寄托天下
查看: 876|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] [AERO小组第9次作业]ISSUE41 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1356
寄托币
28866
注册时间
2007-11-6
精华
29
帖子
930

Aries白羊座 荣誉版主 QQ联合登录 AW活动特殊奖 IBT Zeal IBT Smart

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-1-26 17:29:41 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
这是本人这辈子第一篇ISSUE 写的实在无奈了,如果说ARGU是难度是3-4的话 ISSUE绝对有10以上,哎。。。。。还有一个月!!!!

题目:ISSUE41 - "Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science."
字数:425          用时:01:04:23          日期:2008-1-26 17:15:40


   Does nonmainstream area will satisfy human research instead of role of utility of science in our society? I fundamentally agree with the speaker's assertion that nonmainstream academic course can afford some special notions or explanations for serving us to better understand our world around. Nevertheless, some nonmainstream areas have taken a inevitable negative impact upon us, such as with superstition activities prevailing, more and more people believe superstition that would predict the process or even consequence within the development of things.
  I concede that the speaker is on the correct ancient side of this controversial issue. After all, as a result of lacking fundament and supporting from science, those nonmainstream areas are certainly hard for prevailing in large-scale of our society. Although some nonmainstream areas experienced and existed for thousands year in human society, it is obviously that lacking evident utility to improve human to progress. Whereas with technology developed rapidly in our society, increasing achievements step in our world around, which vast majority of people will believe result and consequence of science rather than the superstition. For instance, in the past, a predictor said:" 1999 will be a catastrophe, for the reason is that it is a real doomsday." However, the fact actually proves that the specious assumption is wholly unpersuasive. Science is different from the superstition for the reason is that it can be illustrating phenomena by way of using argumentation or demonstration.
  Even if some phenomenon and requirements in our society cannot be proved by science, yet, we believe that with developing in science by our endeavor, those indecipherable series of problems will be solved by field of science.
  On the other hands, it will be expected that fewer and fewer people will believe nonmainstream areas in the future because of power of science strengthening due to human strived in science field. For example, science has addressed many problems and phenomenon which exists in our world around. Also it is successful to explain many of puzzles. In addition, science field has enlarged in other marginal academic field, such as psychology. Some people who have suffered from this typical disease all can consult to relative department. Obviously, those achievements certainly should be attributable to science's magnitude of contribution.
  In sum, it is very likely that people will never be able to arrive at the same conclusion on this controversial issue, due to their diverse experiences, and conflicting values. Nevertheless, public awareness of the various dimensions of the issue discussed in the above argument will certainly contribute to the thorough understanding of the problems.


[ 本帖最后由 saavedro 于 2008-1-26 17:32 编辑 ]
0 0

使用道具 举报

RE: [AERO小组第9次作业]ISSUE41 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
[AERO小组第9次作业]ISSUE41
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-794382-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部