issue4 [jet小组] 第七次作业

sendUID: 2200778

Issue4: No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to thatfield of study.

The development of every field is not far away from the solid fundamental of knowledge and constant innovation. Expertshave more advantages in promoting the development of their fields thanoutsiders. Thus, I disagree with the statement that no field of study canadvance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience tothat field of study.

First of all, the advancement of study inevery field needs to depend on a large and wide fundamental knowledge inspecific field. It goes saying that only someone is ready for success, he wouldsuccess. This saying also means if everyone wants to contribute to certainfield, he or she should have done a lot of preparation. If outsiders neverconcern one field and have no critical thoughts, is it possible they could bebeneficial to this field? For example, JULI could discover the new elementbecause she already studied it several years and did a large amount ofexperiment. On the contrary, as far as outsiders are concerned, they possiblegive some superficial suggestions. But without enough knowledge, are thesesuggestions useful?

Secondly, constant innovation is necessaryto development of study in every field. For example, some high-technologycompanies often spend a long period on researching a series of products. Thedevelopment of latter products often is based on former stereotype products. Asfor outsiders, they have no knowledge about this and it is hard for them totake up with the job relevant to the new-generation products. Another exampleis many scientific conferences. In such meetings, experts often put forwardmany instructive and innovative ideas and they are likely to communicate withone another in order to give some advice for the further improvement in theirfield. In this case, outsiders fail to be above experts and to play a key role.

Thirdly, if the development of one fieldneeds to associate with other field, expert in native field could learn morethan outsider. Because the expert know what is they need and how they learn.They could know to learn extensive knowledge selectively. In contrast, outsidercannot do that for their innocence of experts’ field, even if they own knowledgethat just expert need.

All in all, I think that with more and moreknowledge expert need to master and more and more complex field is, it isimpossible outsider could bring useful knowledge and experience to help thedevelopment of experts’ field.

[ 本帖最后由 send 于 2008-2-16 23:37 编辑 ]

O--honeyUID: 2452493

The development of every field is not far away from the solid fundamental of knowledge and constant innovation. Experts have more advantages in promoting the development of their fields thanoutsiders. Thus, I disagree with the statement that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.

First of all, the advancement of study in every field needs to depend on a large and wide fundamental knowledge in specific field. It goes saying that only someone is ready for success, he would success. This saying also means if everyone wants to contribute to certain field, he or she should have done a lot of preparation. If outsiders have never concern one field and had no critical thoughts, is it possible they could be beneficial to this field? For example, JULI (这里为什么是拼音呀？？）could discover the new element because she already studied it several years and did a large amount ofexperiment. On the contrary, as far as outsiders are concerned, they possible give some superficial suggestions. But without enough knowledge, are these suggestions useful?

Secondly, constant innovation is necessaryto development of study in every field. For example, some high-technological companies often spend a long period on researching a series of products. Thedevelopment of latter products often is based on former stereotype products. Asfor outsiders, they have no knowledge about this and it is hard for them to take up with the job relevant to the new-generation products. Another example is many scientific conferences. In such meetings, experts often put forward many instructive and innovative ideas and they are likely to communicate withone another in order to give some advice for the further improvement in their field. In this case,   
Thirdly, if the development of one field needs to associate with other field, expert in native field could learn more than outsider. Because the expert know what is they need and how they learn.They could know to learn extensive knowledge selectively. In contrast, outsidercannot do that for their innocence of experts’ field, even if they own knowledgethat just expert need.

All in all, I think that with more and moreknowledge expert need to master and more and more complex field is, it is impossible outsider could bring useful knowledge and experience to help thedevelopment of experts’ field.


为什么好多单词都是连在一起的呢？o(∩_∩)o...。最好主意一下下哦
思路很清晰，但是例子好像不是很充分，而且即使举出了例子，也没有充分的把他展开
思路很值得学习。。呵呵