issue17【为我所用小组】第一次作业 By usaya

usayaUID: 2374023

TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two typesof laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility toobey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjustlaws."

Outline:
1.法律的确有公正与不公正之分;对于公正的法律应该遵守,而不遵守甚至反抗不公正的法律是错误的
2.约束个人行为的法律对每个人都是公正且公平的.举例分析法律的公正性
3.在某些个人(或团体)之间的利益发生冲突时,法律的判决往往对其中一方显得并不公正.举例并分析
4.面对受到不公正的法律的判罚时,应以其他有效的方法提出其不公正性,而不是反抗法律的权威.
5.Conclusion

WORDS: 516          TIME: 01:41:26          DATE: 2008-3-18 22:48:17

The speaker alleges that laws are dividedinto two types, just and unjust, and every social member has a duty to not onlyobey the just laws but also disobey unjust ones. In my opinion, I concede thata major part of statement is undeniably convincing, while to disobey evenresist unjust laws is somehow unreliable.

Admittedly, in a certain point of view,laws can be simply separate into fairness and unfairness. On one hand, somelaws which are enacted to restrain peoples' behavior which will possibly harmother individuals, the populace and keep the stability of the society aresurely fair to every individual and govern a society and the like. Forinstance, a rule “No Smoking in Public  Place” has been fully applied everywhere to preventa potential accident such as fire disaster. Since “No Smoking” was adopted, alot of fire disasters which might happen in classy joint have been successfullyprevented and protect people who are possibly hurt in such kinds of accidents throughrestricting peoples’ bad habits of smoking in public place. So many laws, suchas traffic law and criminal law, which are similar to what mentioned above,function to control the behavior of members in society.

On the other hand, it is so unfair for someconflicts resulting from those who protect their own interests against beinginfringed that they cannot be judged justifiably. Consider, for example, a lawthat regulates the sulfur dioxide a certain factory can emit to the air so asto bring about the pollution nearby. Such laws are enacted mainly to protectthe environment and public health. But complying with the regulation will be costlyfor the factory. To compensate for the cost of compliance, the leader has tolay off employees to reduce the products, or increase the price of its productsin stead. At stake are the respective interests of the factory’s owners,employees and customers, as well as the opposing interests of the region’sresidents who are impacted with their health and safety. In short, some lawswhich fail to protect two or more sides’ interests in a conflict are otherwiserecognized as unfair at all.

It is undoubted that to obey judicial lawsis, of course, is a common sense for people. Yet, when judged by equitable laws,some behaviors such as disobey, resist even challenge the authority of laws areotherwise lack of reason and would be severely punished. Moreover, without retaining from these assumptions, by justifying a violation of one sort of law it is frightful for us to slip slope toward sanctioning all types of illegalbehavior, such as frightening criminal conduct. To better improve the justiceof laws, people who were judged unjust should offer proposals to the justicedepartment and certainly they will pay attention to these unjust laws, perhapsthey will adopt your ideas and reform this type of laws more equitable to everyindividual.

In sum, we need to reach an agreement thata just law is worthy of obeying, while improve other unjust laws by effectiveand secure measures other than disobeying it.

[ 本帖最后由 usaya 于 2008-3-23 20:35 编辑 ]

zwolfeUID: 2424872

:confused: 可能是这几天缺少休息，我得脑子一团浆糊。再加上刚摸了一下。
你的思路没有看懂，第四段讨论的什么主题啊，第二和第三还可以，
今天不行了，我老是打错字。
你自己仔细看看吧

usayaUID: 2374023

第四段的意思就是否定disobey unjust laws啊,估计是我的开头句有点问题吧.哎,我是晚上写的,现在自己看看都觉得好象有点问题来着,需要改改了

guoshishuoUID: 2467577

The speaker alleges that laws are divided into two types, just and unjust, and every social member has a duty to not only obey the just laws but also disobey unjust ones. In my opinion, I concede that a major part of (the)statement is undeniably convincing, while to disobey evenresist unjust laws is somehow unreliable.

Admittedly, in a certain point of view,laws can be simply separate into fairness and unfairness. On one     hand, some laws which are enacted to restrain peoples' behavior which will possibly harm other individuals, the populace and keep the stability of the society are surely fair to every individual and govern a society and the like这句结构有问题. For instance, a rule “No Smoking in Public  Place” has been fully applied everywhere to prevent a potential accident such as fire disaster. Since “No Smoking” was adopted, alot of fire disasters which might happen in classy joint have been successfully prevented and protect people who are possibly hurt in such kinds of accidents through restricting peoples’ bad habits of smoking in public place. So many laws, suchas traffic law and criminal law, which are similar to what mentioned above,function to control the behavior of members in society.

On the other hand, it is so unfair for some conflicts resulting from those who protect their own interests against being infringed that they cannot be judged justifiably.（这句太绕，表达明确点比较好，尤其它是主题句） Consider, for example, a lawthat regulates the amount of sulfur dioxide a certain factory can emit to the air so as to bring about the pollution nearby. Such laws are enacted mainly to protectthe environment and public health. But complying with the regulation will be costlyfor the factory. To compensate for the cost of compliance, the leader has to lay off employees to reduce the products, or increase the price of its products instead. At stake are the respective interests of the factory’s owners,employees and customers, as well as the opposing interests of the region’sresidents who are impacted with their health and safety. In short, some lawswhich fail to protect two or more sides’ interests in a conflict are otherwiserecognized as unfair at all.

It is undoubted that to obey judicial lawsislaws, of course, is a common sense for people. Yet, when judged by equitable laws,some behaviors such as disobey, resist even challenge the authority of laws areotherwise lack of reason and would be severely punished. Moreover, without retaining from these assumptions, by justifying a violation of one sort of law  is frightful for us to slip slope toward sanctioning all types of illegalbehavior, such as frightening criminal conduct. To better improve the justiceof laws, people who were judged unjust should offer proposals to the justicedepartment and certainly they will pay attention to these unjust laws, perhapsthey will adopt your ideas and reform this type of laws more equitable to everyindividual.这段有点乱

In sum, we need to reach an agreement thata just law is worthy of obeying, while improve other unjust laws by effectiveand secure measures other than disobeying it.

yt-sophiaUID: 2342654

The speaker alleges that laws are divided into two types, just and unjust, and every social member has a duty to not only obey the just laws but also disobey unjust ones. （既然引述就应该完整，题目中还有反抗）In my opinion, I concede that a major part of statement is undeniably convincing, while to disobey even resist unjust laws is somehow unreliable.（主题句不鲜明，建议说都要服从，对于不公正的应该通过正当手段）

Admittedly, in a certain point of view, laws can be simply separate into fairness and unfairness. On one hand, some laws which are enacted to restrain peoples' behavior which will possibly harm other individuals, the populace and keep the stability of the society are surely fair to every individual and govern a society and the like. For instance, a rule “No Smoking in Public  Place” has been fully applied everywhere to prevent a potential accident such as fire disaster. Since “No Smoking” was adopted, a lot of fire disasters which might happen in classy joint have been successfully prevented and protect people who are possibly hurt in such kinds of accidents through restricting peoples’ bad habits of smoking in public place. So many laws, such as traffic law and criminal law, which are similar to what mentioned above, function to control the behavior of members in society.

On the other hand, it is so unfair for some conflicts resulting from those who protect their own interests against being infringed that they cannot be judged justifiably. Consider, for example, a law that regulates the sulfur dioxide a certain factory can emit to the air so as to bring about the pollution nearby. Such laws are enacted mainly to protect the environment and public health. But complying with the regulation will be costly for the factory. To compensate for the cost of compliance, the leader has to lay off employees to reduce the products, or increase the price of its products in stead. At stake are the respective interests of the factory’s owners, employees and customers, as well as the opposing interests of the region’s residents who are impacted with their health and safety. In short, some laws which fail to protect two or more sides’ interests in a conflict are otherwise recognized as unfair at all.（感觉这段说的这种法律属于不合理而不是不公平）

It is undoubted that to obey judicial laws, of course, is a common sense for people. Yet, when judged by equitable laws, some behaviors such as disobey, resist even challenge the authority of laws are otherwise lack of reason and would be severely punished. Moreover, without retaining from these assumptions, by justifying a violation of one sort of law it is frightful for us to slip slope toward sanctioning all types of illegal behavior, such as frightening criminal conduct. To better improve the justice of laws, people who were judged unjust should offer proposals to the justice apartment （这里可以举其他手段）and certainly they will pay attention to these unjust laws, perhaps they will adopt your ideas and reform this type of laws more equitable to every individual.（缺少总结句）

In sum, we need to reach an agreement that a just law is worthy of obeying, while improve other unjust laws by effective and secure measures other than disobeying it.

有很多地方忘记加空格，望注意。拼写错误最好自己用word检查修改后再发上来让大家改。

[ 本帖最后由 yt-sophia 于 2008-3-24 13:16 编辑 ]

ellisUID: 2256846

修改

The speaker alleges that laws are divided into two types, just and unjust, and every social member has a duty to not only obey the just laws but also disobey unjust ones. In my opinion, I concede that a major part of statement is undeniably convincing, while to disobey even resist unjust laws is somehow unreliable.    (呵呵，模版吧)

Admittedly, in a certain point of view, laws can be simply separate into fairness and unfairness. On one hand, some laws which are enacted to restrain peoples' behavior which will possibly harm other individuals, the populace and keep the stability of the society are surely fair to every individual and govern a society and the like. For instance, a rule “No Smoking in Public Place” has been fully applied everywhere to prevent a potential accident such as fire disaster. Since “No Smoking” was adopted, a lot of fire disasters which might happen in classy joint have been successfully prevented and protect people who are possibly hurt in such kinds of accidents through restricting peoples’ bad habits of smoking in public place. So many laws, such as traffic law and criminal law, which are similar to what mentioned above, function to control the behavior of members in society.

On the other hand, it is so unfair for some conflicts resulting from those who protect their own interests against being infringed that they cannot be judged justifiably. Consider, for example, a law that regulates the sulfur dioxide a certain factory can emit to the air so as to bring about the pollution nearby. Such laws are enacted mainly to protect the environment and public health. But complying with the regulation will be costly for the factory. To compensate for the cost of compliance, the leader has to lay off employees to reduce the products, or increase the price of its products in stead. At stake are the respective interests of the factory’s owners, employees and customers, as well as the opposing interests of the region’s residents who are impacted with their health and safety. In short, some lawswhich(laws which) fail to protect two or more sides’ interests in a conflict are otherwiserecognized(otherwise recognized) as unfair at all.

It is undoubted that to obey judicial lawsis, of course, is a common sense for people. Yet, when judged by equitable laws, some behaviors such as disobey, resist even challenge the authority of laws areotherwise(are otherwise) lack of reason and would be severely punished. Moreover, without retaining from these assumptions, by justifying a violation of one sort of law it is frightful for us to slip slope toward sanctioning all types of illegalbehavior(illegal behavior), such as frightening criminal conduct. To better improve the justiceof（justice of） laws, people who were judged unjust should offer proposals to the justicedepartment(justice department) and certainly they will pay attention to these unjust laws, perhapsthey(perhaps they) will adopt your ideas and reform this type of laws more equitable to everyindividual(every individual).
可以在说点具体的例如你所说到的挑战权威等的行为，如何挑战，对其他人有什么后果等

In sum, we need to reach an agreement thata (that a) just law is worthy of obeying, while improve other unjust laws by effectiveand(effective and) secure measures other than disobeying it.
你对北美范文很熟啊，呵呵，我有参考了点呢

[ 本帖最后由 ellis 于 2008-3-24 16:07 编辑 ]

usayaUID: 2374023

恩恩，因为功底差，所以整个框架几乎就是完全参考了北美范文上面的，努力多写些文章后争取把模板屏弃掉．

至于出现错字我也很莫明，怎么在word里面没有出现，帖上来就有了．．．

ellisUID: 2256846

我底子也不行,呵呵,我也经常参考北美

[ 本帖最后由 ellis 于 2008-3-25 22:43 编辑 ]