argument2 生平第一次argument

huangli711UID: 2451421

TOPIC: ARGUMENT2 - The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deer haven Acres to all homeowners in Deer haven Acres.
"Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deer haven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting."




The letter from this committee of homeowners in Deer haven Acres encourage all homeowners to espouse their set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting, in order to raise property values of their houses, Because this kind of revolutionize had been successful to their neighbor community—Brookville community.  

First of all, the argument fails to take the varieties of kinds of markets, which might be effected by totally different factors in different percentage, into consideration, though they two located nearly, even connected with each other. As the Deer haven Acres and the Brookville community, which are both mentioned in the passage, the latter might be located in a touring city, where purchaser pay more attention on the views and the harmony between the house and surrounding  environment. So painting house and landscaping could triple the property’s value. Though the Deer haven Acres locates on not far, but an industry city, where few people mind whether the buildings are gorgeous or not but the quality would be considered firstly, the same control might not raise the value but the profit.

Secondly, even though the environment of the two communities are similar, no one single factor could be a enduring one in the market area, which always takes most significant part in the fast varying society. As the argument mentioned, seven years ago the restriction in Brookville community took a good result—average property value have tripled. In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and economic displacement, marketing is not what used to be seven years ago. Besides, the same house eager might turn their views of value of building from appearance to quality. As a result, same restriction that is discussion of landscape and which color is the most suitable, should be thought as an additional factor, which could not be realized to triple the houses’ average value.

Finally, the house owner, who wrote the letter, has neglected one necessary part of giving a advice, which is survey. For a well-considered conclusion, most of the idea not only from the owners but also from customers, should be taken into consideration. Thus, one conclusion could be convinced by most of others and suggest has the possible to take a work.

In sum, the evidence cited in this expert does not permit any reliability inference about communication between the restriction of landscape and improvement of property value. To better assess the study’s reliability I would need more information about the house marketplace and the consumption direction around 3-year period. To strengthen the argument the speaker should think about the simulation of varieties of markets and progress lasting long-term.



小女愚作，感谢修改:kiss: