who evaluate works of art, such as novels, films ,music, paintings,etc.The function of critic is can help us understand and interpret art; a critic who is familiar with a particular artist and his or her works might have certain insights about those works that layman could not do that. A critic can support feedback for artists, and constructive criticism, if taken to heart, can result in better work. However, sometimes the most people have the different opinion think about that the critic usually treat the artist not so kind and the artist can not have the just treatment, and the artist often have to wait so long time can get people’s honorment. May be the truly masterspieces usually must receive the test of time and the critic.
这段黑体是否放到下段会更好?
而整个这大段,你是否想论述critic的作用,与你第二段相呼应?
如果是的话,可以展开多论述一些,,尤其和根第二段一样,用例子支撑你的论点。


Artists and critic can supplement each other, as time passes, the greatest art work are those which are created by artists and evaluated by critics which draw people's attention toward those artworks.
这段很重要,但是你论述的和单薄。两者相辅相成,缺一不可,共同促进society的发展。

To sum up, no one can really depart the artist and the critics, becouse in the world, artist’s need critics find the true meaning in their works and in the mean time, critics need the artist’s works to help the word's development. In my point of view, artists and the critics all give the society lasting value.

[ 本帖最后由 futuring 于 2008-1-24 14:02 编辑 ]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
188
注册时间
2007-11-19
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2008-1-24 14:32:32 |只看该作者
谢谢~~
就是不知道哪些critic 对社会起过作用啊,想了很久都没有想出来~
所以论述单薄~~

使用道具 举报

RE: [GRE-AWER]小组 第二次作业issue 144 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
[GRE-AWER]小组 第二次作业issue 144
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-793581-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部